,l
INTERNATIONAL
IMS-ILAS WORKSHOP ON
MATRIX METHODS FOR
STATISTICS
4
&
5 Decemb er\992 University of Auckland
New Zealand
'9
ELo.;
O.E oF Oa dLUQ -no
atr
d 5.i o
cd
O
! I E
ECdo
.9E.EIE.E;.Ex
'5-?
atrobDE€
!.8 yr b u EA
<gd6
>9 h I
*eLEoaZ
!> ii tr
F o c-
63 €B
EH F.9 .F&5
E trE
6oQltH E
= 3-P.Ei x
F.B:EH;5?
-9A.EA>A
-: d€- o C
.ytbbqE!r
>oooEa
AFFP &i
o)<4 OY:
ooxd6Y
o'o.Y
o oc
a-
o (;E .so
*o
9N!z
.ov
EA
du
+
.6
n,A:l \it n(iJ J
8
'+
8
c..l
oh oo (Jo
€
cn
tt
O
I
cJT 8d
z an.D eu,
!o qou, o
rO
ou
=
F an
!) ca
o
!
'd +:
oVoE
&5ao r)). or
€2 j:
v)o t- O\
aE
Bs
tJs
o)
If,
J
Ln (J -vd
o .ooo (Jo
8.b
ql e
o ch
o
J
za\
G<6
E Bs
F r=ot=>o.c
ds bo
'iEcP
dC(*F -t'ctr.:a
.8r
EIO-v) gr
ho \ o;- ou-Joo=-.\
o >< g !
'f,';x;ct
--bu,q i
->5V
€'E"r 9 ;
'tr)??= i
rn;Eb o
e h.- ! ;
" FA b O
6t\6tr--
lvo:i 6
h ritA I *
lE6:E:M,.o-
Fd\
tr&; c Y'
:gEE t
'.2'.i ! :
EZ6 i o
9. A
E'a t
o-@tc
H33.9 bex E: Et u, :-3
U", tr h: t+ >ro.-o
ts€; 3
d=., rhre
^ YEE>!E 9
0*6c:;:E# 3 snE
'5o=9uu- acE:!
r:!9c'r
AE.E3 d EEA
iE3.s f. ===
U)o F.o +o +a o
o@
o-o1
b9
Xtr 3
E8
Fo-=n
CJ
o-U o5 o?
:' E's
o2E
./>
5J9 ,h
=E co Fo
C +o
C
.(o Nz EA
-o
c6i!!
a
VB
ro N\.o E .c d
o-ooo o>
o;ntb UuAC
oO
'i c: .;
o-=oq 9r
EZ
oc-o 2t) ooFit 6oo!
oo O*
o.o2oc
EE 9
cT 1i F
*EgT& gEXE
€.2-gs
qi'6d-5 ai o 9b t:
Y 5 &rc Q
o e -'> o
&P dP fE
\o F-efi
\o \o€O
o
cd
o
!o o E
E
do o
-o a
e9>o
.= F! o
a>OX
ELo:
9;:
-od :Evo '5=
;doH
o 'tt
PA
=!)td
.:
o!.c h= =b
:e05 E50o*tr 6"
rC-oD
E E.n
5 q
zE E grn 6T c
or bb:'64 9.
F 8 FiE:E
YF fiI,; g
Eta q.E 30€ '"1 il
cxrk-vo
ov ou -!
h: o: q
oOm
'J oi oi
O.iO'-i .-.: .i
oo 'd o
!c
o J' 'E .Ex :
INTERNATIONAI. IMS-ILAS WORKSHOP ON MATRIXMETHODS
FOR STAT'ISTICS
Auckland, New Zealand 4-5 December 1992
ABSTRACTS
Characterizing Invariant Convex Functions of Matrices James V. Bondar and Alastair J. Scott
Carleton University
anclUniversity of Auckland
Some years ago, C. Davis (1957) showed that the invariant convex functions on the class of symmetric matrices are precisely the functions that are convex increasing functions of the eigenvalues. (Here "invariant" rneans invariant under the similarity transformation
O
--+ OMO'where O is orthogonal.)In
thistalk
we showthat
the invariant convex functions on the class of all matrices are precisely those func.tions of the singular valuesthat are both convex and weak Schur convex. (Here "invariant" means invariant under the transformation
M
-+ OtMOz where the O; are orthogonal.)It
has been known for some tirne that increasing symrnetrix convex func.tions of the squares of the singular values are rnatrix convex. Bondar (1985) strengthens Schwartz' resultsto
increasing sylnmetric convex functions of the singular values. Here we showthat to be a convex, weak Schur convex function of the singular values is necessary and sufficient for matrix convexity. We also derive sufficient conditions
that
are simpler to apply in practice.References
J. Bondar (1985). Convexity of acceptance regions of multivariate tests.
Linear Algebra Appl.,67: 195-199.
