CHAPTER 11 - Aluminium
11.2 Long-term temporal variation (Al.)
AC 0 0
DC DC 00
TF TF 00
SF 00 SF
SW SW 00
GW 01 06 88 12 8905
GW • RWR 01 11 8811 8909
RWR ;z
NC 00
NC LF 00
LF SC 00
SC -r r
0 20 40 60 80 100
1 1 .2 Long-term temporal variation (Al
,oi)In this section, time series of monthly fluxes of aluminium expressed as regv/(m2 °month) are shown for the IM area Hietajärvi (FI03).
1 1 .3 Mass balances
Aluminium leaches from everyarea where measured.
The highest losses are calculated for areas with the most acidic deposition in southernmost Scandinavia.
Al 1988-89, scale unit l0 rng/m2 ®a
Al 1989-90, scale unit 10 mg/m2oa
CHAPTER 12 Tree stands
12.1 State and effect variables
Nemoral Region
spatial frequencySo far only records from Poland is available. The
dominating free in Gardliczno (PL02) is Scot's pine year and in Lekuk (PL01) oak. The pines of Gardliczno
show both high defoliation and discoloration. subprogr.
i medium
COVERAGE DISCOLOR DEFOLIATION VITALITY TREE HEIGHT M STEM DIAM CM
2 90 AR PINU SYL 2 90 AR PINU SYL
0 20 40 60 80 100
COVERAGE DISCOLOR DEFOLIATION VITALITY TREE HEIGHT M STEM DIAM CM
1 88 AR QUER ROB 1 88 AR QUER ROB
0 20 40 60 80 100
Montaneous Central Boreonemoral Ecotone
Only data from Forellenbach (DE01)
is
available Norwegian spruce dominates in the monitoring where the dominating tree species is beech, however areas of Birkenes (NOO 1 ), Berg (SE02) and Tiveden with a very varying coverage in different parts of the (SE01 ). Defoliation is highest at Berg and lowest at drainage. The defoliation ranges between 20-40% Birkenes. In Berg some 30% of the stand is dead. The and the discoloration between 10-20%. On the lichen index, PSI (cf. Bråkenhielm in ASR 1, 1990) is average 10% of the trees are dead. In Jezeri (CS03) also low at Berg.considerable forest-die back occurs, although no data is available.
COVERAGE DISCOLOR DEFOLIATION VITALITY TREE HEIGHT M STEM DIAM CM PSI
0 20 40 60 80 100
590 FAGU SYL 990 FAGU SYL 990 FAGU SYL 590 FAGU SYL 590 FAGU SYL 590 FAGU SYL
COVERAGE DISCOLOR DEFOLIATION VITALITY TREE HEIGHT M STEM DIAM CM PSI
1 86 AR Pi ABAB 1 90 AR PI ABAB 1 90 AR PI ABAB
1 86 AR PI AB.AB 1 86 AR PI ABAB
0 20 40 60 80 100
K
--rr
COVERAGE %
5
E02DISCOLOR %
1 90 AR PILE AB!
DEFOLIATION % " '
1 90 AR PILE ABI VITALITY %
TREE HEIGHT M ~u STEM DIAM CM
PSI
1 87 TR PICE AB!
1 87 TR PICE AB!
1 87 TR PICE AB!
1 88 EP PINU SYL 0 20 40 60 80 100
1 90 AR PICE AR!
1 90 AR PICE ABI 1 89 TR PICE AR!
1 89 TR PICE AB!
1 89 TR PICE AB!
1 87 EP PINU SYL
Boreal Region
Dominating species are either Norwegian spruce trees are higher. PSI-values are high in the north, in (FI01, SE03) or Scot's pine (NO02, F103, F104, particular along the Finnish/Carelian border but except in F105 -where Betula pubescens tortuosa has drop towards the Arctic (FI05, SU 16).
a wider areal coverage). Defoliation is highest in Pesosjärvi (50%), but the stand is still vital and the PSI
Forest Steppe - Submediterranean Ecotone is very high, > 250. The highest discoloration is
found in Reivo (SE03) where the portion of dead
No data exist.
