• Ei tuloksia

Health care professionals’ skills regarding patient safety

N/A
N/A
Info
Lataa
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Jaa "Health care professionals’ skills regarding patient safety"

Copied!
7
0
0

Kokoteksti

(1)

Original Research Article

Health care professionals' skills regarding patient safety

Indrė Brasaitė

a,b,

* , Marja Kaunonen

a,c

, Arvydas Martinkėnas

b

, Vida Mockienė

b

, Tarja Suominen

a

aSchoolofHealthSciences,UniversityofTampere,Tampere,Finland

bFacultyofHealthSciences,KlaipėdaUniversity,Klaipėda,Lithuania

cPirkanmaaHospitalDistrict,Tampere,Finland

article info

Articlehistory:

Received5October2015 Receivedinrevisedform 17March2016

Accepted26May2016 Availableonline30June2016

Keywords:

Patientsafety

Healthcareprofessionals Skills

abstract

Backgroundandobjective: Theimportanceofpatientsafetyisgrowingworldwide,andevery day,healthcareprofessionalsfacevariouschallengesinhowtoprovidesafecarefortheir patients.Patientsafetyskillsareoneofthemaintoolstoensuresafepractice.Thisstudy lookstodescribehealthcareprofessionals'skillsregardingpatientsafety.

Materialsandmethods:DatawerecollectedusingtheskillscaleofthePatientSafetyAtti- tudes,SkillsandKnowledge(PS-ASK)instrumentfromdifferenthealthcareprofessionals (n=1082:physicians,headnurses,nursesandnurseassistants)workinginhospitalsfor adultpatientsinthreeregionalmulti-profilehospitalsinthewesternpartofLithuania.

Results:Overall,theresultsofthisstudyshowthatbasedontheirownevaluations,health careprofessionalswerecompetentregarding theirsafetyskills.Inparticular,theywere competentinthesub-scaleareasoferroranalysis(mean=3.09)andinavoidingthreatsto patient safety (mean=3.31), but only somewhatcompetent in using decision support technology(mean=2.00).Demographicandotherworkrelatedbackgroundfactorswere onlyslightlyassociatedwiththesepatientsafetyskillsareas.Especially,itwasnotedthat nurseassistantsmayneedmoresupportfrommanagersandcolleaguesindevelopingtheir patientsafetyskillscompetence.

Conclusions: Thisstudyhasservedtoinvestigatethegeneralskillsofhealthcareprofes- sionalsinregardtopatientsafety.Itprovidesnewknowledgeaboutthetopicinthecontext oftheBaltic countries andcanthusbeused inthefuturedevelopment ofhealth care services.

#2016TheLithuanianUniversityofHealthSciences.ProductionandhostingbyElsevier Sp.zo.o.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

PeerreviewundertheresponsibilityoftheLithuanianUniversityofHealthSciences.

*Correspondingauthorat:DepartmentofNursing,FacultyofHealthSciences,KlaipėdaUniversity,HerkausManto84,92294Klaipėda, Lithuania.

E-mailaddress:Brasaite.Indre.X@student.uta.fi(I.Brasaitė).

Availableonlineatwww.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect

journalhomepage:http://www.elsevier.com/locate/medici

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2016.05.004

1010-660X/#2016TheLithuanianUniversityofHealthSciences.ProductionandhostingbyElsevierSp.zo.o.Thisisanopenaccess articleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

(2)

1. Introduction

Most recently, the concept of safety skills (i.e. skills and behaviorsthatenhancethesafedeliveryofcare)hasemerged in healthcare literature [1–3]. Safety skills include non- technicalskills suchasleadership, teamwork,communica- tion,co-operation,situationawarenessanddecisionmaking, and also go beyond these to include other behaviors and attributessuchasconscientiousness,vigilanceandhumility.

Importantly,theseskillshavebeenrecognizedasbothcrucial topatientsafetyandalsoashighlytrainable[1].Non-technical skillssupporttechnicalskillssuchassystematicassessment, fluid management during simulation, urethral catheteriza- tion, central venous catheter insertion performed during resuscitation,orcarryingoutsurgery[3].

Researchersinvestigatinghealthcareprofessionals'knowl- edge, attitudes and skills regarding patient safety have remarkedthatalessinvestigatedfieldisthatofsafetyskills [4]. In the varied and complex health care systems seen worldwide, risks frequently occur that impact upon safe patientcare.Healthcareprofessionalshavetomanagethese risksusingtheirknowledgeandskillsincomplexsystems,and alsowhilstmaintainingasafelevelofpatientcare[5].