C. Davis (1957). Al1 convex invariant functions of Hermitian matrices. Arch. Math.,
8:
276-278.Application of a Generalizecl Matrix Schwarz hrequality Evaluation of Biasecl Estimation in Linear Regression
J. S. Chiprnan
unive
rsi\o
l}fi['..' ", "
In the general linear regression rnoclel, three estiurators are considered: (1) the Gauss-
Markoff estimator; (2) the Gauss-Marlioff estirnator subject to a set of linear restrictions on the regression-coefficient vector; (3) the Theil-Goldberger estirnator with uncertain linear restrictions corresponding to the certain ones of (2). This third estimator is styied tlre generalized ridge estimator.
It
is shown, generaliztng a result of Toro-Vizcarrondo and Wallace,that
a sufficient condition for both estimators (2) and (3)to
have lower matrix-mean-square error than estimator (1) is that the noncentrality parameter arisingin
the F-test for the restrictionsin
(2) should be less than1.
A generalization is also obtained of the Hoerl-Kennard result that for sufficiently small but positive values of their l.-parameter, estimator (:3) has lower matrix-mean-square error than estimator (1).References
.L S. Chipmarl, "On least squares
with
insufficient observations,"J.A.S.A.59
(1964),1078-1111.
A. E. Hoerl and R. W. Kennard, "Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problerns," Techtrometric-s 12 (1970), 55-67.
C. Toro-Vizcarrondo and
T.
D. Wallac€,"A
test of the rnean square error criterion for restrictions in linear regression," J.A.S.A. 63 (1968), 558-572.Statistical Contribr.rtions to Matrix Methocls Richard Wiiliani Farebrother
University of Manchester
The Formalisation of Matrix Algebra in the 1850s and 1860s was preceded by a number of significant developments, sorne of which
(*)
are to be found in statistics works:1. Cauchy's use of rnodem subscript notatiou for matrix eiements.
2. Gauss's use of matrix rnultiplication when trausforming variables
in
a quadratic form.3.*
Mayer's prototype of the elirnination procedure.4.*
Gauss's identification of a iinearly dependent systern of equations.5.*
Gauss's elirnination procedure and the implicit LU decomposition of a square matrix.6.*
Clauss's definition of a generalised inverse of a tnatrix.7.*
Clauss's derivation of a LDL' decomposition of a symmetric matrix.8.*
Gauss's least squares updating fortuulas.9.*
Gauss's proof that the inverse of a symrnetric matrix is itself syrnmetric.10. Cauchy's latent value decomposition of a 3
x
3 rnatrix.11.* Laplace's derivation of an orthogonalisation procedure subsequently rediscovered by Gram and Schmidt.
12.* Donkin's definition of an orthogonal basis for the orthogonal courplement of a rna-
trix.
13. Jacobi's characterisation of the least squares solution as a weighted sum of subset estimates. This ciraracterisation of the Least Squares solution as a weighted sum of subset estimates by C)laisirer and Subrahrnaniarn.
Later Contributions Include:
14.* Thiele's discussion of the canonical form of the linear model.
15.* The Singular value decomposition derived by Eckart and Young.
i6.*
The so-callecl Gur.r-Mu.kov theorem is clue to Ciauss alone.17.* The generalisation of this theoren usually attributed to Aitken would seem to be due to Plackett.
Stationary Distributions and Mean First Passage Times in Markov Chains using Generaltzed Inverses
Jeffrey J. Hunter
Massey University
The determination of the mean first passage tirnes in finite irreducible discrete tirne Markov chains requires the computation of a generalized inverse of .I
-
P, where P is thetransition matrix of the Markov chain, and also knowledge of the stationary distribution of tlie Markov chain. Generalized inverses can be used to find stationary distributions.
Tire linking of these two procedures and the cornputation of stationary distributions using various multi-condition generalized inverses is investigated.
