• Ei tuloksia

Comparison of elastic, viscoelastic and failure tensile material properties of knee ligaments and patellar tendon

N/A
N/A
Info
Lataa
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Jaa "Comparison of elastic, viscoelastic and failure tensile material properties of knee ligaments and patellar tendon"

Copied!
35
0
0

Kokoteksti

(1)

UEF//eRepository

DSpace https://erepo.uef.fi

Rinnakkaistallenteet Luonnontieteiden ja metsätieteiden tiedekunta

2018

Comparison of elastic, viscoelastic and failure tensile material properties of

knee ligaments and patellar tendon

Ristaniemi, Aapo

Elsevier BV

Tieteelliset aikakauslehtiartikkelit

© Elsevier Ltd

CC BY-NC-ND https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.031

https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/7108

Downloaded from University of Eastern Finland's eRepository

(2)

1 Comparison of elastic, viscoelastic and failure tensile material properties of knee ligaments 1

and patellar tendon 2

A. Ristaniemi*, L. Stenroth, S. Mikkonen, R.K. Korhonen 3

Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, FI-70211, Finland 4

5

Original article 6

7

* Address for correspondence:

8

Aapo Ristaniemi 9

Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland 10

Yliopistonranta 1F, POB 1627 11

Kuopio, Finland, FI-70211 12

Tel. +358400815152 13

E-mail: aapo.ristaniemi@uef.fi 14

15

Keywords: material properties, viscoelastic, ligament, patellar tendon, knee joint 16

Word count: 3985 17

18

(3)

2 Abstract

19

The knee ligaments and patellar tendon function in concert with each other and other joint tissues, 20

and are adapted to their specific physiological function via geometry and material properties.

21

However, it is not well known how the viscoelastic and quasi-static material properties compare 22

between the ligaments. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare these material 23

properties between the knee ligaments and patellar tendon.

24

Dumbbell-shaped tensile test samples were cut from bovine knee ligaments (ACL, LCL, MCL, 25

PCL) and patellar tendon (PT) and subjected to tensile testing (n=10 per ligament type). A 26

sinusoidal loading test was performed at 8 % strain with 0.5 % strain amplitude using 0.1, 0.5 and 27

1 Hz frequencies. Subsequently, an ultimate tensile test was performed to investigate the stress- 28

strain characteristics.

29

At 0.1 Hz, the phase difference between stress and strain was higher in LCL compared with ACL, 30

PCL and PT (p<0.05), and at 0.5 Hz higher in LCL compared with all other ligaments and PT 31

(p<0.05). PT had the longest toe-region strain (p<0.05 compared with PCL and MCL) and MCL 32

had the highest linear and strain-dependent modulus, and toughness (p<0.05 compared with ACL, 33

LCL and PT).

34

The results indicate that LCL is more viscous than other ligaments at low-frequency loads. MCL 35

was the stiffest and toughest, and its modulus increased most steeply at the toe-region, possibly 36

implying a greater amount of collagen. This study improves the knowledge about elastic, 37

viscoelastic and failure properties of the knee ligaments and PT.

38 39

(4)

3 Introduction

40

Ligaments are soft tissues in the musculoskeletal system that connect bone to bone. Their main 41

functions are to transmit forces, restrict and guide joint movement, stabilize joints and act as 42

mechanical dampers (Birch, 2013; Reynolds et al., 2017). In the knee joint, they function in concert 43

with each other and other joint tissues, such as articular cartilage and meniscus (Butler et al., 1980;

44

Ellis and Weiss, 2015). They are composed mainly of water (65 to 70 % of total weight), type I 45

collagen (70 to 80 % of dry weight), elastin (few percent), and proteoglycans (few percent) (Woo 46

et al., 2005, 1999). Similar to tendons, ligaments exhibit a hierarchical structure with highly 47

oriented fascicles, formed from fibers, and lower levels of hierarchy at fibril and collagen molecule 48

scale (Ellis and Weiss, 2015).

49 50

Adequate mechanical properties of ligaments are essential for the physiological function of the 51

knee joint. Ligaments function primarily in tension in the direction of the collagen fibers and thus 52

tensile properties in that direction are of special interest. Shear, transverse and compressive loads 53

also exist in ligaments (Ellis and Weiss, 2015; Gardiner et al., 2001), but they are less significant 54

during normal joint function. Different ligaments are adapted to their specific function via their 55

geometry and material properties (Birch, 2013). However, time-dependent and failure properties 56

of ligaments at the mesoscopic level are not well known. These properties, such as the Young’s 57

modulus and ultimate strength, represent the intrinsic material properties, as opposed to the 58

structural properties of the entire ligaments, and are essential in understanding the structure- 59

function relationships.

60 61

(5)

4 During normal locomotion, ligaments and tendons experience dynamic loads. The resulting 62

response of these tissues is time-dependent and affected by their viscoelastic properties. However, 63

studies comparing time-dependent properties of different ligaments have been concentrating on 64

varying strain rates in ultimate tensile testing (Pioletti et al., 1999; van Dommelen et al., 2005), 65

although a sinusoidal test mimics better normal knee function and repeated ligament loading.

66

Sinusoidal test results have been previously reported for human medial collateral ligament 67

(Bonifasi-Lista et al., 2005; Lujan et al., 2009), and, to our knowledge, there are no studies which 68

compare the sinusoidal test results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament 69

(PCL), medial collateral ligament (MCL), lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and patellar tendon 70

(PT) from the same set of skeletally mature knees.

71 72

Only a few studies have compared stress-strain characteristics of knee ligaments within the same 73

set of knees. Eleswarapu et al. (2011) compared the Young’s modulus and ultimate strength of 74

immature (one-week-old) bovine ligaments and found that PT had the highest modulus and 75

strength (27.5 ± 2.8 and 15.7 ± 3.3 MPa), while ACL had the lowest values (2.1 ± 1.0 and 1.4 ± 76

0.6 MPa), but the low absolute values clearly show the immaturity of the tissues. Butler et. al.

77

(1986) compared bone-fascicle-bone units of ACL, PCL, LCL and PT (MCL not compared) of 78

three cadavers, and discovered that ACL, PCL and LCL had no significant differences in the 79

Young’s modulus, strength or toughness, while PT had significantly higher values in all those 80

parameters. They observed similar failure strains for ligaments and PT; uniform failure strains 81

have also been suggested for different tendons (LaCroix et al., 2013). Smeets et al. (2017) 82

compared MCL and LCL and observed significantly higher Young’s modulus for MCL, and 83

significantly higher failure strain and toughness for LCL. To our knowledge, there are no studies 84

(6)

5 to compare the linear, non-linear and failure material properties of ACL, PCL, MCL, LCL and PT 85

from the same set of skeletally mature knees.