Physiciansplayanimportantroleintheirworkplacerelated topatientsafety.Assuch,theyneedsafetyskillsintheirdaily activities.Theyshouldalsobeabletorecognizepatientsafety incidents, conduct patient safety incident analysis using protocols,workinateam,learnfromerrors,andbeableto identify actions and recommendations on how to prevent patient safety incidents [6,7]. Nurses have a tradition of enhancing the quality of health care and patient safety, particularlythroughtheuseofproblem-solvingandpractice developmentskills[8].Forexample,nursesmustexercisetheir professionaljudgmentwhenadministeringanymedication, andapplytheirskillsinanygivensituationsoastoactinthe bestinterestsofthepatient[9].

Previousresearchhaslackedanyinvestigationofhowwell healthcareprofessionalsperforminerroranalysis,although errors themselves have been given more coverage. For example,itwasfoundthatmorethan90%ofmedicalerrors intheUnitedStateswerepreventable, andthattoimprove patientsafetyanderrorprevention,itisessentialtoutilize errorreportingmechanisms[10].Improvementsinsurgeons' skillshavebeenreportedasimprovingfollowingtheanalysis of patient safety issues, and a greater understanding and recognitionofpatientsafetyissueswasseenfollowingasafety skillstrainingcourse[1].Also,anotherstudy[11]foundthat safetyimprovementprogramcourses improvedhealthcare professionals'understandingandallowedthemtoconducta root-causeanalysis,andmostagreedthatthisimprovedtheir skillstoleadorbeinvolvedinroot-causeanalysis.Inthesame study,mostofthehealthcareprofessionalsinvolvedgained moreskillsregardingerrorreportingpractices.

Thereareseveralwaystoavoidthreatstopatientsafetyin clinical practice, such as using pressure relieving bedding materialstopreventpressure ulcers,orusingantimicrobial handwashing substancestoreduce infection. Handwashing hasbeen investigatedinseveralhealthcarestudies, and a compliance withhand hygieneprotocols isseen asagood

qualityindicatorofpatientsafety[12].Basedonearlierstudies, apoorcompliancewithhandhygienehasbeenseen.Inone study,only66%ofpersonnelperformedhandhygienebefore or upon entryinto apatient'sroom, and 58%upon exiting the patient's room [13], although a systematic review of handwashingpracticesworldwidehasshowedthatapproxi- mately19%oftheworld'spopulationwashestheirhandswith soapaftercontactwithexcreta[14].

Onewaytoaddsupporttopatientsafetyistoconsiderhow wemayusetechnologytoassistourdecisionmaking,related topatientsafetyissues.Thedegreetowhichtechnologyhas succeeded in supporting health careprofessionals in their decision making has not been investigated in any depth.

Overall however, while studies have shown a general improvementinpatientsafetyskills,theyhavenotreported anydirectpatientbenefits[15].

The healthcare management body hasa central role in helpingstafftodevelopgoodpatientsafetyskills.Withinthis, atransformationalleadershipstylehasbeenshowntohavea biginfluenceincreatingapositivesafetyclimate,contrarytoa morelaisser-fairestyleofleadershipwhichtendstofocusona cultureofblame[16].

Thisstudylookstodescribethekindsofpatientsafetyskills thathealthcareprofessionalshaveandtheassociationsthat relatedindividualbackgroundsfactorshaveonthem.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Datacollection

The data were collected in three regional multi-profile hospitals in the western part of Lithuania. The study participantswerehealthcareprofessionals(physicians,head nurses,nursesandnurseassistants)workinginhospitalsfor adult patients.Permissiontoconductthe studyandcollect datawasgrantedbytheethicalcommitteesofthehospitals whichparticipatedinboththepilotphaseandthemaindata collection.Theethicalconsiderationsrelatedtodatacollection focusedontheethicalprinciplesforresearch,namelythoseof confidentiality,privacy,andthevoluntarynatureofparticipa- tioninthestudy[17].Permissiontousetheinstrumentusedin the study was obtained from the copyright holder of the instrumentbythefirstauthor.

The questionnaire consisted of two parts: background questions,andtheinstrumentwhichmeasuredtherespon- dent's skills regardingpatient safety. Nineteenbackground questionsgathereddataonbasicdemographiccharacteristics (e.g.workposition,age,gender,education,yearsatwork,usual shift,etc.),andfurtherquestionsgatheredinformationabout theirexperiencesofpatientsafety.

Skillswereinvestigatedusingtheskillsscale(13items)of the PatientSafety Attitudes,Skillsand Knowledge(PS-ASK) instrumentdevelopedbySchnall[18]measuringhealthcare professionals'generalskillsrelatedtopatientsafety.Thescale hasthreesubscales:erroranalysis(6items),threatstopatient safety(4items)anddecisionsupporttechnology(3items).The items measuring health care professionals' error analysis relatedtopatientsafetyincludeditemssuchas‘‘participating as a team member of a Failure Mode & Effect analysis,’’

(3)