Cornbining Inclependent Tqsts For A Cotllmon Mean
-lA"
Ap'irlication of the Parailel Surn of Matrices Thomas Mathew
Departrnent of Mathematics and Statistics ' UniversitY of MarYlancl Baltimore
CountYBaltimore,
MarYl and
21228U.S.A.
I.
the co.textof
the recoveryof
inter-block inforrnationin a BIBD,
the problem of conrbining two inclepenclent tests is addressecl in cohen and sackrowitz (1989, Journ'al ofthe.
Ameico,
Stotirtical Association). Apart from the intra- and inter-block F-tests, their cornbi.ecl test uses a correlation type statistic, and this statistic has a positive expected value whe' the null hypothesis of equality of the treatment effects is not true' We showthat a similar statistic
.or b"
definecl in the context of hypotiresis testing for a common lneani'
several indepenclent linear models. Using the properties of the parallel surn of matrices, we also sirowthat
this statistic has a positive expected value wheu the null hypothesis is not true.Invariant Preorcleriirgs of Matrices ancl Approximation Problerns
in N4ultivariate Statistics ancl MDS Renate Meyer
Institute of
Startisticsand Docurnentation Aachen University of Technology,
German.yTlre singular value decomposition of a complex n x k -matrix
A :
Dl=, og4(A)u;vf, witho1r1(A)
2 "pt(A)
the Hennitian matrix A
* A,
plays an important role in various multivariate descriptive statistical nethods, as for exarnple in principal components and analysis, canouical corre-lation analysis, discriminant analysis, and correspondence analysis.
It
is applied to solve the key problem of approximating a given rzx
k-rnatrix (1<
k< ,)
by a matlix of lower rankr < k.
Define A1,;:
Di=rop4(A)u;vf.
The minimum norm rankr
approximation result,b@
- At,l) < 'i(A - G)
for all G with rank (G)(
r, (0 1) was obtainecl by Eckart ancl Young (1936) for the Eucliclean norm$(A:
{tr,O.e.1}. The solution A1,; turned out to be "robust" with respect to the choice of the approxiuration criterion, asit
was extended by Mirsky (1960) to the class of unitarily invariant norms.The objective in the first part of this paper is to generalize this result to an even larger class of real-valued loss functions, encolrlpassing the unitarily invariant norurs. Certain preorderings
{
of complex rnatrices, that occur naturally in the context of multivariate statistics, will be considering in proving uniuersal optimality of A1,;, i.e.A-Ar,r < A-G forall Gwith
rank (G)Sr.
(0.2)Of course, this irnmediately entails (1) for ail real-valued {-monotone functionsTy'.
The second part treats the problem of approximating a Herrnitian
n x n
matrix by a positive-sernidefinite rnatrix of given rank, which is of major relevancein
the context of multidimensional scaling (MDS). Thereby, the hitherto rnost general result of Mathar (1985) is extended and further universally optirnal properties of the classical MDS solu-tion are provided.
Iiey
uords:
singular value decornposition, group induced preorderings, invariant order- ings, weak majorization, principal components analysis, rnultidimensional scaling.References
Eckart, C., Young,
G.
(1936). The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank.P.sy ch o m etrik a L, 2Il -218.'
Jensen, D.R.
(1984).
Invariant ordering Irtequalities in,9tat'istics an d Probability.,Ca.,26-ii4.
and order preservation.
In: Y.L.
Tong, Ed., histitute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward,6
Mathar,
R.
(1985). The best Euclideanfit
to a given distance matrix in prescribed dimen- sions. Linear Algebra Appl. 67, 7-6.Meyer,
R.
(1991) Multidirnensional Scaling as a frarnework for Correspondence Analysis and its extensions,in:
M. Schader, Ed., Analyzirtg and Mod.elin.g Data and l{nowledge, Springer, 63-72.Mirsky,
L.
(1960. Symmetric gauge functions and unitarily invariant norms. Quart. J.Math. Oxford, ,9er. 2,11, 50-59.
A Cornpact Expression For Variance of Sample Second-order Moments in Multivariate Linear Relations
Heinz Neudecker
Department of Actuarial
Scienceand Econometrics University of
Amsterdam"The Netherlands
Satorra (1992) considered the random
(prl)
vector, :iBr;; *
tr,i=7
where the random
(n;rl)
vectors 51 are independent with rneanE(6) :
0 and variance D.(5;), andB;
are LL are coustants(i:t...nr).