86 87

The purpose of the study was to comprehensively characterize and compare the viscoelastic and 88

quasi-static tensile material properties of knee joint ligaments and patellar tendon at the 89

mesoscopic level. Tensile properties were determined experimentally using a sinusoidal loading 90

test and ultimate test until tissue failure using dumbbell-shaped samples of bovine ligaments. In 91

the absence of previous comparative studies of ligament viscoelasticity, but significantly lower 92

water content observed in PT compared to knee ligaments (Rumian et al., 2007), we hypothesized 93

that viscous properties are similar between the ligaments, but lower in PT. Regarding stress-strain 94

characteristics, we hypothesized that collateral ligaments and patellar tendon exhibit higher linear 95

and strain-dependent Young’s modulus than cruciate ligaments (Butler et al., 1986; Eleswarapu et 96

al., 2011; Smeets et al., 2017), while toe, yield and failure strains are similar between ligaments 97

(Butler et al., 1986; LaCroix et al., 2013). The results of this study aid in understanding the 98

differences in the elastic and viscoelastic material properties of knee joint ligaments and PT, and 99

their structure-function relationships.

100 101

Methods 102

Sample preparation 103

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medial collateral ligament 104

(MCL), lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and patellar tendon (PT) were carefully dissected from 105

10 skeletally mature bovine stifle joints. The measurements were conducted using dumbbell- 106

shaped samples, approximately 10 mm in length and 1.8 and 2 mm in thickness and width (Figure 107

(7)

6 1a and 1b) (Bonifasi-Lista et al., 2005; Chokhandre et al., 2015; Eleswarapu et al., 2011;

108

Henninger et al., 2013; Quapp and Weiss, 1998; Stabile et al., 2004). Detailed information on 109

sample preparation can be found in the supplementary material.

110 111

Mechanical testing 112

Mechanical testing was carried out using a uniaxial material testing system. Detailed information 113

on the device and the used preconditioning can be found in the supplementary material. The 114

samples were immersed in a phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) during the measurement.

115

After a four-step stress-relaxation test (results not reported here), with the tissue relaxed at 8 % 116

nominal strain for 30 minutes, a sinusoidal test was performed with 0.5 % nominal strain amplitude 117

at 0.1 Hz, 0.5 Hz and 1 Hz frequencies for 20 cycles at each frequency. The strain level and 118

amplitude were chosen based on pilot measurements and physiological levels. Those 119

measurements showed 8 % to be in the linear region, which would make the test condition as 120

similar as possible to all ligaments, and it can occur for example during walking (Bates et al., 2015;

121

Gardiner et al., 2001; Roldán et al., 2017; Taylor et al., 2013). The strain amplitude of 0.5 % was 122

chosen to retain consistency between ligaments, and to keep the test in the linear region. Strains in 123

ACL during walking can vary much more (Roldán et al., 2017; Taylor et al., 2013), but in similar 124

experiments a smaller amplitude of 0.125 % was used (Bonifasi-Lista et al., 2005; Lujan et al., 125

2009). 20 cycles was used to ensure a stable response. The specimen was allowed to recover at 0 126

% strain for 60 minutes before starting the ultimate tensile test until tissue failure with a velocity 127

of 0.005 mm/s. A slow speed was chosen to obtain the quasi-static response of the tissue, with no 128

or only minor effect of strain rate stiffening (van Dommelen et al., 2005).

129 130

(8)

7 Data analysis

131

All analyses, except statistical analyses, were conducted using a custom MATLAB code 132

(MATLAB R2016b, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). During data analysis, the axial 133

strain was defined as logarithmic, 𝜀𝜀= ln𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿

0, where 𝐿𝐿 is the current length of the sample and 𝐿𝐿0 the 134

initial length of the sample. Logarithmic strain was chosen as the strain measure, since strains were 135

relatively high and comparison with other experimental studies is easily possible. Assuming 136

constant volume (incompressible material), the stress was defined as true stress, 𝜎𝜎= 𝐴𝐴𝐹𝐹

0 𝐿𝐿

𝐿𝐿0, where 137

𝐹𝐹 is the measured tensile force and 𝐴𝐴0 the initial cross-sectional area.

138 139

Sinusoidal data was analyzed by fitting a sinusoidal function to the stress and strain data (Bonifasi- 140

Lista et al., 2005) (Figure 1c) 141

𝑧𝑧=𝐴𝐴 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠(2𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋𝜋+𝜑𝜑) +𝑧𝑧0 (1)

142

where 𝑧𝑧 is the value of the stress or strain, 𝐴𝐴 is the amplitude, 𝜋𝜋 is the frequency, 𝜋𝜋 is the time, 𝜑𝜑 143

is the phase angle and 𝑧𝑧0 is the constant term. From these, the dynamic modulus, 𝐸𝐸𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 = 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝜎𝜎

𝜀𝜀, and 144

phase difference between stress and strain, 𝛾𝛾 = 𝜑𝜑𝜎𝜎 − 𝜑𝜑𝜀𝜀, were determined.

145 146

Figure 1d presents the determination of the material properties from the ultimate tensile testing.

147

The test was considered to be initiated when the stress reached 0.2 MPa and the results were 148

analyzed from that stress onwards, in order not to include slack in the data analysis. The Young’s 149

modulus was determined by the maximum tangent modulus (Screen et al., 2004) that was present 150

in the stress-strain curve. It was obtained by linear fittings to the stress-strain data with a strain 151

range of 8 % and going through all the points in the curve. Toe region end point (𝜀𝜀𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡,𝜎𝜎𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡) and 152

(9)

8 yield point (𝜀𝜀𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡𝑦𝑦𝑑𝑑,𝜎𝜎𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡𝑦𝑦𝑑𝑑) were defined when the strain difference between the stress-strain curve 153

and linear fit was 0.6 % (Danso et al., 2014). Ultimate strength (𝜀𝜀𝑢𝑢𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡,𝜎𝜎𝑢𝑢𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡) was the maximum stress 154

reached during the experiment. Linear region length was determined as 𝜀𝜀𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 =𝜀𝜀𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡𝑦𝑦𝑑𝑑− 𝜀𝜀𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡. 155

Toughness, 𝐾𝐾 (energy density), was calculated up to the yield and ultimate strain (Figure 1d) as 156

the integral over the stress-strain curve:

157

𝐾𝐾𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡𝑦𝑦𝑑𝑑/𝑢𝑢𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡 = ∫𝜀𝜀𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦/𝑢𝑢𝑦𝑦𝑢𝑢𝜎𝜎 𝑑𝑑𝜀𝜀

0 . (2)

158

In order to characterize ligament nonlinearities more comprehensively, the toe region of the stress- 159

strain curve, 0 <𝜀𝜀 <𝜀𝜀𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡, was characterized by fitting a second order formula (Danso et al., 2014) 160

to the data 161

𝜎𝜎=𝐴𝐴𝜀𝜀2+𝐵𝐵𝜀𝜀+𝐶𝐶, (3)

162

where A, B and C are constants. When taking a derivative over strain, Eq. 3 becomes 163

𝑑𝑑𝜎𝜎

𝑑𝑑𝜀𝜀 = 2𝐴𝐴𝜀𝜀+𝐵𝐵= 𝐸𝐸𝜀𝜀𝜀𝜀+𝐸𝐸0, (4) 164

where 𝐸𝐸𝜀𝜀 and 𝐸𝐸0 are the strain-dependent and initial modulus. Alternatively, the toe region was 165

characterized with a traditional exponential formula (Fung, 1967) 166

𝜎𝜎=𝐷𝐷(𝑒𝑒𝐹𝐹𝜀𝜀−1), (5)

167

where D and F are constants.