‘‘interpretingaggregateerrorreportdata,’’‘‘participatingasa teammemberofaroot-causeanalysis,’’‘‘accuratelyentering an error report,’’ ‘‘participating in morbidity and mortality conferences,’’and‘‘supportingandadvisingapeerwhomust decidehowtorespondtoanerror.’’Thesubscaleconcerned withavoidingthreatstopatientsafetyincludeditemssuchas

‘‘using antimicrobial hand washing substances,’’ ‘‘using

pressure relieving bedding materials to prevent pressure ulcers,’’‘‘askingpatientstorecallandrestatewhattheyhave beentoldduringtheinformedconsentprocess,’’and‘‘disclos- inganerrortoapatientand/orfamilymember.’’Theuseof decisionsupporttechnologywasinvestigatedbyitemssuchas

‘‘usingcomputer-based provider order entry,’’ ‘‘using com-

puter-based falls risk assessment,’’ and ‘‘using barcode medicationadministrationsystem.’’Allitemswereratedon aLikert scale(1,notcompetent;2,somewhatcompetent;3, competent;4,proficient;5,expert;and6,notapplicable).

TheinstrumentusedwasoriginallydevelopedintheUS, and wastranslatedfrom English into Lithuanianusingthe back-translation technique [19]. For an evaluation of the instrument'svalidityanditsuseintheLithuaniancontext,a pilotstudywasconductedinoneregionalhospitalinWestern Lithuania. The hospital was selected, based on the multi- profile services it provided for adult patients. Data were collectedfromallofthehealthcareprofessionalsinvolvedin thepilottest(n=90),whichtookplaceinFebruary2014.Based onthepilot,theinstrumentdevelopedbySchnallwasshown to have good psychometric properties in the Lithuanian context, so no changes were made. The scale's reliability wasassessedwithatotalCronbach'salphaof0.91,corrected byinter-itemcorrelation from 0.13to 0.84.TheCronbach's alphavaluesweregoodforthewholescaleinboththepilot andmainstudy,andalsoforthesub-scalesoferroranalysis (0.82and 0.90),threatstopatientsafety(0.53and 0.66),and decisionsupporttechnology(0.91and0.92)(Table1).

Themaindatawerecollectedinthreeregionalhospitalsin May2014.Eachhospitalgavetheirpermissiontoconductthe study, and to have one contact person who circulated questionnaires withenvelopestoall of the staff (N=1687).

Aftertwoweeks,theresearchercollectedthequestionnaires insealedenvelopesfromeachunit.Inordertoincreasethe responserate, anadditional two weeks responsetimewas given.Afterthat,theresearcherreturnedtotheunitstocollect theremainingquestionnaires.Thetotalresponserateforthis studywas64%(n=1082).

2.2. Statisticalanalysis

Descriptivestatisticswereusedtodescribethecharacteristics ofrespondents,thesafetyskillssub-scaleitems,andthescale- level results of the three hospitals. Differences in sample characteristics between hospitals and professional groups

were tested using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Differences in samplecharacteristicsbetweenspecifichospitalsweretested usingtheMann–WhitneyUtest.Datawerepresentedusing mean (SD) or median (IQR) expressions. Any negatively worded items of the instruments were reversed prior to analysis.Theinternalconsistencyofthesafetyskillsinstru- mentsandthesub-scalesoferroranalysisrelatedtopatient safety,avoidingthreatstopatientsafety,anddecisionsupport technologywasmeasuredbycalculatingtheCronbach'salpha for each sub-scale and total field. Associations between respondents' background factors and their patient safety skillswerecalculatedbywayofSpearmancorrelations.Allof thedatawereanalyzedusingSPSS(v.22.0;SPSSInc.,Chicago, IL,USA).APvalueof<0.05wasconsideredtobestatistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Participants

Altogether,1082healthcareprofessionalsparticipatedinthe study. Thebiggest employment groupof participants were nurses(n=756,70%),withsmallergroupsofnurseassistants (n=180, 17%)and physicians (n=146, 14%).Thenumber of returnsfromthethreeregionalhospitalswas:301(28%)from hospital 1; 411 (38%) from hospital 2; and 370 (34%) from hospital 3.Themean ageof participants was46.7 (SD=11) years.Theyhadmanyyearsofworkexperience(mean=24), andworkedanaverageof40hperweekintheirunit.Theunits inwhichrespondentsworkedwereinternalmedicine(n=276, 26%),acute(n=161,15%),psychiatric(n=134,12%),surgical (n=131,12%),andothers(n=380,35%).Giventhatthebiggest groupofparticipantswerenurses,themostcommoneduca- tioninstitutionofthestudyparticipantswasmedicalschool 493 (46%), and the main base-qualifications were a non- university bachelor 130 (12%) and a university bachelor program118(11%).Themajorityofhealthcareprofessionals (n=659,61%)workedvariableshifts,inunitswithanaverage of30.7(SD=17.27)bedsperunit,24.1staffmembersperunit (SD=10.33), and they had an average of 18 patients per workingshift(SD=12.03).Morethanhalfoftheparticipants (n=673,62%)ofthisstudyhadreceivednoinformationabout patientsafetyduringtheirvocationaleducation,butabouthalf (n=589,54%)hadreceivedinformationduringtheircontinu- ing education. Four-fifths (n=866, 80%)of respondentshad reportednopatientsafetyincidentsduringthelastyear.