He derived the variance of u(zz'), where u(.) is the short version of vec(.).
It is the aim of this note to give a compact expression for the variance and subsequently derive Satorra's result.
Matrix Tiicks Related to Deleting an Observation in the General
Linear Model
Markliu Nurhonen and Simo Puntanen Departrnent of Mathematical - UniversitY of
TarnPereSciencesConsicler the linear motlel U,
X0,V,
whereX
hasfull
colurnn rank andV
is positive definite.when
estimating the pararneters of the model,it
is naturalto
consider the consequences of sorne changes or perturbationsin
the data on the estimates: regression diag'ostics rneasure these consequencies. One fundamental perturbation is omitting oneo, ,",r"rul of the observations from the model. In this paper our interest focuses oll some helpful matrix forrnulas while studying regression diagnostics.
The full CS-cleconrposition of a partitionecl orthogonal tnatrixl
Chris C. Paige
Sc;hool
of Computer
Science,McGill University Montr6al, Qu6bec,
CanaclaH3A 2A7
The C,9-decomposition (CSD) of a 2-block by 2-block partitioned unitary matrix Q
: (fl:rt, 3::r)
reveais the relationships betwee' the si*gular value c{ecornpositions (svDs) of eaclr of the 4 subblocks of Q. The CSD shows each SVD has the form Ql;:
LI;D;iVf ,lor i,
j :7,2,
where each [.I; and I/i is unitary, and each D;1 is essentially diagonal. Here we give a simple proof of this which has no restrictions ou the dirnensions of Q11.The CSD was originally proposed by C. Davis and
W.
Kahan, and is important in finding the principal angles between subspaces (Davis ancl Kahan, Bjorck and Golub), such asin
cornputing canonical correlations between two sets of variates.It
aiso arisesin, for example, the Total Least Squares (TLS) problern. The relationships betrveen the 4
subblock SVDs (in particular the way that each unitary matrix U; or V1 appears in 2 dif- ferent SVDs) has macle the CSD a powerful tool for providing sirnple and elegant proofs
of many useful results invoiving partitioned unitary matrices or orthogonal projectors.
Here we also show the CSD makes several nice rauk relations obvious, aud can be used
to prove some interesting results involving general nonsingular matrices.
I(e.y words: CS decornposition, unitary tnatrices, tank relations.
lJoint Research with
Shanghai 200062, China.
Musheng Wei, Departmenl
10
of Mathematics, East China Normal University,
How Not to use Matric,es when Teacliing Statistics
D.J. Saville
NZ Pastoral Agriculture
Researchlnstitute Ltcl
and
G.R. Wood
Department of Mathematics, university of canterbury
Hic,lclen in the appenclices of some statistical texts is a geometric apProaclt to analysis
of variance ancl
r"gr"rsion.
This approach has been large un-usedin
teachingfor
tworeasons. Firsi, the approach has been considered too hard, and second, this century has been a period in which algebraic methods have been dominant.
It
is the aim of this paper to show that the first reason offered is nonsense: the geornetric approach can make things easy.How cioes the geometric methocl rnalie things easy? The matirematical framework
necessary for the geometric cievelopment of analysis of variance and regression can be reducecl
to
a halclful of straightforward vector ideas. Once these are learnt a concrete methocl is followecl i1 any situation. Three objects are isolated: the observation vector' the 'roclel space ancl hypothesis clirections. All lie in a finite-climensional Euclidearl space.Two routine processes then serve to
fit
the rnodel and test hypotheses: tofit
tire rnodel we project the olservation vector onto the model spac.e) while to test hypotheses we cornpare averages of squared lengths of projections'Why bother
to
cloii.ingr
clifferently? Conventional uretirodsfail to
convey a satis-factory unclerstalcling of the principies which unify these basic statistical methods. The cookbook approach r"n uin, mysterious, while the matrix approach is accessible only to tlrose with lrathernatical rnaturity. The geometric approacir provides
at
elemen'tary b:ut rigorouspath through the rnaterial.It
has been used successfuily by the atrthors to teach,"'.ond-y"ur stuclelts in statistic.s as well as postgraduate stuclents in the applied sciences' These icleas will be cliscussecl, ancl an example of the method in actiou presented.