168 169

Statistical analyses 170

All statistical analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0.0.2 (SPSS Inc., IBM 171

Company, Armonk, NY, USA). In the tables and figures, the data is presented as mean ± standard 172

deviation, since nearly all data was normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test), and the few 173

parameters that were not, showed only a minor deviation from normal distribution. Statistical 174

comparisons in the mechanical parameters between ligament types were made using a linear mixed 175

(10)

9 model (McCulloch et al., 2008), which takes into account that the ligament samples come from 176

the same set of knees. Each mechanical parameter was analyzed with the ligament type (ACL, 177

LCL, MCL, PCL, and PT) as a fixed variable and the knee as a random subject variable with knee- 178

specific random intercepts.

179 180

Results 181

The results of the sinusoidal testing are presented in Figure 2 (phase difference 𝛾𝛾) and Table 1 182

(dynamic modulus 𝐸𝐸𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑). At 0.1 Hz loading frequency, the phase difference was significantly 183

higher in LCL compared with ACL, PCL and PT (p<0.01). A significant difference was also found 184

between MCL and PCL (p<0.05). At 0.5 Hz, the phase difference was significantly higher in LCL 185

compared with all other ligaments and PT (p<0.01 when compared with PCL and PT, p<0.05 when 186

compared with ACL and MCL), while other ligaments did not differ significantly from each other.

187

At 1 Hz, no significant differences were found in the phase difference between the ligaments. The 188

dynamic modulus was significantly higher in MCL compared with ACL, LCL (p<0.05) and PT 189

(p<0.01) at all loading frequencies. At 0.1 Hz, the dynamic modulus was higher in PCL compared 190

with PT (p<0.05).

191 192

The results of the ultimate tensile testing are presented in Table 2 and Figures 3, 4 and 5.

193

Significant differences in the toe region second-order fit parameter A (Eqs. 3, 4), related to the 194

strain-dependent modulus, was observed in MCL compared with ACL, LCL (p<0.05) and PT 195

(p<0.01), and between PCL and PT (p<0.05). The toe region fit parameter F (Eq. 5) was higher in 196

MCL compared with LCL and PT (p<0.05). No other significant differences were found between 197

the ligaments in the other toe region fit parameters.

198

(11)

10 199

Strain at the toe region end (𝜀𝜀𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡) was significantly higher in PT compared with PCL (p<0.01) and 200

MCL (p<0.05), and significantly higher in LCL compared with PCL (p<0.05). No significant 201

differences in the stress at this strain (𝜎𝜎𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡) between the ligaments were found (Figure 4). The yield 202

stress was significantly higher in MCL than in ACL and PT (p<0.05), while the yield strain showed 203

no significant differences between the ligaments (Figure 4). The ultimate strain was significantly 204

higher in LCL and PT compared with ACL (p<0.05) (Figure 4). The ultimate strength was 205

significantly higher in MCL compared with PT (p<0.01) and ACL (p<0.05). The Young’s modulus 206

was higher in MCL than in ACL and PT (p<0.05). Toughness up to the yield strain (𝐾𝐾𝑑𝑑𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡𝑦𝑦𝑑𝑑) was 207

higher in MCL than in PT (p<0.05) and toughness up to the failure strain (𝐾𝐾𝑢𝑢𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡) was higher in 208

MCL compared with PT and ACL (p<0.05).

209 210

Discussion 211

In this study, we determined experimentally viscoelastic, and quasi-static nonlinear, linear and 212

failure tensile material properties of bovine stifle joint ligaments and patellar tendon. The main 213

results were that 1) LCL is the most viscous at low-frequency loads, and 2) MCL is the stiffest and 214

has the highest strain-dependent modulus and toughness. Furthermore, PT was surprisingly soft 215

and was shown to have many parameters comparable with ACL and PCL, such as the Young’s 216

modulus and toughness. This study provides novel information of the mechanical material 217

properties of bovine knee joint ligaments at the mesoscopic level. This information is also useful 218

in determination of structure-function relationships.

219 220

(12)

11 Based on the phase difference results, LCL seems to be more viscous than the other ligaments at 221

low-frequency loading. It is well known that all tissues are adapted to their specific loading 222

environment. Therefore, it may be that for normal joint function at low speeds or close to static 223

loads the viscous component of the tissue might be beneficial, providing damping effect and 224

stabilizing the joint (Birch, 2013; Reynolds et al., 2017). Since the LCL resists varus rotation, the 225

more viscous behavior of LCL could be an adaptation to frontal plane sway movement, which 226

occurs at frequencies comparable to the ones used in the current study (Giemza et al., 2013). Cattle 227

stand 40 to 50 % of time (Rajapaksha et al., 2015) and thus loading caused by sway may occur in 228

large amounts. To our knowledge, the literature lacks similar comparison of this parameter 229

between knee ligaments. However, the magnitudes of phase differences obtained in this study were 230

comparable to the values reported for human MCL (Bonifasi-Lista et al., 2005; Lujan et al., 2009).

231

The observed behavior could originate from differences in water content (Rumian et al., 2007), as 232

fluid flow affects tissue viscoelasticity, though its effect is more emphasized in compression (Li 233

et al., 2005). Another explanation could be higher collagen content in LCL (Hanada et al., 2014), 234

as collagen viscoelasticity was shown to highly affect the time-dependent behavior of cartilage in 235

tension (Li et al., 2005). Additionally, collateral ligaments have been shown to contain more small- 236

diameter fibrils than ACL, PCL and PT (Rumian et al., 2007), resulting in larger interaction areas 237

between fibrils and other extracellular matrix constituents, which may affect viscoelasticity at the 238

mesoscopic level. Finally, possibly lower elastin content compared to cruciate ligaments (Kharaz 239

et al., 2018) might increase LCL viscosity, as elastin has been thought to be an elastic stabilizer 240

restoring tissue back to its original shape.

241 242

(13)

12 MCL had the highest strain-dependent modulus (Eq. 3, 4), 𝐹𝐹 (Eq. 5, describing also strain 243

dependency in the toe-region (Criscenti et al., 2015)), dynamic modulus, Young’s modulus, yield 244

stress, ultimate strength, toughness at yield and toughness at failure. This means that MCL was the 245

stiffest, strongest and required the most energy prior to yield and rupture among the ligaments and 246

PT. Higher Young’s modulus of MCL compared with ACL is consistent with earlier studies 247

(Butler et al., 1992; Chandrashekar et al., 2006; Chawla et al., 2009; Noyes and Grood, 1976;

248

Pioletti et al., 1999; Quapp and Weiss, 1998) but higher Young’s modulus compared with PT was 249

not (Butler et al., 1986; Eleswarapu et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 1994). The reason for higher values 250

of these material properties of MCL could be its adaptation to the loading environment and 251

surrounding structures. For efficient operation of the knee, the shape and size of MCL is restricted, 252

but the force transmit capability and stiffness are required to control valgus rotation. The results 253

might be explained by the higher collagen content in collateral ligaments (Hanada et al., 2014) and 254

possibly more oriented collagen fibrils along the direction of the loading. Additionally, higher 255

elastin (Kharaz et al., 2018) and GAG (Kharaz 2018, Rumian 2007) contents in cruciate ligaments 256

might explain their differences to MCL, as presumably higher elastin and GAG contents lower the 257

relative amount of collagen. Elastin has been shown to contribute only slightly to the stress-strain 258

behavior outside the toe-region (Henninger et al., 2013) and the role of GAGs is more emphasized 259

in compression (Korhonen and Jurvelin, 2010).