3.2. Safetyskills

Overall, the results of this study showed that based on their own evaluations, health care professionals perceived

Table1–Safetyskillssub-scalesandpsychometricproperties.

Safetyskillssub-scales Items Cronbach'salphafrompilotstudy Cronbach'salphafrommainstudy

Erroranalysis 6 0.82 0.90

Threatstopatientsafety 4 0.53 0.66

Decisionsupporttechnology 3 0.91 0.92

(4)

themselvesascompetentregardingtheirsafetyskills.They werecompetentinerroranalysis(mean=3.09)andskillsto avoid threats to patient safety (mean=3.31), but only somewhatcompetent inusingdecisionsupport technology (mean=2.00).Inerroranalysis, therespondentsweremost skilledinsupportingandadvisingapeerwhomustdecidehow torespondto anerror. Respondents wereseen tobe least skilledininterpretingaggregateerrorreportdata.Inlookingat theareaofhowskilledstaffwasinavoidingthreatstopatient safety, the highest evaluated skill was seento bein using antimicrobial handwashing substances. Lesser evaluated skillsincludeddisclosinganerrortoapatientand/orfamily member.Aconsiderableamountofvariationwasseeninthe areaofusingdecisionsupporttechnology(Table2).

Basedontheirprofessionandtheareaofhospitalhealth carethatprofessionalsworkedin,somestatisticallysignifi- cantfindingswerefound.Physiciansandnursesweremore skilled than nurse assistants in error analysis (P<0.001).

Nursesweremoreskilledregardingtheavoidanceofthreatsto patientsafetythannurseassistants(P<0.001),andalsomore skilled in using decision support technology than nurse assistants (P<0.01). Differences between safety skills sub- scalesregardingusingdecisionsupporttechnologywerealso seen by hospital, and health care professionals were less skilled in hospitals 1 and 2 than in hospital 3 (P<0.001) (Table3).

Manyof theparticipants demographicand work related backgroundfactorswereslightlyassociatedwithseveralareas of patient safety skills. Especially, the professionals' back- ground factors seem to correlate with their safety skills involvingerroranalysisandtheavoidanceofthreatstopatient safety(Table4).Healthcareprofessionalswithauniversityor collegeeducationwereseentobelessskilledregardingerror analysis( 0.062,P<0.05),inavoidingthreatstopatientsafety ( 0.158,P<0.01),andinusing decisionsupporttechnology ( 0.065,P<0.05),than those who had receivedtheirnurse educationinmedicalschool(vocational).

Healthcareprofessionals withmoreexperience in their primary specialty were seen to be more skilled in error analysis (0.098,P<0.01), avoiding threats to patientsafety

(0.061,P<0.05),andusingdecisionsupporttechnology(0.089, P<0.01).Thosewho receivednoinformation aboutpatient safetyintheircontinuingeducationhadlessskillsinregardto erroranalysis( 0.082,P<0.01)andavoidingthreatstopatient safety( 0.079,P<0.01).

Professionals with more beds per unit evaluated them- selvestobelessskilledinareasrelatedtoavoidingthreatsto patientsafety( 0.090,P<0.01),butmoreskilledwithusing decision support technology (0.072, P<0.05). When more nursesworkedonanightshift,healthcareprofessionalswere seentohavebetterskillsinerroranalysis(0.086,P<0.05)and in avoiding threats to patient safety (0.097, P<0.01). The higherthenumberofpatientsthathealthcareprofessionals usuallyhadper workingshift,the lessskilled theywerein avoiding threatstopatientsafety( 0.077,P<0.05),but the moreskilledtheyseemedtobewithusingdecisionsupport technology(0.067,P<0.05).

Comparingthe safety skillsbetween healthcareprofes- sionals by working unit, some significant differences were found.Thoseworkinginacute andother unitshad signifi- cantly more safety skills regardingerror analysis (P<0.05) comparedtohealthcareprofessionalswhoworkedininternal medicine,surgical,andpsychiatricunits.Healthcareprofes- sionalsworkinginacuteunitshadsignificantlymoresafety skills relating tothe avoidance of threatstopatient safety (P<0.05),thanthoseworkingininternalmedicine,surgical, and psychiatricunits.Nosignificantdifferenceswerefound betweenhealthcareprofessionalsbyworkingunitregarding theirskillsinusingdecisionsupporttechnology.

