• Ei tuloksia

9 Results and discussion

9.5 Microscopic evaluation

The samples’ uniformity was evaluated from the microscope taken with magnification 6.3 and 6.4

best samples were very consistent and regular (

inconsistency still not showing openings in the structure ( with more inconsistency (

The warp yarns were divided into sparser and denser sections, especially with extremely high warp densities.

37 Average contact angles and standard deviations measured with DI

DMEM for plain weaves 8, 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent, and plain weave derivatives 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent

cover factors

contact angle measurements ( wettability and permeability of th significantly between th

Only the sample of plain

measured with DMEM than DI 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent ha

the plain weave with 8 yarns/reed dent in less than when the warp density is considered

liquid penetrate easily.

measured on in diameter, which made

estimation is based on microscopica was not allowed to

the structure to pass.

significantly denser and

Microscopic evaluation

The samples’ uniformity was evaluated from the microscope taken with magnification 6.3 and 6.4 (Figure 3

best samples were very consistent and regular (

inconsistency still not showing openings in the structure ( with more inconsistency (

The warp yarns were divided into sparser and denser sections, especially with extremely high warp densities.

Average contact angles and standard deviations measured with DI

DMEM for plain weaves 8, 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent, and plain weave derivatives 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent (n = 10).

cover factors and total void percentages contact angle measurements (Figure 3

wettability and permeability of th

significantly between the results measured with DI

Only the sample of plain weave with 8 yarns/reed dent had measured with DMEM than DI

10 and 12 yarns/reed dent had contact angles around 120 ve with 8 yarns/reed dent in less than

when the warp density is considered easily. The droplets measured on all the denser samples

in diameter, which made it quite likely that there were estimation is based on microscopica

was not allowed to pass straight through them. T the structure to pass. To conclude, the

significantly denser and more slowly wetting than Microscopic evaluation

The samples’ uniformity was evaluated from the microscope taken with magnification Figure 38). The uniformity was in four different categories. Some of the best samples were very consistent and regular (

inconsistency still not showing openings in the structure ( with more inconsistency (Figure

The warp yarns were divided into sparser and denser sections, especially with extremely Average contact angles and standard deviations measured with DI

DMEM for plain weaves 8, 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent, and plain weave derivatives 10 .

and total void percentages Figure 37) were done t wettability and permeability of the structures.

e results measured with DI

weave with 8 yarns/reed dent had

measured with DMEM than DI-water. All the samples with warp yarn density o contact angles around 120

ve with 8 yarns/reed dent in less than

when the warp density is considered. The numerous through

he droplets kept their round shape during time around two all the denser samples

it quite likely that there were estimation is based on microscopical imaging

pass straight through them. T

To conclude, the samples with 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent were lowly wetting than

Microscopic evaluation

The samples’ uniformity was evaluated from the microscope taken with magnification The uniformity was in four different categories. Some of the best samples were very consistent and regular (

inconsistency still not showing openings in the structure (

Figure 38C – D) had clearly visible openings in the structure.

The warp yarns were divided into sparser and denser sections, especially with extremely Average contact angles and standard deviations measured with DI

DMEM for plain weaves 8, 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent, and plain weave derivatives 10 and total void percentages are only theoretical

) were done t e structures. The

e results measured with DI-water and DMEM culture medium.

weave with 8 yarns/reed dent had

water. All the samples with warp yarn density o contact angles around 120

ve with 8 yarns/reed dent in less than ten

. The numerous through

kept their round shape during time around two all the denser samples. The droplets were

it quite likely that there were l imaging. Due to the pass straight through them. T

samples with 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent were lowly wetting than the control sample.

The samples’ uniformity was evaluated from the microscope taken with magnification The uniformity was in four different categories. Some of the best samples were very consistent and regular (Figure 38

inconsistency still not showing openings in the structure (

) had clearly visible openings in the structure.