260 261

Rumian et. al (2007) studied the collagen fibril diameters of different ligaments and PT in an ovine 262

model, and found out that the fibril diameter distribution histogram, showing the amount of 263

collagen fibrils with small, medium and large diameters, in PT was more similar with ACL and 264

PCL (bimodal, more high-diameter fibrils) than with MCL and LCL (more small-diameter fibrils).

265

(14)

13 This could partly explain why PT had the Young’s modulus and toughness values closer to cruciate 266

ligaments than collateral ligaments.

267 268

PT had the longest toe region strain, suggesting that it could have larger crimp angles compared 269

with collateral and cruciate ligaments. This was manifested by small strain dependent modulus in 270

the toe region, with significant differences compared to PCL and MCL. The long toe region strain 271

might be needed in normal bovine PT operation, to provide a large operating strain range at rest, 272

standing and walking. Interestingly, patellar tendon did not have larger Young’s modulus 273

compared with ligaments, as could be expected based on the Young’s moduli obtained in earlier 274

measurements on dumbbell-shaped samples (Eleswarapu et al., 2011), bone-ligament-bone 275

complexes (Blevins et al., 1994; Chandrashekar et al., 2012; Flahiff et al., 1995; Haut and 276

Powlison, 1990; Johnson et al., 1994; Stäubli et al., 1999), fascicles (Butler et al., 1986; Haraldsson 277

et al., 2005) or in-vivo subjects (O’Brien et al., 2010). Our values for PT are however similar to 278

those obtained by Rupp et al. (2000) and Wilson et al. (1999) for bone-ligament-bone complexes.

279

Our results differ from those obtained for bovine by Eleswarapu et al. (2011), likely because we 280

used skeletally mature knees as opposed to one-week-old calves, in which ligaments are still 281

developing and the mechanical properties are clearly inferior to the mature joint. The difference 282

with respect to human PT (Blevins et al., 1994; Butler et al., 1986; Chandrashekar et al., 2012;

283

Flahiff et al., 1995; Haraldsson et al., 2005; Haut and Powlison, 1990; Johnson et al., 1994;

284

O’Brien et al., 2010; Stäubli et al., 1999) may be attributed to the difference in anatomy; in addition 285

to patellar tendon, bovine stifle joint has two other tendons connecting patella to tibia, whereas the 286

human knee has only the patellar tendon connecting patella to tibia. However, animals, especially 287

bovine, remain typical when studying the musculoskeletal biomechanics (Cone et al., 2017).

288

(15)

14 289

Due to tissue stiffening as a function of strain rate, which was also evident when comparing the 290

dynamic moduli at different frequencies, it was expected that the sinusoidal loading results in 291

greater modulus compared to the quasi-static test. However, the magnitudes of dynamic modulus 292

were slightly smaller than linear moduli from the ultimate tensile test. The reason for this may be 293

that the strain at which the sinusoidal test was performed was in the toe-region or in the beginning 294

of the linear region for some samples, though pilot measurements showed 8 % to be in the linear 295

region. This could also be the reason for the significantly higher dynamic modulus of PCL (shorter 296

toe region) compared with PT at 0.1 Hz, even though the Young’s modulus obtained from the 297

ultimate test showed no differences. Nonetheless, the strain was well within the physiological 298

range of operation.

299 300

Toe region strains observed in earlier studies for human ligaments and PT with dumbbell-shaped 301

samples (Bonifasi-Lista et al., 2005; Quapp and Weiss, 1998), bone-ligament-bone complexes 302

(Chandrashekar et al., 2012; van Dommelen et al., 2005), fascicles (Butler et al., 1986; Haraldsson 303

et al., 2005) and for rabbit bone-MCL-bone complex (Moon et al., 2006) are smaller than those 304

obtained in this study. Values similar to this study were observed for dumbbell-shaped samples of 305

porcine MCL (Henninger et al., 2013). The reason for the longer toe-region strains in this study 306

could be higher collagen fiber crimp angles combined with higher elastin content. As indicated 307

above, elastin was suggested to provide restorative effect (i.e. return collagen fibers crimped when 308

unloaded) and affect the stress particularly in the toe region (Henninger et al., 2013). Smith et al.

309

(2014) found an elastin content of approximately 10 % of dry weight in canine cruciate ligaments, 310

which could be typical for quadruped animals, as opposed to few percent in humans (Woo et al., 311

(16)

15 2005). Elastin and other structural constituents of these samples will be analyzed later by 312

biochemical and microscopical analyses for further clarification of this matter. For instance, 313

quantitative polarized light microscopy (Spiesz et al., 2018) could reveal differences in the 314

collagen crimp patterns.

315 316

The second-order fit coefficient A (Eq. 3) describes the strain dependent modulus at the toe region 317

and thus how fast the modulus increases with increasing strain. This is the first time when this 318

parameter is determined for ligaments. The observations are consistent with the differences in the 319

toe region strains, so that high toe-region strain results in low strain dependent modulus. As 320

expected, these values (ligament mean values between 754 – 1765 MPa) were substantially higher 321

than those reported experimentally for bovine meniscus (224.78 ± 136.08 MPa (Danso et al., 322

2014)) or cartilage (2.29 ± 1.30 MPa (Danso et al., 2014)). The values for constant D (Eq. 5) of 323

the exponential formula obtained here are of similar magnitude than reported for goat MCL (4.0 ± 324

4.2 MPa (Abramowitch et al., 2004)) and higher compared with bovine meniscus (0.34 ± 0.06 325

MPa (Danso et al., 2014)) or cartilage (0.17 ± 0.04 MPa (Danso et al., 2014)). Constant F (Eq. 5) 326

of the exponential formula describes also the mechanical nonlinearity at the toe region and showed 327

similar trend with the strain-dependent modulus (highest value in MCL). This parameter value was 328

comparable with goat MCL (48.4 ± 23.1 (Abramowitch et al., 2004)), and was similar to bovine 329

meniscus (31.79 ± 9.64 (Danso et al., 2014)) and higher than bovine cartilage (5.11 ± 1.82 (Danso 330

et al., 2014)).