Amongstrespondentswhohadreportedasafetyincident duringthelastyear,physiciansandnurseshadsignificantly higher safety skills related toerror analysis (P<0.01) than nurseassistants.Alsowithinthesamegroup,skillsrelatingto the avoidance of threats to patient safety (P<0.01) were significantlyhigherfornursesthan nurseassistants.Inthe healthcareprofessionalgroupwhohadnotreportedasafety incident during the last year, physicians and nurses had significantlyhighersafetyskillsrelatedtoerroranalysisthan nurseassistants(P<0.001).Physicianswhohadnotreported safetyincidentsduringthelastyearhadmoreskillsregarding

Table2–Patientsafetyskillsbyparticipants.

Safetyskillssub-scales Mean SD

Erroranalysis

Supportingandadvisingapeerwhomustdecidehowtorespondtoanerror 3.19 0.840

Participatingasateammemberofaroot-causeanalysis 3.18 0.816

ParticipatingasateammemberofaFailureMode&Effectanalysis 3.16 0.834

Accuratelyenteringanerrorreport 3.09 0.792

Participatinginmorbidityandmortalityconferences 3.06 0.925

Interpretingaggregateerrorreportdata 2.93 0.871

Avoidancethethreatstopatientsafety

Usingantimicrobialhandwashingsubstances 3.78 0.734

Usingpressurerelievingbeddingmaterialstopreventpressureulcers 3.12 0.955

Askingpatientstorecallandrestatewhattheyhavebeentoldduringtheinformedconsentprocess 3.08 0.840

Disclosinganerrortoapatientand/orfamilymember 2.75 0.883

Usingdecisionsupporttechnology

Usingcomputer-basedproviderorderentry 1.93 1.210

Usingbarcodemedicationadministrationsystem 1.92 1.193

Usingcomputer-basedfallsriskassessment 1.72 1.090

(5)

Table3–Patientsafetyskillsbyparticipantgroupsandhospitals.

Safetyskillssub-scales Mean(SD) Median(IQR) Chi-square Pvalue

Erroranalysis 67.22 <0.001

Physicians 3.25(0.59) 3.33(0.7)***

Nurses 3.16(0.59) 3.0(0.7)###

Nurseassistants 2.64(0.84) 2.83(1.2)***,###

Total 3.09(0.67) 3.0(0.7)

Avoidancethethreatstopatientsafety 40.41 <0.001

Physicians 3.27(0.58) 3.25(0.7)**

Nurses 3.39(0.59) 3.33(0.8)**,###

Nurseassistants 3.01(0.76) 3.0(1.0)**,###

Total 3.31(0.63) 3.25(0.75)

Useofdecisionsupporttechnology 8.61 0.014

Physicians 1.96(1.13) 1.67(2.0)

Nurses 2.08(1.19) 1.67(2.0)##

Nurseassistants 1.69(0.99) 1.0(1.3)##

Total 2.00(1.16) 1.67(2.0)

Themeandifferencebetweenparticipantsbychi-square(Kruskal–Wallistest).

Themeandifferencebetweenconcreteparticipants(Mann–Whitneytest):

**P<0.01betweenphysiciansandnurses,nurseassistants.

***P<0.001betweenphysiciansandnurseassistants.

##P<0.01betweennursesandnurseassistants.

###P<0.001betweennursesandnurseassistants.

Erroranalysis 3.26 0.196

Hospital1 3.10(0.60) 3.0(0.6)

Hospital2 3.04(0.71) 3.0(0.7)

Hospital3 3.13(0.68) 3.0(0.7)

Total 3.09(0.67) 3.0(0.7)

Avoidancethethreatstopatientsafety 0.97 0.617

Hospital1 3.35(0.64) 3.25(0.8)

Hospital2 3.27(0.60) 3.25(0.7)

Hospital3 3.32(0.66) 3.25(0.8)

Total 3.31(0.63) 3.25(0.75)

Useofdecisionsupporttechnology 26.84 <0.001

Hospital1 1.73(0.97) 1.0(1.3)***

Hospital2 1.70(1.09) 1.0(1.7)###

Hospital3 2.33(1.26) 2.0(2.3)***,###

Total 2.00(1.16) 1.67(2)

Themeandifferencebetweenthreehospitalsbychi-square(Kruskal–Wallistest).

Themeandifferencebetweenspecifichospitals(Mann–Whitneytest):

***P<0.001betweenhospital1andhospital3.

###P<0.001betweenhospital2andhospital3.

Table4–Correlationsbetweenrespondents'backgroundfactorsandtheirpatientsafetyskills.