1l
Problerns with clirect soiritions of the normal eqrrations for rlon-paratnetric aclditive
uro clelsM. G. Sc:hintek
Medical Biornetrics Group, University of Graz Medical
Schoois,A-8036 Graz, Austria
To stucly the funciioual clependence between variables
of
a multivariate regressionproblem
in
a data-driven fashion, non-pal'alletric techniques like Generalized Additive Models (Buja, A., Hastie,T.
and Tibshirani, R.: Linear smoothers and additive rnodels.Artn. Statisf. 1989, 17,453-555) are very useful. Instead of solving the associated uonnal equations a Jacobi-type iterative procedure called backfitting is usually appiied. This is prirnarily done for the purpose of computational efficiency and
to
avoid singularity problens. Butlittle
is known from a theoretical and even less frorn a practical point of view about the quality of the obtained results.Let
us observe (d+
l)-dirnensioual data(r;,X) with z; : (r0r,...,r;a).
Ther1j,...tr,,.j
represent indepenclent observations drawn frorna
randorn vectorX : (*r,,...,i0)anclther;anclXfuifilY;:g(r;)*e;forI<i(zr,wireregisallurl-
known smooth function from Rd to
ft,
and €1r... )en are independent errors. An additive approximation to gd
s6)veo+fsi,xi)
j=1
is aimed at, where 96 is a constant and the
!;s
are any srnooth functions. To make these functions g; identifiableit
is required thatE(g16)):
0 forI
<i (
d. For instance wecan apply thepopular cubicpolynomial srnoothing splines. Let
Sr:
(1+)A.1ifr)-1 bethe snroother matrix (operator) and 1(4 a penaity rnatrix of such a spline. For l.:1,2,...,d
the normal equations form a (nd)
x
(n d) system1) [) :I
:::
,9a ,94 ,94
L9,
,91szlS, Sfl
SzaSau
denoted by
Pg:
QA, where P andQ
are block matrices of smoothing operators ^9r.One way to solve the system wouid be to apply the rnethod of successive overrelaxatiotl, but for d
>
2 we do not l<now how to choose the relaxation parameter. Instead we proposetaking advantage of the specific block structure (especially the position of the /s) of
P. It
allows us to clerive a recursive scheme for the calculation of
P-1.
IJnder non-singularity a direct solution can be obtained by 0:
P-t Qy. This approach is cheap but depends ontlre chosen scatterplot
smoolher.
12
In case of singularity we propose another approach based on a specific type of Tichonow regularization assuming measurement errors of tire dependent variable. Let us have the singular systern
Pr :
Qa. Let a be a regularization parameter, then ihe disturbed system takes tlre forrn (P*P* al)r - P*Qy.The
deviationlli - rll
can be estimated in terms of 7/a and the measurernent error of the right-hand side of the equation. The system can be solved by standard techniques but is cotnputationally expensive.Research supported by Austrian Science Research Fund trant P8153-PIIY,
i3
On the Efficiency of a Linear Unbiased Estimator and on a
Matrix Version of the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality
George P.H. Styan
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McGill lJniversity
Montr6a1, Qu6bec, Canada H3A 2A7
We consider the efficienc.y of a linear unbiased estirnator in the general linear model and
its
conlectionto
a determinant version of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality; we illustrate our results with an example from simple linear regression.I4
Alexander Craig Aitken: 1895-1967
Garry J. Tee
Departrnent of Mathernatics
anclStatistics University of Aucklancl
Alexander Craig Aitken was bom at Dunedin on 1895 April 1, and he attended Otago Boys High Scirool. On holiday
at
his grandparents dairy falm on Otago Peninsula in 1904, he discoverecl the norv-famous breecling colony of the Royal Albatross at Taiaroa Head. His Calvinist grandparents punished hirn for telling such. an unlikely tale but later o1e of his uncles was appointed as a Ranger to protect the colony. After 2 years at the University of Otago he joined the army and was severely wounded at the Battle of the Somme..He completed his studies at the University of Otago, and graduated NI.A.
in
1919 .In
1920 he rnarriecl Mary Betts, who lec.tured in Botany at Otago l-lniversity. He taughtat
Otago Boys High Schooluntil
1923, when Professor R. J.T.
Bell persuaded him to study at the tiniversity of Edinburglt, where he spent the rest of his life. Professor E. T.Whittaker asigned hint the problem of smoothing of data, which had practical iurportance i1 actuarial work. His thesis was of suc.h merit that he was awarded the degree of Doctor of Science, rather than Ph.D.