331 332

The similarity of linear region lengths between ligaments and PT indicates that once the collagen 333

fibers are straightened, the strain behavior is similar in the ligaments. Ultimate strain in LCL was 334

(17)

16 the highest but did not show as clear difference with MCL as in Smeets et al. (2017) where LCL 335

had significantly higher ultimate strain than MCL with a mean value in LCL close to 40 %.

336

Toughness values obtained in this study were consistent with the values reported in the literature 337

(Butler et al., 1986; Chandrashekar et al., 2006; Johnson et al., 1994; Race and Amis, 1994), but 338

exhibited high sample-specific variation. However, the results do not show the behavior observed 339

by Smeets et al. (2017) where LCL had higher toughness at failure than MCL. Possible reason for 340

these differences between the studies could be the different age, as ageing-related collagen 341

crosslinks might be more present in the subjects of Smeets et al. (2017) (aged 74 ± 7 years) 342

compared with bovine samples of this study.

343 344

Limitations 345

Limitations of the study, such as clamping-induced stress concentrations, using dumbbell-shaped 346

samples as opposed to bone-ligament-bone complexes, using bovine instead of human samples, 347

have been discussed in detail in the supplementary material.

348 349

Conclusion 350

In conclusion, bovine LCL exhibits more viscosity than the other ligaments at low-frequency loads 351

and MCL has the highest strain-dependent modulus, Young’s modulus and toughness. The 352

observed differences may indicate adaptation of the ligament material properties to their specific 353

physiological function. This study provides novel information of the linear, nonlinear and failure 354

properties, and viscoelastic properties of bovine knee joint ligaments and may aid, to some extent, 355

in proper construction of computational knee joint models. In the future, biochemical and 356

(18)

17 microscopical analysis of the samples will be conducted in order to characterize structure-function 357

relationships.

358 359

Conflict of interest statement 360

Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

361 362

Acknowledgements 363

Financial support from the Academy of Finland (grant 286526) is greatly acknowledged.

364

References 365 366

Abramowitch, S.D., Woo, S.L.-Y., Clineff, T.D., Debski, R.E., 2004. An Evaluation of the Non- 367 Linear Viscoelastic Properties of the Healing Medial Collateral Ligament. Ann. Biomed.

368 Eng. 32, 329–335.

369

Bates, N.A., Nesbitt, R.J., Shearn, J.T., Myer, G.D., Hewett, T.E., 2015. Relative Strain in the 370 Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament during Simulated Jump 371 Landing and Sidestep Cutting Tasks: Implications for Injury Risk. Am. J. Sports Med. 43, 372 2259–2269.

373

Birch, H.L., 2013. Specialization of extracellular matrix for function in tendons and ligaments.

374 Muscles. Ligaments Tendons J. 3, 12–22.

375

Blevins, F.T., Hecker, A.T., Bigler, G.T., Boland, A.L., Hayes, W.C., 1994. The Effects of 376 Donor Age and Strain Rate on the Biomechanical Properties of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone 377 Allografts. Am. J. Sports Med. 22, 328–333.

378

Bonifasi-Lista, C., Lake, S.P., Small, M.S., Weiss, J.A., 2005. Viscoelastic properties of the 379 human medial collateral ligament under longitudinal, transverse and shear loading. J.

380 Orthop. Res. 23, 67–76.

381

Butler, D.L., Guan, Y., Kay, M.D., Cummings, J.F., Feder, S.M., Levy, M.S., 1992. Location- 382 dependent variations in the material properties of the anterior cruciate ligament. J. Biomech.

383 25, 511–518.

384

Butler, D.L., Kay, M.D., Stouffer, D.C., 1986. Comparison of Material Properties in Fascicle- 385 Bone Units From Human Patellar Tendon and Knee Ligaments. J. Biomech. 19, 425–432.

386

Butler, D.L., Noyes, F.R., Grood, E.S., 1980. Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer 387 in the human knee. A biomechanical study. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 62, 259–270.

388

(19)

18 Chandrashekar, N., Mansouri, H., Slauterbeck, J., Hashemi, J., 2006. Sex-based differences in 389 the tensile properties of the human anterior cruciate ligament. J. Biomech. 39, 2943–2950.

390

Chandrashekar, N., Slauterbeck, J., Hashemi, J., 2012. Effects of cyclic loading on the tensile 391 properties of human patellar tendon. Knee 19, 65–68.

392

Chawla, A., Mukherjee, S., Warhatkar, H., Malhotra, R., 2009. Dynamic Characterization of 393 Bovine Medial Collateral Ligaments, in: Proceedings of IRCOBI (Interantional Research 394 Council on the Biomechanics of Injury) Conference 2009, York, UK.

395

Chokhandre, S., Colbrunn, R., Bennetts, C., Erdemir, A., 2015. A Comprehensive Specimen- 396 Specific Multiscale Data Set for Anatomical and Mechanical Characterization of the 397 Tibiofemoral Joint. PLoS One 10, 1–18.

398

Cone, S.G., Warren, P.B., Fisher, M.B., 2017. Rise of the Pigs: Utilization of the Porcine Model 399 to Study Musculoskeletal Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering During Skeletal Growth.

400 Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 00, 1–18.

401

Criscenti, G., De Maria, C., Sebastiani, E., Tei, M., Placella, G., Speziali, A., Vozzi, G., Cerulli, 402 G., 2015. Quasi-linear viscoelastic properties of the human medial patello-femoral ligament.

403 J. Biomech. 48, 4297–4302.

404

Danso, E.K., Honkanen, J.T.J., Saarakkala, S., Korhonen, R.K., 2014. Comparison of nonlinear 405 mechanical properties of bovine articular cartilage and meniscus. J. Biomech. 47, 200–206.

406

Eleswarapu, S. V., Responte, D.J., Athanasiou, K.A., 2011. Tensile Properties, Collagen

407 Content, and Crosslinks in Connective Tissues of the Immature Knee Joint. PLoS One 6, 1–

408 7.

409

Ellis, B.J., Weiss, J.A., 2015. Effects of Aging on the Cellular Function, Healing, and 410 Mechanical Properties of Ligaments, in: Derby, B., Akhtar, R. (Eds.), Mechanical

411 Properties of Aging Soft Tissues. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Cham, pp.

412 167–185.

413

Flahiff, C.M., Brooks, A.T., Hollis, J.M., Schilden, J.L. Vander, Nicholas, R.W., 1995.

414 Biomechanical Analysis of Patellar Tendon Allografts as a Function of Donor Age. Am. J.

415 Sports Med. 23, 354–358.

416

Fung, Y.C.B., 1967. Elasticity of soft tissues in simple elongation. Am. J. Physiol. 213, 1532–

417 1544.

418

Gardiner, J.C., Weiss, J.A., Rosenberg, T.D., 2001. Strain in the Human Medial Collateral 419 Ligament During Valgus Loading of the Knee. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 391, 266–274.

420

Giemza, C., Czech, P., Paluszak, A., Bieć, E., Borzucka, D., Kuczyński, M., 2013. Acute effects 421 of cryotherapy on postural control. Neurosci. Lett. 536, 6–9.