Demographicandworkrelatedcharacteristics Error analysis

Avoidanceofthreats topatientsafety

Useofdecision supporttechnology

Age 0.060* 0.035 0.021

Education(e.g.medicalschool,college,bachelor,etc.) 0.062* 0.158** 0.065*

Yearsofexperienceinprimaryspecialty 0.098** 0.061* 0.089**

Yearsofworkexperienceingeneral 0.091** 0.027 0.057

Informationaboutpatientsafetyincontinuingeducation 0.082** 0.079** 0.011

Usualshift 0.063* 0.052 0.033

Extrajob 0.054 0.012 0.063*

Receivedhoursregardingextrajob 0.071 0.077 0.207*

Numberofbedsperunit 0.061 0.090** 0.072*

Numberofphysiciansworkinginunitondayshifts 0.035 0.080* 0.007

Numberofnursesworkinginunitondayshifts 0.058 0.116** 0.001

Numberofnursesworkinginunitoneveningshifts 0.101** 0.071 0.055

Numberofnursesworkinginunitonnightshifts 0.086* 0.097** 0.026

Numberofpatientshealthcareprofessionalsusuallyhave perworkingshift

0.041 0.077* 0.067*

* P<0.05.

** P<0.01.

(6)

theavoidanceofthreatstopatientsafetythannurses(P<0.05) andnurseassistants(P<0.01).Nursesinthesamegroupwere significantlymoreskilledthannurseassistants(P<0.001),and had significantly higher safety skills related to decision support technology (P<0.01) than nurse assistants in the samegroup.

4. Discussion

Overall,healthcareprofessionalswerecompetentregarding patientsafetyskills,basedontheirownevaluations.Inmore detail, health careprofessionals werecompetent regarding erroranalysisandtheavoidanceofthreatstopatientsafety, butonlysomewhatcompetentregardingtheiruseofdecision supporttechnologies.Regardingthreatstopatientsafety,they weremost competent in using antimicrobial handwashing substancesandusingpressurerelievingbeddingmaterialsto preventpressureulcers,andoverall,themeanofhandwash- ingskillswasseentobethehighest.Healthcareprofessionals werealsoseentobecompetentinsupportingandadvisinga peerwhomustdecideonhowtorespondtoanerror,andin participatingasateammemberofaroot-causeerroranalysis.

Health care professionals showed the lowest level of competenceregardingtheuseofdecisionsupporttechnology (mean=2.00).Decisionsupporttechnologiesarequitenewin Lithuaniaandnotoftenused.Therefore,inthissetting,hospital managersmayneedtopaymoreattentiontocomputer-based learningwhenplanninghealthcareprofessionals'continuing education in this field. National-level support may also be neededwiththeintegrationofcomputer-basedtechnologies intohealthcareprofessionals'dailypractices,soastopromote patient safety and good quality patient care. This is an especiallyimportantissue,asatthetimeofdatacollection, thehospitalsincludedinthisstudywereatdifferentstagesin using decision support technologies in the area of patient safety.However, theresources, technologyandrelated staff educationshouldbeatsamelevelatsimilartypesofhospitals toensuretheprovisionofequalcareineachpubliclyfunded hospital, therefore we asked how much they used the technologyandnotwhetheritwasavailable.

Based on this study, the central issues related to the respondent'spatientsafetyskillsarewhethertheyweremore experienced and educated, and whether there were more nursesworkingduringnightshifts.Asurprisingresultisthat healthcareprofessionalswithalowerlevelofeducation(such as that received in a medical school for nurses) evaluated themselves as more skilled than those who received their professional education at bachelor level at a university.

However,giventhattheymayalsobedifferentlytrained,have lessresponsibilityetc.,thismayinfluencehowtheyevaluate their skillscomparedtothosewho havedifferentrolesand responsibilities.IntheLithuaniancontext,nursingscienceis veryyoungandbachelorstudieswereonlyestablishedin1990 (initially only available in the city of Kaunas). Most of participantsinthisstudywerenurses,andoneofthemain reasonsfor thiseducationalobservationisthatnurseswho studiedatmedicalschooltendedtogainmorepracticalskills whichtheycouldusemoreeasilyinclinicalpractice.Theresults ofthisstudyalsoconfirmthathealthcareprofessionalstendto

gaintheirsafetyskillsthroughmanyyears'ofexperience,and so their education levelis not the only contributoryfactor.

Safetycompetencewasseentobecloselyassociatedwiththe presenceofmorenursesworkingonnight shifts,andthisis quiteanaturalfindingashavingmorestafftodoclinicalworkis likely tomake for a safer nursing environment. Especially, having a higher staffing ratio is important in managing situationsthatentailahighnumberofpatients.Whenmore nursingpersonnelarepresent,itmayalsobethathealthcare professionalsfeeltheyhaveasupportiveworkingatmosphere andarebetterabletoconsultwithcolleagueswhenfacedwith challengingworkingsituations.

However,itseemedthatmorebedsandahighernumberof patients inthe unit poseda threattopatient safety skills.