20 40 60 80 100 COVERAGE %
DISCOLOR % DEFOLIATION % VITALITY % TREE HEIGHT M STEM DIAM CM PSI
0
1 88AR P!CEAB!
1 89 AR PICE AB!
2 90 TR P!CE AB!
2 90 TR PICE ABI 2 90 TR PICE AB!
I 8<4 EP PINU SYL COVERAGE %
DISCOLOR %
. 5 90 AR PICE AB!
DEFOLIATION %
iU1
5 90 AR PICE AB!.. '2.:.
uI!
VITALflY 0/ ¼ \$
i i l
7 87 TR PICE AB!TREE HEIGHT M 7 87 TR PICE AB!
STEM DIAM CM
ILIL_
I 7 87 TR PICE AB!PS! 2 88 EP P!NU SYL
0 20 40 60 80 100
COVERAGE % DISCOLOR % DEFOLIATION % VITALITY % TREE HEIGHT M STEM DIAM CM PSI
` -k
•/ -
0 20 40 60 80 100
1 8,9 AR PINU SYL 1 90 AR PINU SYL I 90 AR PINUSYL
1 89AR PINUSYL
COVERAGE % FO3
-
T
i iDISCOLOR %
. . . 6 90 AR PINU SYL
DEFOLIATION %
1....:.: J
• . . 6 90 AR PINU SYLVITAL/fl' % '! 6 88 TR PINU SYL
TREE HEIGHT M 6 88 TR PINU SYL
STEM DIAM CM
I
6 88 TR PINU SYLPSI 90 EP PINU SYL
0 20 40 60 80 100
F104
I
S\'\
I1
0 100 200 300
5 90 AR PICE AR/
5 90 AR PICEARI 5 89TR PICE ABI 5 89 TR PICE ABI 5 89TR PICE AB/
4 89 EP PINU SYL COVERAGE %
DISCOLOR % DEFOLIATION %
VITALITY TREE HE!GHTM STEM DIAM CM PSI
COVERAGE DISCOLOR DEFOLIATION %
VITALITY TREE HEIGHT M STEM DIAM CM PSI
01
0 20 40 60 80 100
2 90 AR PINUSYL 2 90 AR PINUSYL 3 88 TR PINU SYL 3 88 TR PINU SYL 3 88 TR PINU SYL 2 89 EP PINU SYL
20 40 60 80 100 COVERAGE
DISCOLOR DEFOLIATION VITALITY TREE HEIGHT M STEM DIAM CM PSI
0
1 90 TR PINU PAL 1 90 TR PINU PAL 1 90 TR PINU PAL
COVERAGE DISCOLOR % DEFOLIATION % VITALITY % TREE HEIGHT M STEM DIA/vl CM
1 90 TR ABIE NOR 1 90 TR ABIE NOR 1 90 TR ABIE NOR COVERAGE %
DISCOLOR DEFOLIATION VITALITY % TREE HEIGHT M STEM DIAM CM PSI
S
8o
2 89 EP PINU SYL 0 20 40 60 80 100
Nemoral and Montaneous East
Few data exist. In Karadag (SU17) on the Crimean nordmanniana has a relatively low vitality and a low peninsula the vitality ofPinuspalustrisisverylowand PSI-value (35).
in the Juga Massif of Caucasus (SU05) Abios
12.2 Long-term variation
Two time-series of changes in defoliation are presented. The available data are too scarce for making any conclusions.
defoliation
No01 Picea abies
25
20 ...
15 W
...
10
5 r~—imi— r— —r—,—s-
85 86 87 88 89 90 91
defoliation
SE01 Picea able:
25 20 15
10 5
86 87 88 89 90 91
CHAPTER 13
where mosses have the largest coverage but also a high patchiness. The lichen coverage is insignificant.Herbaceous plants dominate over shrubs and dwarf-shrubs. The herbs also have a high fertility. Shrub
U nderstorey vegetal ion
species are few but frequent.13.1 Stale and effect variables
Boreonemoral EcotoneData is still sparse, mainly from Norden. Data exist only for Berg (SE02) and Tiveden (SEO1).