The warp yarns were divided into sparser and denser sections, especially with extremely Average contact angles and standard deviations measured with DI

DMEM for plain weaves 8, 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent, and plain weave derivatives 10 are only theoretical

) were done to get more accurate view of the The contact angles did not

water and DMEM culture medium.

weave with 8 yarns/reed dent had significantly higher

water. All the samples with warp yarn density o contact angles around 120°. All the droplets penetrated

seconds, which is understandable . The numerous through-go

kept their round shape during time around two The droplets were approximately

it quite likely that there were openings under Due to the small size of the openings pass straight through them. Thus the liquid must diffuse into

samples with 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent were the control sample.

The samples’ uniformity was evaluated from the microscope taken with magnification The uniformity was in four different categories. Some of the Figure 38A) and some had minor inconsistency still not showing openings in the structure (Figure 38

) had clearly visible openings in the structure.

The warp yarns were divided into sparser and denser sections, especially with extremely Average contact angles and standard deviations measured with DI

DMEM for plain weaves 8, 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent, and plain weave derivatives 10 are only theoretical values.

o get more accurate view of the contact angles did not

water and DMEM culture medium.

significantly higher

water. All the samples with warp yarn density o the droplets penetrated seconds, which is understandable going openings let the kept their round shape during time around two

approximately openings under

size of the openings hus the liquid must diffuse into samples with 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent were

the control sample.

The samples’ uniformity was evaluated from the microscope taken with magnification The uniformity was in four different categories. Some of the ) and some had minor Figure 38B). The samples ) had clearly visible openings in the structure.

The warp yarns were divided into sparser and denser sections, especially with extremely 66

Average contact angles and standard deviations measured with DI-water and DMEM for plain weaves 8, 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent, and plain weave derivatives 10 . Therefore, o get more accurate view of the

contact angles did not differ water and DMEM culture medium.

significantly higher contact water. All the samples with warp yarn density of the droplets penetrated seconds, which is understandable ing openings let the kept their round shape during time around two approximately 1.5 mm openings under it. This

size of the openings the hus the liquid must diffuse into samples with 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent were

The samples’ uniformity was evaluated from the microscope taken with magnification The uniformity was in four different categories. Some of the ) and some had minor

The samples ) had clearly visible openings in the structure.

The warp yarns were divided into sparser and denser sections, especially with extremely 66

water and DMEM for plain weaves 8, 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent, and plain weave derivatives 10 Therefore, o get more accurate view of the differ water and DMEM culture medium.

contact f the droplets penetrated seconds, which is understandable ing openings let the kept their round shape during time around two 1.5 mm it. This

the hus the liquid must diffuse into samples with 10 and 12 yarns/reed dent were

The samples’ uniformity was evaluated from the microscope taken with magnification The uniformity was in four different categories. Some of the ) and some had minor

The samples ) had clearly visible openings in the structure.

The warp yarns were divided into sparser and denser sections, especially with extremely

Figure 38

weave: A) 10 yarns/reed dent.

side, C) 6 yarns/reed de Weft )

Plain weave the interlacing points yarns. The openings were clearly with

size. In the plain weave with 6 even in the interlacing poi

10 there were some irregular openings interlacing points

direction.

With eight yarns/reed

openings between individual filaments, width 10 magnification of 10. The long

Due to the high number of yarns in same reed dent, plain weave higher weft density

warp direction. There were small openings between the fibres, mostly located in the sparser sect

yarn. With

half of the width of a filament,

Plain weave woven with the help of paraffin oil (Figure 39

had clear sparse and dense sections in warp direction, in one reed dent.

fibres (in

order of magnitude as the fibre diameter. They were located more to the s The sample

with 10 yarns/

otherwise smaller openings a few micrometres in size. With 12 yarns/reed dent there were no through

approximately 10

the samples looked very dense and uniform.

Figure 38 Magnification of 6.3 ) 10 yarns/reed dent.