Aitken s mathentatical rvork was devoted mainly to nurnerical analysis, statistics and linear algebra. He founded the renowr ed Oliver & Boyd series of textbooks and wrote the firsb tlvo himseif: both
Determinants
andMatrices
andStatistical
Mathematicsare recognized as classic textbooks. In numerical analysis he devised many methods which exploited the capabilities of the calculating machines which were then available, and which have proved
to
be funclamentalto
rnuch later workin
scientific cornputing. He gairrecl wide fame as the greatest mental calculator for whom detailed and reliable records exist.lVhittaker retired
in
1946, and Aitken, without any move on his part, was elected to the Chair of Vlathematics at Edinburgh. He was elected Fellow of the Royal Societies of London and of Edinburgh, and Honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand, of the Society of Engineers, and of the Paculty of Actuaries of Edinburgh. He was awarded Honorary Degrees by the Universities of New Zealand and of Glasgow, and he was awarded several rnajor prizes in mathematics. He was an inspiring lecturer and an extremely gentle person, intensely devoted to music, and ire wrote sorne poetry of distinction.In
1963 he published his mernoirGallipoli to the Somme:
Recollectionsof
aNew
ZealandInfantryman,
which was acclairned as a classic account of death and life i1 the trenches. The Royal Society of Literature elected hiur as a Fellow, in recognition of his achievernent in writing that memoir.Aitken retired
in
1965 (in poor health), and ire died at Edinburgh on 1967 November 3, aged 72.15
Use of permatlettts ancl their analogues.in mr.rltivariate galnltta, binonlial and negative
the represeutatiou of binonrial distriltutious
D. Vere-,Jotres
Institute of Statistics and Operations
ResearchVictoria University of Wellington
Wellington, New
ZealanclPorvers of cleterminantal expressions of the form det[1
-TA],7:
diag(tt,t2,...,t,,) occur i1 expressiols for the moment or probability generating functions for several types of nultivariate clistribuiion-
gamrna, negative binomial, binomial at least- The funda- 'rentalideltity
relating the logarithm of the determinant to the trace of the logarithrn of the matrix allows the coefficients in the determinantal expressions to be characterised as multilinear forms in the elements of A, reducing to the detemrinant of A rvhen the poweris
*1, to its
permanent when tire power is-1,
andto
an extension of both concepts(,,alpha-permalents" in the tenninology of Vere-Jones (1988)), for general porvers. This pup"'. will review some properties of these representations and the associated multivariate ,lirtrib.rtions, inclucling extensions to nixtures of binornial or negative biuomial distribu- tio1s, alcl to stochastic processes. Some open questions wiil be urentioned, including the problem of developing effective numerical techniques.
Reference
Vere-Jones, D., "A generalisation of pertlauents and detertninants,"
Li,near Algebra an'd lts Application-s 111 (1988)' 199-124'
16
Andrew
Balemi
Richard William FarebrotherMathematics and
Statistics
Department of Econometrics and Social Statistics University ofAuckland
University of Manchester38 Princes
St
ManchesterPrivate Bag
92019
M13 gPLAuckland
United KingdomNew Zealand
m s rbs rf @cms. mcc. ac. u k balemi@mat.aukuni.ac.nz
Rod
Ball
Arthur R. GilmourHort
Research
NSW Agriculture CentreHort Research lnstitute
NZ
Forest RoadP.O. Box
92169
OrangeAuckland
NSW2800New
Zealand
Australiarod@marc.am.nz
John S.
Chipman
Harold V. HendersonDepartment of
Economics
Statistics and Computing Centre University ofMinnesota
Ruakura Agriculture Centre 1035 Management andEconomics
Hamiiton271 19lh Avenue
South
New ZealandMinneapolis, MN 55455
U.S.A.
henderson@ruakura.cri.nzjchipman@ uminnl.bitnet
Ronald
Christensen
Jefirey J. HunterDepartment of Mathematics and
Statistics
Department of Mathematics & Statistics University oi NewMexico
Massey UniversityAlbuquerque
Palmerston NorthNM
87131
New ZealandU.S.A.