422

Hanada, M., Takahashi, M., Suzuki, D., Abe, M., Matsuyama, Y., 2014. A biochemical study of 423 the distribution of collagen and its crosslinks in knee ligaments and the patellar tendon.

424 Connect. Tissue Res. 55, 378–383.

425

Haraldsson, B.T., Aagaard, P., Krogsgaard, M., Alkjaer, T., Kjaer, M., Magnusson, S.P., 2005.

426

(20)

19 Region-specific mechanical properties of the human patella tendon. J. Appl. Physiol. 98, 427 1006–1012.

428

Haut, R.C., Powlison, A.C., 1990. The Effects of Test Environment and Cyclic Stretching on the 429 Failure Properties of Human Patellar Tendons. J. Orthop. Res. 8, 532–540.

430

Henninger, H.B., Underwood, C.J., Romney, S.J., Davis, G.L., Weiss, J.A., 2013. Effect of 431 Elastin Digestion on the Quasi-Static Tensile Response of Medial Collateral Ligament. J.

432 Orthop. Res. 31, 1226–1233.

433

Johnson, G.A., Tramaglini, D.M., Levine, R.E., Ohno, K., Choi, N.-Y., Woo, S.L.-Y., 1994.

434 Tensile and Viscoelastic Properties of Human Patellar Tendon. J. Orthop. Res. 12, 796–803.

435

Kharaz, Y.A., Canty-Laird, E.G., Tew, S.R., Comerford, E.J., 2018. Variations in internal 436 structure, composition and protein distribution between intra- and extra-articular knee 437 ligaments and tendons. J. Anat. 943–955.

438

Korhonen, R.K., Jurvelin, J.S., 2010. Compressive and tensile properties of articular cartilage in 439 axial loading are modulated differently by osmotic environment. Med. Eng. Phys. 32, 155–

440 160.

441

LaCroix, A.S., Duenwald-Kuehl, S.E., Vanderby Jr., R., 2013. Relationship between tendon 442 stiffness and failure: a metaanalysis. J. Appl. Physiol. 115, 43–51.

443

Li, L.P., Herzog, W., Korhonen, R.K., Jurvelin, J.S., 2005. The role of viscoelasticity of collagen 444 fibers in articular cartilage: Axial tension versus compression. Med. Eng. Phys. 27, 51–57.

445

Lujan, T.J., Underwood, C.J., Jacobs, N.T., Weiss, J.A., 2009. Contribution of

446 glycosaminoglycans to viscoelastic tensile behavior of human ligament. J. Appl. Physiol.

447 106, 423–431.

448

McCulloch, C.E., Searle, S.R., Neuhaus, J.M., 2008. Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models, 449 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey.

450

Moon, D.K., Woo, S.L.Y., Takakura, Y., Gabriel, M.T., Abramowitch, S.D., 2006. The effects of 451 refreezing on the viscoelastic and tensile properties of ligaments. J. Biomech. 39, 1153–

452 1157.

453

Noyes, F.R., Grood, E.S., 1976. The Strength of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Humans and 454 Rhesus Monkeys. J. bone Jt. Surg. 58, 1074–1082.

455

O’Brien, T.D., Reeves, N.D., Baltzopoulos, V., Jones, D.A., Maganaris, C.N., 2010. Mechanical 456 properties of the patellar tendon in adults and children. J. Biomech. 43, 1190–1195.

457

Pioletti, D.P., Rakotomanana, L.R., Leyvraz, P.-F., 1999. Strain rate effect on the mechanical 458 behavior of the anterior cruciate ligament–bone complex. Med. Eng. Phys. 21, 95–100.

459

Quapp, K.M., Weiss, J.A., 1998. Material Characterization of Human Medial Collateral 460 Ligament. J. Biomech. Eng. 120, 757–63.

461

Race, A., Amis, A.A., 1994. The mechanical properties of the two bundles of the human 462 posterior cruciate ligament. J. Biomech. 27, 13–24.

463

(21)

20 Rajapaksha, E., Winkler, C., Tucker, C.B., 2015. Effect of rubber flooring on dairy cattle

464 stepping behavior and muscle activity. J. Dairy Sci. 98, 2462–2471.

465

Reynolds, R.J., Walker, P.S., Buza, J., 2017. Mechanisms of anterior-posterior stability of the 466 knee joint under load-bearing. J. Biomech. 57, 39–45.

467

Roldán, E., Reeves, N.D., Cooper, G., Andrews, K., 2017. In vivo mechanical behaviour of the 468 anterior cruciate ligament: A study of six daily and high impact activities. Gait Posture 58, 469 201–207.

470

Rumian, A.P., Wallace, A.L., Birch, H.L., 2007. Tendons and Ligaments Are Anatomically 471 Distinct But Overlap in Molecular and Morphological Features - A Comparative Study in 472 an Ovine Model. J. Orthop. Res. 25, 458–464.

473

Screen, H.R.C., Lee, D.A., Bader, D.L., Shelton, J.C., 2004. An investigation into the effects of 474 the hierarchical structure of tendon fascicles on micromechanical properties. Proc. Inst.

475 Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 218, 109–119.

476

Smeets, K., Slane, J., Scheys, L., Claes, S., Bellemans, J., 2017. Mechanical Analysis of Extra- 477 Articular Knee Ligaments. Part One: Native knee ligaments. Knee 24, 949–956.

478

Smith, K.D., Clegg, P.D., Innes, J.F., Comerford, E.J., 2014. Elastin content is high in the canine 479 cruciate ligament and is associated with degeneration. Vet. J. 199, 169–174.

480

Spiesz, E.M., Thorpe, C.T., Thurner, P.J., Screen, H.R.C., 2018. Structure and collagen crimp 481 patterns of functionally distinct equine tendons, revealed by quantitative polarised light 482 microscopy (qPLM). Acta Biomater.

483

Stabile, K.J., Pfaeffle, J., Weiss, J.A., Fischer, K., Tomaino, M.M., 2004. Bi-directional

484 mechanical properties of the human forearm interosseus ligament. J. Orthop. Res. 22, 607–

485 612.

486

Stäubli, H.U., Schatzmann, L., Brunner, P., Rincón, L., Nolte, L.-P., 1999. Mechanical Tensile 487 Properties of the Quadriceps Tendon and Patellar Ligament in Young Adults. Am. J. Sports 488 Med. 27, 27–34.

489

Taylor, K.A., Cutcliffe, H.C., Queen, R.M., Utturkar, G.M., Spritzer, C.E., Garrett, W.E.,

490 DeFrate, L.E., 2013. In vivo measurement of ACL length and relative strain during walking.

491 J. Biomech. 46, 478–483.

492

van Dommelen, J.A.W., Ivarsson, B.J., Jolandan, M.M., Millington, S.A., Raut, M., Kerrigan, 493 J.R., Crandall, J.R., Diduch, D.R., 2005. Characterization of the Rate-Dependent

494 Mechanical Properties and Failure of Human Knee Ligaments. SAE Tech. Pap. 2005-01- 495 0293.

496

Woo, S.L.-Y., Lee, T.Q., Abramowitch, S.D., Gilber, T.W., 2005. Structure and Function of 497 Ligaments and Tendons, in: Mow, V.C., Huiskes, R. (Eds.), Basic Orthopaedic

498 Biomechanics & Mechano-Biology. Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia, pp. 301–342.

499

Woo, S.L., Debski, R.E., Withrow, J.D., Janaushek, M.A., 1999. Biomechanics of Knee 500 Ligaments. Am. J. Sports Med. 27, 533–543.