According to the Lithuanian Ministerof Health Order [20], nursesshouldhaveamaximumof11patientspernursewhen theyareworkingwithpsychiatricpatientsandadescending ratio with patients of other profiles. It seems that a high patient-to-nurseratioforcesnursestoworkquicklybecause they do not have enough time for each patient, and this presentsachallengefornursestomaintainahighqualityof nursingcare,andtotakesafecareoftheirpatients.Previous literaturehasfoundthatsafetyincidentshavebeenespecially associatedwithnurseovertimeandpatient–nurseratios[21], anditisthereforeimportantfornursestohaveenoughstaffing andresourcestodeliveragoodqualityofnursingcare[22].

Strengths and limitations of this study have to be mentioned.Thestrengthofthisstudyisthatthesamplesize (n=1082)waslargeandtheresponserate(64%)wasgood.It also comprised several health care professional groups, including physicians, nurses, and nurse assistants. Given the lack of previous studies concerning patient safety conductedintheBalticarea,thisstudycanbeconsideredas apioneeringwork.Furthermore,thisstudyisthefirstofits kindtoinvestigatethegeneralpatientsafetyskillsofhealth careprofessionalsinLithuania.

However,alimitationexistsrelatedtotheinstrumentused inthisstudy.Theissuesconcerningpatientsafetyskillswere investigatedatgenerallevel,forthepurposeofinvestigatinga representative spectrum of health professionals such as physicians, nurses and nurse assistants. To expand this general view, further research isneeded toinvestigate the specific skill areas in different professions, and also in differentclinicalsettings.Thedatawerepurposefullycollect- edinoneregion,butitisoneofthebiggestregionsinLithuania and maybeseen asrepresentativeof thenationalcontext.

Also,thosewhodropped-out(36%)mighthaveadifferentlevel ofpatientsafetyskillsthanmajorityrespondentsofthisstudy.

Furthermore thecorrelationsfound werevery weak, sowe needtomoderatewhichkindofconclusionswemakebased ontheresults.

Regardlessofthesepoints,however,theinstrumentsused inthestudywerevalidatedandpilotedinthefeaturedresearch context,andreturnedagoodpsychometricperformance.

5. Conclusions

Thisstudyhasservedtoinvestigatethegeneralskillsofhealth careprofessionalsinregardtopatientsafety.Itprovidesnew

(7)

knowledgeaboutthetopicinBalticcountries,andcanthusbe used in the development of health care services. Overall, healthcareprofessionalsinthissettinghadgoodskillsinerror analysisandskillslinkedtotheavoidanceofthreatstopatient safety, but were less skilled in using decision support technology.Healthcareprofessionalswhoweremoreexperi- encedandwithamedicalschooleducationhadbettersafety skills, asdid those who worked on nightshifts withmore nursingpersonnel.However,itwasshownthatcomparedto the other groups in this study, nurse assistants wereless skilledregardingpatientsafety. Therefore,moresupportby managersandcolleaguesis neededtoensuretheir compe- tence. Further research is also needed to investigate the patientsafetyskillsofdifferent healthcareprofessions,and morespecifically,todeterminetheirsafetyskillsneeds.

Conflict of interest

Nonedeclared.

Authors' contribution

Study conception/design: I.B., M.K., T.S.; data collection/

analysis:I.B.,A.M.;draftingandwritingthemanuscript:I.B., M.K.,A.M.,V.M.,T.S.;approvalofthefinaltext:I.B.,M.K.,A.M., V.M.,T.S.

Funding

The study was partly funded by the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of TampereUniversityHospital:GrantNumber9S065.

Ethical approval

Ethicalapprovalwasreceivedfromtheethicalcommitteeof Klaipeda University, Faculty of Health Sciences and study permissionwasobtainedfromthehospitalswhoparticipated inthisstudy.

references

[1] AroraS,SevdalisN,AhmedM,WongH,MoorthyK,Vincent C.Safetyskillstrainingforsurgeons:ahalf-day

interventionimprovesknowledge,attitudesandawareness ofpatientsafety.Surgery2012;152(1):26–31.

[2] GordonM,DarbyshireD,BakerP.Non-technicalskills trainingtoenhancepatientsafety:asystematicreview.

MedEduc2012;46:1042–54.

[3] WhiteN.Understandingtheroleofnon-technicalskillsin patientsafety.NursStand2012;26(26):43–8.

[4] BrasaiteI,KaunonenM,SuominenT.Healthcare professionals'knowledge,attitudesandskillsregarding patientsafety:asystematicliteraturereview.ScandJ CaringSci2015;29:30–50.

[5] LeapeL,BerwickD,ClancyC,ConwayJ,GluckP,GuestJ, etal.Transforminghealthcare:asafetyimperative.Qual SafHealthCare2009;18(6):424–8.

[6] AhmedM,AroraS,BakerP,HaydenJ,VincentC,SevdalisN.

Buildingcapacityandcapabilityforpatientsafety education:atrain-the-trainersprogrammeforsenior doctors.BMJQualSaf2013;22(August(8)):618–25.