jhunter@massey.ac. nz
f letcher@gopher.unm.edu OR
Peter
Clifford
Snehalata HuzurbazarOxford
University
Department of StatisticsJesus
College
University of GeorgiaOxford
Athensox1
3DW
GA 30602-1952UnitedKingdom
USAclifford@vax.oxf
ord.ac.uk
lata@rolf .stat.uga.eduRichard Jarrett
Department of Statistics University of Adelaide Department of Statistics GPO 498
Adelaide 5001 Australia
rjarrett@stats. adelaid e. ed u.au
Murray A. Jorgensen
Waikato Centre for Applied Statistics University of Waikato
Private Bag 3050 Hamilton
New Zealand maj@waikato.ac.nz
Zivan Karaman Limagrain Genetics B.P. 1 15
63203-Riom Cedex France
Alan J. Lee
Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Auckland
Private Bag 92019 Auckland
New Zealand
lee@math.aukuni.ac.nz
W. Geoffrey MacClement
John Maindonald
Horticultural Research lnstitute Private Bag 92169
Mt Albert Auckland New Zealand
Thomas Mathew
Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Maryland-Baltimore County Catonsville
MD 21228 U.S.A.
mathew@umbc2.u mbc. ed u
Renate Meyer
lnstitute of Medical Statistics and Documentation Aachen University of TechnologY
Germany Pauwelsstr. 30 51 00 Aachen Germany
renate@tolkien. imsd. rwth-aachen
Gita Mishra
Mathematics and Statistics University of Auckland 38 Princes St
Private Bag 92019 Auckland
New Zealand
mishra@mat.aukuni.ac.nz
Chris C. Paige McGill U niversity Mont16al
Montr6al
Simo
Puntanen
George A.G. SeberDepartment o{ Mathematical
Science
Mathematics and Statistics University ofTampere
University of AucklandP.O. Box
607
38 Princes StSF-33101
Private Bag 92019Tampere
AucklandFinland
New Zealandsjp@uta.fi
(il
12t92 seber@mat.aukun i.ac. nzKen Russell
Department of Mathematics University oi Wollongong P.O. Box 1144
Wollongong NSW 25OO
Australia
kgr@its. uow.edu.au
Jai Pal Singh
Department of Agricultural Economics Haryana Agricultural University Hisar
Haryana 125 004 lndia
Garry J. Tee
Mathematics and Statistics University of Auckland 38 Princes St
Private Bag 92019 Auckland
New Zealand
tee@mat.aukuni.ac.nz
Michael G.
Schimek
Jon SteneDepartment of
Psychology
lnstitute ol StatisticsMcGill
University
University of Copenhagen1205 Dr. Penfield
Avenue
Studiestrcede 6Montreal
DK -1455Quebec
CopenhagenCanada H3A
181
Denmarkramsay@ramsay2.psych. mcgill.c
Alastair J.
Scott
George P. H. StyanMathematics and
Statistics
Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of
Auckland
McGill UniversityPrivate Bag
92019
Burnside HallAuckland
805 ouest, rue Sherbrooke Street WestNew
Zealand
Montreal, QuebecCanada H3A 2K6 scott
mt56@m usica.mcgill.ca
Shayle R. Searle Biometrics Unit Cornell University 337 Warren Hall Ithaca
NY 1 4853-7801 U.S.A.
btry@cornella.bitnet
John M. D.
Thompson
Graham R. WoodCot-death
Department of MathematicsUniversity of
Auckland
University of CanterburyPrivate Bag
92019
ChristchurchAuckland
New
Zealand
grw@math.canterbury.ac.nz cotdeath@ccu 1 .auku n i.ac. nzChristopher M.
Triggs
Thomas W. YeeMathematics and
Statistics
Mathematics and Statistics University ofAuckland
University of Auckland38 Princes
St
38 Princes StPrivate Bag
92019
Private Bag 92019Auckland
AucklandNew
Zealand
New Zealandtriggs@mat.auku n i.ac.nz yee@mat.aukuni.ac. nz
Alain C. Vandal
Department of Mathematics and Statistics McGill Universiiy
Burnside Hall
805 ouest, rue Sherbrooke Street West Montreal, Quebec
Canada H3A 2K6
alain@zaphod. math. mcgill.ca
David J. Vere-Jones
lnstitute of Statistics and Operations Research Victoria University
Wellington New Zealand dvj@isor.vuw.ac. nz
Christopher J. Wild
Mathematics and Statistics University of Auckland 38 Princes St
Private Bag 92019 Auckland
New Zealand
wild@mat.aukun i.ac.nz