6 yarns/reed de

Plain weave with 4 interlacing points

The openings were

clearly with the magnification of 10.

he plain weave with 6 even in the interlacing poi

10 there were some irregular openings

interlacing points. Most of the narrow openings in all samples were in ith eight yarns/reed

openings between individual filaments, width 10 magnification of 10. The long

Due to the high number of yarns in same reed dent, plain weave higher weft density (

warp direction. There were small openings between the fibres, mostly located in the sparser sections of the fabric. T

yarn. With the magnification of 10 the slit of the width of a filament,

Plain weave woven with the help of paraffin oil Figure 39E) and 12 yarns

had clear sparse and dense sections in warp direction, in one reed dent. With both

(in the warp direction). Their

order of magnitude as the fibre diameter. They were located more to the s The sample with 12 yarns/reed dent

with 10 yarns/reed dent there were few slit

otherwise smaller openings a few micrometres in size. With 12 yarns/reed dent there were no through-going openings

approximately 10 m

the samples looked very dense and uniform.

Magnification of 6.3

) 10 yarns/reed dent. Plain weave derivative:

6 yarns/reed dent, reverse side,

with 4 yarns/reed dent interlacing points. There was

The openings were seen magnification of 10.

he plain weave with 6 even in the interlacing points with 10 there were some irregular openings

Most of the narrow openings in all samples were in ith eight yarns/reed (Figure 39

openings between individual filaments, width 10

magnification of 10. The long narrow openings were caused by the low weft density.

Due to the high number of yarns in same reed dent, plain weave (Figure 39D

warp direction. There were small openings between the fibres, mostly located in the ions of the fabric. The openings were clearly more located in t

magnification of 10 the slit of the width of a filament, approximately 10

Plain weave woven with the help of paraffin oil and 12 yarns/reed dent

had clear sparse and dense sections in warp direction,

With both warp densities there were minor slit direction). Their

order of magnitude as the fibre diameter. They were located more to the s with 12 yarns/reed dent

reed dent there were few slit

otherwise smaller openings a few micrometres in size. With 12 yarns/reed dent there going openings

m, but there was always another fibre to be seen underneath. Both of the samples looked very dense and uniform.

Magnification of 6.3 tells of the consistency of the fabric surface Plain weave derivative:

nt, reverse side, D)

reed dent (Figure 3 There was free space to be seen

seen already with

magnification of 10. The openings were approximately 0.3 he plain weave with 6 yarns/reed dent

nts with the magnification of 6.

10 there were some irregular openings between the filaments but still no opening Most of the narrow openings in all samples were in

Figure 39C) with the lower weft density openings between individual filaments, width 10

narrow openings were caused by the low weft density.

Due to the high number of yarns in same reed dent, plain weave

D) had clear sections of denser and sparser fabric in warp direction. There were small openings between the fibres, mostly located in the

he openings were clearly more located in t magnification of 10 the slit

approximately 10

Plain weave woven with the help of paraffin oil /reed dent (Figure 3

had clear sparse and dense sections in warp direction,

warp densities there were minor slit direction). Their width was

order of magnitude as the fibre diameter. They were located more to the s with 12 yarns/reed dent had less openings

reed dent there were few slit

otherwise smaller openings a few micrometres in size. With 12 yarns/reed dent there going openings to be seen. The distances between the filaments w

, but there was always another fibre to be seen underneath. Both of the samples looked very dense and uniform.

tells of the consistency of the fabric surface Plain weave derivative:

) 10 yarns/reed dent, reverse side.

Figure 39A) free space to be seen

already with the magnification of 6.

The openings were approximately 0.3 reed dent (Figure 39

magnification of 6.

between the filaments but still no opening Most of the narrow openings in all samples were in

with the lower weft density openings between individual filaments, width

10-narrow openings were caused by the low weft density.

Due to the high number of yarns in same reed dent, plain weave

lear sections of denser and sparser fabric in warp direction. There were small openings between the fibres, mostly located in the

he openings were clearly more located in t

magnification of 10 the slit-like openings between filaments were only approximately 10 m.