In both areas mosses predominate the coverage.
Nemoral Region Lichens are few and insignificant in coverage. The
No data exist. spatial frequensy
Montaneous Central year
Data has been collected only for Forellenbach (DE01) , medium
COVE OF B4'S COVE OF M2'S %
COVE OF L2'S COVE OF GRAM SPEC%
COVE OF SHRUBS FERTILITY FREQ OF GRAM SPEC%
FREQ OF SHRUBS FREQ OF L2'S
2 90 2 90
2 90 2 90
2 90 DICR SCP 2 90 DESC FLE 2 90 VACC MYR
0 20 40 60 80
COVE OF B4'S COVE OF M2'S COVE OF L2'S COVE OF GRAM SPEC%
COVE OF SHRUBS FERTILITY FREQ OF GRAM SPEC%
FREQ OF SHRUBS FREQ OF L2'S
graminaceous coverage are quite similar for both areas. Shrubs and dwarf-shrubs dominate the plant coverage in Tiveden and the dominating species is also very frequent. In Berg the frequency of the dominating grass exceeds the frequency of the dominating dwarf-shrub.
Boreal Region
Data is available for the Finnish areas and for Reivo (SE03). Except for Valkeakotinen (FI01) mosses have a larger coverage than higher plants. The lichen coverage is insignificant except for Vuoskojärvi
(F105). Most plants are shrubs or dwarf-shrubs and the dominating species also have a high frequency (not in Pesosjärvi, F104). The grass-coverage is usually low, in some areas mainly comprising 1-2 species which however are frequent. The highest fertility values are recorded in Hietajärvi (F103), otherwise they are very low.
Montaneous East
Herbaceous species dominates over grass; the grass-species are however frequent.
COVE OF M'S %
3 90 3 90
3 90 3 90
2 90 VACC M YR 3 90CALAARU 3 90 VACC MYR
V10 y
60 80 100
20 40
COVE OF 84'S
% N O
COVE OF M2'S % COVE OF L2'S % COVE OF GRAM SPEC%
COVE OF SHRUBS % FERTILITY % FREQ OF GRAM SPEC%
FREQ OF SHRUBS %
FREQ OF L2'S % J , 1 89
0 20 40 60 80 100
COVE OF B4'S % COVE OF M2'S % COVE OF L2'S % COVE OF GRAM SPEC%
COVE OF SHRUBS % FERTILITY % FREQ OF GRAM SPEC%
FREQ OF SHRUBS % FREQ OF L2'S %
0
COVE OF B4'S % COVE OF M2'S % COVE OF L2'S % COVE OF GRAM SPEC%
II
COVE OF SHRUBS % FERTILITY % FREQ OF GRAM SPEC%
FREQ OF SHRUBS % FREQ OF L2'S % j
0
3 90 3 90 3 90 3 90 3 90
2 90 PLEU SCH 3 90 ERIO VAG 3 90 VACC MYR 3 90
20 40 60 80 100
20 40 60 80 100
COVE OF B4'S % COVE OF M2'S % COVE OF L2'S % COVE OF GRAM SPEC%
COVE OF SHRUBS % FERTILITY % FREQ OF GRAM SPEC%
FREQ OF SHRUBS % FREQ OF L2'S %
5(105
1 901 90 MILT SCH
0 20 40 60 80 100
13.2 Long-term variation
Some time-series are shown for three Swedish areas.
Both declining trends as sudden changes can be seen. As to what extent these are objective/subjective must be determined by later detailed evaluation.
Coverage % of vascular plants SEO 1 100
80 ...
60 ... ...
40 ...ID... 9... o... ... ...
20 ...