501

(22)

21 502

503

(23)

22

Table 1. Dynamic modulus 𝐸𝐸𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 (mean ± SD) at different loading frequencies for ACL, LCL, MCL, PCL and PT.

504

𝐸𝐸𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 (MPa)

0.1 𝐻𝐻𝑧𝑧 0.5 𝐻𝐻𝑧𝑧 1 𝐻𝐻𝑧𝑧 ACL 163.94 ± 73.98 * 168.73 ± 76.84 * 171.14 ± 78.43 *

LCL 181.66 ± 135.26 * 187.80 ± 140.20 * 190.08 ± 142.14 *

MCL 288.51 ± 102.56 296.60 ± 105.48 298.56 ± 105.96

PCL 214.26 ± 126.21 o 220.15 ± 130.55 222.37 ± 130.26

PT 115.77 ± 93.03 o** 119.38 ± 97.18 ** 120.45 ± 99.14 **

Significant differences compared to MCL are indicated with * (p<0.05) and ** (p<0.01).

505

Significant difference between PCL and PT is indicated with o (p<0.05).

506 507 508

Table 2. Nonlinear mechanical parameters (Eqs. 3, 5) and the length of the linear region for the different ligaments (mean ± SD).

509

A (MPa) B (MPa) C (MPa) D (MPa) F (-) 𝜀𝜀𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 (%)

ACL 1021.47 ± 405.98 * 2.95 ± 7.83 0.19 ± 0.06 1.23 ± 0.50 24.73 ± 6.33 11.38 ± 1.24

LCL 1085.98 ± 917.43 * 1.20 ± 21.04 0.24 ± 0.17 3.25 ± 5.50 19.91 ± 10.90* 12.29 ± 1.85

MCL 1765.05 ± 588.93 2.93 ± 10.58 0.19 ± 0.09 1.38 ± 0.42 30.27 ± 8.23 11.85 ± 1.32

PCL 1466.99 ± 819.65 o -1.16 ± 18.49 0.22 ± 0.10 2.34 ± 3.57 26.65 ± 12.21 12.33 ± 2.05

PT 753.85 ± 468.65 o** 0.69 ± 14.04 0.28 ± 0.24 1.26 ± 0.61 20.17 ± 4.69* 11.26 ± 1.16

Characterization of the toe region with the fits σ= Aε2+ Bε+ C and σ= D�e1�. 𝐴𝐴 and 𝐹𝐹 describe 510

the strain dependency of the modulus, 𝐵𝐵 the initial modulus and 𝐶𝐶 and 𝐷𝐷 are constants.

511

Significant differences compared to MCL are indicated with * (p<0.05) and ** (p<0.01).

512

Significant difference between PCL and PT is indicated with o (p<0.05).

513 514

(24)

Figure captions

Figure 1. A dumbbell-shaped tensile test sample was cut from the central part of the ligament (a) and then subjected to tensile testing (b). Schematic presentation for sinusoidal (c) and ultimate testing (d) with certain analyzed parameters indicated.

Figure 2. Mean (± SD) phase difference at different loading frequencies for ACL, LCL, MCL, PCL and PT. Significant differences are indicated with * (p<0.05) and ** (p<0.01). The used frequencies simulate for example standing, sway or slow walking (0.1 Hz, 0.5 Hz) or walking (1 Hz).

Figure 3. Mean (± SD) stress-strain curves from the ultimate tensile tests of all the samples.

Figure 4. Mean (± SD) toe region end point, yield point and ultimate strength of the samples.

Significant differences are indicated with * (p<0.05) and ** (p<0.01).

Figure 5. Mean (± SD) Young’s modulus, toughness at yield and toughness at failure for different ligaments.

(25)

Stress (MP a)

Strain (%)

Toe region end

Yield point

Ultimate strength

K ult (grey area)

E=

Δ ε Stress (MP a) Strain (%) Δσ

Time (s)

A σ A ε

a b

c d

Δσ Δ ε

(26)

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Phase dif ference ( ) γ °

0.1 Hz 0.5 Hz 1 Hz

**

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

*

** ** *

* **

**

10

ACL LCL MCL PCL PT ACL LCL MCL PCL PT ACL LCL MCL PCL PT

(27)

ACL

Stress (MP a)

60

10 30 40 50

20

0

Strain (%)

5

0 10 15 20 25 30

LCL

Stress (MP a)

60

10 30 40 50

20

0

Strain (%)

5

0 10 15 20 25 30

PT

Stress (MP a)

60

10 30 40 50

20

0

Strain (%)

5

0 10 15 20 25 30

MCL

Stress (MP a)

60

10 30 40 50

20

0

Strain (%)

5

0 10 15 20 25 30

PCL

Stress (MP a)

60

10 30 40 50

20

0

Strain (%)

5

0 10 15 20 25 30

(28)

*

*

**

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

Stress (MP a)

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Strain (h) Toe region end

ACL MCL PCL PT LCL

2 4 6 8 10 12

* *

Yield point

Strain (h)

Stress (MP a)

10 14 50 40 30 60

18 20

22 24 26

20 16

**

*

*

*

Ultimate strength

Strain (h)

Stress (MP a)

70

28 30

10 50 40 30 60

20

18 20 22 24 26

16

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

ACL MCL PCL PT LCL

ACL MCL PCL PT LCL

(29)

100 200 300 400

0 0

2 4 6

* 8

* * *p<0.05

* *

ACL LCL MCL PCL PT ACL LCL MCL PCL PT

K yield (MP a) K failure (MP a)

Y oung' s m odulus (MP a)

(30)

Supplementary Material 1

Sample preparation 2

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medial collateral ligament 3

(MCL), lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and patellar tendon (PT) were carefully dissected from 4

10 bovine stifle joints, obtained from an abattoir, aged 14 to 22 months. The samples were 5

immersed in a phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution and stored in a freezer (-20 °C) 6

immediately after dissection. Prior to the biomechanical measurement, the sample was allowed to 7

thaw at room temperature, after which a dumbbell-shaped tensile test piece was cut from the central 8

part of the sample (Figure 1a). First, a slice was cut with two parallel razor blades to obtain a 9

desired thickness (approximately 1.8 mm), and then the slice was cut with a custom punch tool to 10

obtain the desired width (approximately 2.0 mm) and dumbbell-shape. Test pieces were cut so that 11

collagen fibers were running along the longitudinal direction. Small dumbbell-shaped specimens 12

were used, because the size and shape were constant in all samples, and reliable material properties 13

could be obtained. Cross-sectional area was determined by measuring the thickness and width with 14

a microscope and assuming an elliptical shape (Duenwald et al., 2009; Eliasson et al., 2007;

15

Provenzano et al., 2001). This assumption was verified accurate by measuring the area of an 16

additional sample directly from its cross-section. Double-sided sandpapers (Mirox P80, Mirka Oy, 17

Uusikaarlepyy, Finland) were glued (Loctite Precision, Henkel AG, Düsseldorf, Germany) on the 18

ends of the sample, resulting in a test length of approximately 10 mm, and the specimen was placed 19

between tensile testing clamps, using a moment of 4 Nm to tighten the clamp screws (Figure 1b).