Plain weave woven with the help of paraffin oil

Figure 39F). With magnification of 6.3 they both had clear sparse and dense sections in warp direction,

warp densities there were minor slit width was approximately 15

order of magnitude as the fibre diameter. They were located more to the s had less openings

reed dent there were few slit-like openings, size 20 m x 0.1 mm, and otherwise smaller openings a few micrometres in size. With 12 yarns/reed dent there

seen. The distances between the filaments w , but there was always another fibre to be seen underneath. Both of the samples looked very dense and uniform.

tells of the consistency of the fabric surface

Plain weave derivative: B) 12 yarns/reed dent, reverse 10 yarns/reed dent, reverse side.

) had visible openings regularly in free space to be seen between the filaments of

magnification of 6.

The openings were approximately 0.3 Figure 39B) no openings were magnification of 6.4. With

between the filaments but still no opening Most of the narrow openings in all samples were in

with the lower weft density

-15 m, to be seen

narrow openings were caused by the low weft density.

Due to the high number of yarns in same reed dent, plain weave (8 yarns/reed de lear sections of denser and sparser fabric in warp direction. There were small openings between the fibres, mostly located in the

he openings were clearly more located in t

like openings between filaments were only Plain weave woven with the help of paraffin oil had two warp densities, 10

. With magnification of 6.3 they both had clear sparse and dense sections in warp direction, due to the great number of yarns

warp densities there were minor slit-approximately 15

order of magnitude as the fibre diameter. They were located more to the s

had less openings. With the magnification of 10 like openings, size 20 m x 0.1 mm, and otherwise smaller openings a few micrometres in size. With 12 yarns/reed dent there

seen. The distances between the filaments w , but there was always another fibre to be seen underneath. Both of

tells of the consistency of the fabric surface

12 yarns/reed dent, reverse 10 yarns/reed dent, reverse side.

had visible openings regularly in between the filaments of magnification of 6.4 and even more The openings were approximately 0.3 –

) no openings were 4. With the magnification of between the filaments but still no opening Most of the narrow openings in all samples were in

with the lower weft density there were smaller to be seen

narrow openings were caused by the low weft density.

8 yarns/reed de lear sections of denser and sparser fabric in warp direction. There were small openings between the fibres, mostly located in the

he openings were clearly more located in the sides of the like openings between filaments were only had two warp densities, 10 . With magnification of 6.3 they both

the great number of yarns -like openings between approximately 15 – 20 m, in the same order of magnitude as the fibre diameter. They were located more to the sparser areas

. With the magnification of 10 like openings, size 20 m x 0.1 mm, and otherwise smaller openings a few micrometres in size. With 12 yarns/reed dent there

seen. The distances between the filaments w , but there was always another fibre to be seen underneath. Both of

67

tells of the consistency of the fabric surface. Plain 12 yarns/reed dent, reverse 10 yarns/reed dent, reverse side. (Warp

had visible openings regularly in between the filaments of same 4 and even more – 0.4 mm in ) no openings were seen magnification of between the filaments but still no openings in Most of the narrow openings in all samples were in the warp there were smaller to be seen with the narrow openings were caused by the low weft density.

8 yarns/reed dent) with lear sections of denser and sparser fabric in the warp direction. There were small openings between the fibres, mostly located in the

he sides of the like openings between filaments were only had two warp densities, 10 . With magnification of 6.3 they both

the great number of yarns like openings between 20 m, in the same parser areas.

. With the magnification of 10 like openings, size 20 m x 0.1 mm, and otherwise smaller openings a few micrometres in size. With 12 yarns/reed dent there seen. The distances between the filaments were , but there was always another fibre to be seen underneath. Both of 67

Plain 12 yarns/reed dent, reverse

had visible openings regularly in same narrow openings were caused by the low weft density.

with the warp direction. There were small openings between the fibres, mostly located in the he sides of the like openings between filaments were only had two warp densities, 10 . With magnification of 6.3 they both the great number of yarns like openings between 20 m, in the same . . With the magnification of 10 like openings, size 20 m x 0.1 mm, and otherwise smaller openings a few micrometres in size. With 12 yarns/reed dent there ere , but there was always another fibre to be seen underneath. Both of