0
80 82 84 86 88 90
Coverage % of vascular plants
SE02 100
80 60 40 20
5E02
0+-
80 82
84 86 8890 92
Coverage % of vascular plants
SE03 100 ...
80 ...
60
...40 &' 20
0
82 84 86 88
90 92
Coverage
% of shrubsSE01 100
80 60 40 20
0 - - - 'imi.. - -
r- - - T r80 82
811 86 88 90Coverage % of shrubs
SE03
100
...
80
...
60
...
40
- - 3.
20 0-
82 84 86 88 90 92
Coverage % of grarrunaceous species 100
80 60-
40•
20
0 —
80 82 84
SEO I
86 88 90
Coverage % of graminaceous species 100•
80 ...I...
60 ...
40 ...
20 ...
0 1~--~~—f--r
80 82 84 86
SE02
88 90 92
Coverage % of grain inaceous species
100- - -
80= ...
60-_..
40
20
I- 1.. -[ -
82 84 86
SE03
88 90 92
Coverage % of mosses
SE01
100-- -- - - - -
w _ ..._..._...._.._...._ ... ... ...
80
60
40a ...
20 ...
80 82 84 86 88 90
Coverage % of mosses
SE02 100
80 ... ...
60 ... ... ...
40 ... ...
o
... r~... ...~...
20 . ...
0 i .. -r - -.. -T_ i-
-r -~.- _1 = ' -
80 82 84 86 88 90 92
Coverage % of mosses 100
80= ;)
60• 40
20
0 V— — T
82 84 86 Coverage % of epigaeic lichens
100 80 60
40
20
0
80 82 84 Coverage % of epigaeic lichens
100 80
60
40
20
0
80 82 84 Coverage % of epigaeic lichens
100 80 60
40
SE03
88 90 92 SEO 1
86 88 90
5E02
86 88 90 SE03
ANNEX
Programme activity report
t~ cSU
r= ,
ICOI 1 ara
SUO,
Siting of areas
IM - National Focal Centres
Austria,
Federal Environmental AgencyCanada, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Ontario
Czech (i#0 Slovak Federal cepr3hl c,
Geological Survey,Praha Deamw'Ic,
EnvironmentalResearch
Institute, CopenhagenFinland,
EnvironmentDala
Centre, HelsinkiGenii w y',Umweltsbundesamt, Pilotstation ,Frankfurt
Hungaay,
Water Resource Research Institute, BudapestIceland
Agricultural Research Institute, ReykjavikNetherlands,
Institute for Public Health and Env. Protection, BilihovenNorway,
AirResearch
Institute, LilleströmPoland,
Environmental Protection Institute, Warszawa Portugn i, Dir. Geral da Qualidade do Ambiente, LisboaSoviet Union, Institute of Global Climate and Ecology, Moscow
Swede.,
Environmental Protection Agency, UppsalaSwflxcrIraar
Federal Institute for Forest,Snow
and Landscape Research United Ki,igdn, Institute of Hydrology, OxonOijifed S k+te:.5, Environment Protection Agency, N Carolina
Jl !t~
cT I
qaY ~ CA
-
O
Monitoring and data reporting
6oP-o/oil z'l ns dl snsoano3 von5 ou!zalag ZOAS Allon 91A5 U09p190 d035 on!ad r03s GlaB 7035 uapan!1 I OJS ola uaIV I Old ouzJ!1P1D`J LOld
;In;lal 101d ulon/9Y JOON cu/!j I OON uI0nopa/H 10.71
!s0l'J0, IOnH auuou8 UAll E08`J ualJDH uoJy 61089 4P1DJ1D4W 0 Il/V I0/9 yvq!o;Is0nn cold wolsosad P0U
!APIDIGIH coli uau!loaoaalofl I Old /n~loy L0M ypaluG//aoj 1030 U!/OG/5 1000 onownS-z!1 P053
!/azof C053 nn/ouA&y 61053 a:lsuauy 1053 lagoIualg I 0H3 /!013 a,l°i ZOV3