20

This way, a firm attachment of the sample was achieved, and no slipping was observed, as 21

observed in preliminary repeatability tests. The specimen was in PBS solution at room temperature 22

during the measurement.

23 24

(31)

Mechanical testing 25

Mechanical testing was carried out using a material testing system comprised of a controller 26

(Newport, Irvine, CA, USA), a linear actuator (Newport, Irvine, CA, USA; resolution 0.1 µm) and 27

a 25 lb load cell (Model 31/AL311BL, Honeywell, Columbus, OH, USA), controlled by a custom- 28

made LabView software (version 10.0, National Instruments Corporation, Austin, TX, USA). The 29

zero-load length was established by applying a tensile stress of 0.05 MPa (Henninger et al., 2013).

30

The sample was preconditioned with 2 % strain amplitude for 10 cycles using 0.05 mm/s velocity, 31

after which it was allowed to recover for 2 minutes before determining the zero-load length again.

32

Commonly, preconditioning has been performed using similar strains, number of cycles and 33

speeds (Chokhandre et al., 2015; Criscenti et al., 2015; Quapp and Weiss, 1998; Stabile et al., 34

2004) once prior to the test. In this study, the protocol (10 cycles, 2 % strain, zero-load length 35

determination) was repeated five times, which, in preliminary testing, was found to produce a 36

stable zero-load length and more repeatable results. After preconditioning, the sample was allowed 37

to recover for 10 minutes prior to verifying the zero-load length and commencing the experiments.

38 39

Discussion 40

In the toe region parameters (A, B, D, F) and Young’s moduli, the variability was the highest in 41

LCL and PCL. This originates likely from biological variation, but it could also imply that those 42

tissues adapt to the loading by material properties rather than by geometry. It could also indicate 43

that the exact material properties of LCL and PCL are not as crucial to the knee joint function as 44

the material properties of ACL, MCL and PT. This suggestion is partly supported by a 45

computational study of Dhaher et al. (2010), where variation of the ACL material parameters 46

(32)

affected most to patellar rotation, tilt and contact stress response sensitivity, with also a 47

pronounced effect of MCL and LCL.

48 49

Limitations 50

Clamping of the samples induces a complex stress state close to the junction. For this reason, 51

rupture could sometimes occur near the clamp. Often the initial rupture location was not clearly 52

seen in the sample, which made it difficult to assess whether or not an unfavorable rupture at the 53

clamps had occurred. We made a statistical assessment of outliers in yield and ultimate data to 54

investigate for an early rupture. The values were normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test), and 55

there were no outliers to suggest an early rupture (Grubbs’ test). Hence no samples were excluded 56

from the analyses.

57 58

The tensile test samples were cut from the central part of the ligaments. ACL samples were cut 59

from the anteromedial bundle, though the bundle division was not as clear as with humans. PCLs 60

exhibited no bundle structures. The samples were cut so that fascicles were running along the 61

longitudinal direction, however, the cutting tool was positioned along the longitudinal direction by 62

hand based on visual cues. To minimize the error, the same person cut all the samples with the 63

same tool.

64 65

We used small dumbbell-shaped samples in order to get reliable material properties at a 66

mesoscopic level through constant size and shape. Material properties could be difficult to obtain 67

using bone-ligament-bone complexes, since the cross-sectional area and length are challenging to 68

determine. Studies using bone-ligament-bone complexes hence report typically only structural 69

(33)

level properties of the entire ligaments (e.g. stiffness in N/mm) (Kim et al., 2014; Robinson et al., 70

2005; van Dommelen et al., 2005; Wijdicks et al., 2010; Wilson et al., 2012). The size was large 71

enough to encompass several fascicles and a decent amount of interfascicular matrix. However, 72

the used test setup may limit the fascicle sliding, occurring in-vivo for example during joint angle 73

change, and interfascicular matrix deformation, and care should be taken when comparing our 74

loading to in-vivo situation.

75 76

Bovine samples were used in this study. As a quadruped animal, with a stifle joint different to a 77

human knee joint, the results are not directly applicable to human knees. Care should be taken if 78

implementing the material parameter values obtained here to computational models of the human 79

knee. Hopefully later it can be clarified how the tissue properties in bovine correspond to those of 80

humans. This data is however useful in the analysis of structure-function relationships.

81

Nevertheless, biochemical composition of human and bovine ligaments and PT are similar. For 82

example, reported textbook values for collagen content per dry weight in knee ligaments are 83

between 70 and 80 % (Woo et al., 2005) and mean values of bovine ligaments have been shown 84

to range from 71 to 87 % (Eleswarapu et al., 2011). In human ligaments and PT, these values have 85

been reported up to 73 % (Hanada et al., 2014; Samiric et al., 2009; Suzuki et al., 2008; Young et 86

al., 2011). It is also worth noting that several studies that have investigated the tensile properties 87

of cartilage and meniscus (Charlebois et al., 2004; Danso et al., 2014; Li et al., 2005; Sasazaki et 88

al., 2006) have used bovine of the same age as used here. Results of those studies can be compared 89

with ligament properties of the present study (see more in the Discussion). Bovine stifle joint was 90

used due to availability of the material from healthy knee joints and for best comparability to the 91

Viittaukset

LIITTYVÄT TIEDOSTOT

To test this hypothesis, we estimated the biomechanical properties (instantaneous and equilibrium moduli) of healthy and naturally degenerated bovine patellar cartilage and

In study IV, an extensive set of NIRS measurements and associated reference properties of equine articular cartilage were released in an open data publication to further facilitate

Tutkittavista teräsmateriaaleista (rakennusteräs, sinkitty teräs, kromisinkitty teräs, poly- esteriprimeroitu teräs, maalattu teräs) määritettiin pintaenergiaominaisuudet ennen ja

By using the values of the material parameters in the preliminary anal- ysis (Table 1), tibial reaction forces in the models with elastic, hyperelastic and porohyperelastic

By using the values of the material parameters in the preliminary anal- ysis (Table 1), tibial reaction forces in the models with elastic, hyperelastic and porohyperelastic

Samples were pooled based on the main OARSI grade (i.e., according to integer grade values) to healthy with intact surface (OARSI grades 0–1), early OA with fibrillation and

Whereas, in the equilibrium modulus-based grouping, the presumably OA group had lower dynamic modulus and higher phase difference compared to the presumably healthy group,

Abstract: In this study, mechanical properties of bovine knee ligament and tendon samples were estimated using near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).. Properties related to