[7] AhmedM,AroraS,TiewS,HaydenJ,SevdalisN,VincentC, etal.Buildingasaferfoundation:theLessonsLearntpatient safetytrainingprogramme.BMJQualSaf2014;23:78–86.

[8] MilliganF,DennisS.Buildingasafetyculture.NursStand 2005;20(11):48–52.

[9] NdosiMwidimiE,NewellR.Nurses'knowledgeof pharmacologybehinddrugstheycommonlyadminister.J ClinNurs2009;18:570–80.

[10] HughesRG,editor.Patientsafetyandquality:anevidence- basedhandbookfornurses.AHRQPublicationNo.08-0043.

Rockville,MD:AgencyforHealthcareResearchandQuality;

2008,March[chapter35].

[11] BraithwaiteJ,WestbrookMT,MallockNA,TravagliaJF, IedemaRA.Experiencesofhealthprofessionalswho conductedrootcauseanalysesafterundergoingasafety improvementprogramme.QualSafHealthCare 2006;15:393–9.

[12] MarraAR,EdmondMB.Newtechnologiestomonitor healthcareworkerhandhygiene.ClinMicrobiolInfect 2014;20(1):29–33.

[13] ComunaleME,SandovalM,BroussardT.Anassessmentof basicpatientsafetyskillsinresidentsenteringthefirstyear ofclinicaltraining.JPatientSaf2015.http://dx.doi.org/

10.1097/PTS.0000000000000179

[14] FreemanMC,StocksME,CummingO,JeandronA,Higgins JP,WolfJ,etal.Hygieneandhealth:systematicreviewof handwashingpracticesworldwideandupdateofhealth effects.TropMedIntHealth2014;19(8):906–16.

[15] KirkmanMK,SevdalisN,AroraS,BakerP,VincentC, AhmedM.Theoutcomesofrecentpatientsafetyeducation interventionsfortraineephysiciansandmedicalstudents:

asystematicreview.BMJOpen2015;5:e007705.http://dx.

doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007705

[16] MerrillKC.Leadershipstyleandpatientsafety:implications fornursemanagers.JNursAdm2015;45(6):319–24.

[17] DeclarationofHelsinki.WMADeclarationofHelsinki– EthicalPrinciplesforMedicalResearchInvolvingHuman Subjects;2013,http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/

10policies/b3[accessed22.01.15].

[18] SchnallR,StoneP,CurrieL,DesjardinsK,JohnRM,Bakken S.Developmentofaself-reportinstrumenttomeasure patientsafetyattitudes,skills,andknowledge.JNurs Scholarsh2008;40:391–4.

[19] BurnsN,GroveSK.Thepracticeofnursingresearch:

appraisal,synthesis,andgenerationofevidence.St.Louis, MO:SaundersElsevier;2009.

[20] LietuvosRespublikossveikatosapsaugosministro įsakymasNr.V-400.DėlSlaugytojųdarbokrūvionustatymo tvarkosaprašopatvirtinimo(Žin.,2012,Nr.55-2751) [LithuanianMinisterofHealthOrderNo.V-400.Procedural approvalforestablishingnursesworkload(OfficialGazette.

2012,No.55-2751)].

[21] LiuLF,LeeS,ChiaPF,ChiSC,YinYC.Exploringthe associationbetweennurseworkloadandnurse-sensitive patientsafetyoutcomeindicators.JNursRes2012;20 (4):300–9.

[22] SmedsAleniusL,TishelmanC,RunesdotterS,LindqvistR.

StaffingandresourceadequacystronglyrelatedtoRNs' assessmentofpatientsafety:anationalstudyofRNs workinginacute-carehospitalsinSweden.BMJQualSaf 2014;23(3):242–9.

Viittaukset

LIITTYVÄT TIEDOSTOT

Patient safety incident reporting is a key process for organizational learning and development of a safety culture, and incident‐ reporting systems can be particularly effective

Qualitative study with thematic analysis. Semi- structured interviews with 35 HCPs. All participants identified that incident reporting is a main instrument to communicate

Abbreviations: PaPSC scale, Patients' Perceptions of Safety Culture scale; PC PMOS, The Primary Care Patient Measure of Safety; PC PMOS, The Primary Care Patient Measure of Safety;

Aim: The purpose of this study was to describe the experiences of learning interprofessional collaboration among students and professionals who participated in a social and health

According to the model, behavioural intention predicts actual behaviour and three factors affect behavioural intention: attitude (beliefs about the consequences and experiences

Aim: The purpose of this study was to describe the experiences of learning interprofessional collaboration among students and professionals who participated in a social and health

The Master's Degree Programs in the Finnish universities are the Master's Degree Pro- gram in Health and Human Service Informatics at the University of Eastern

In this study we assessed patient-related continuity of care in the Finnish primary health care setting by asking patients: “When you visit the health centre, do you usually see