• Ei tuloksia

4 Presentation

5.2 The relationship between CPD and demographic variables

5.2.1 The reasons for taking part in CPD

Table 14. Comparison of reasons for taking part in CPD according to the type of organization and gender

Table 14. Comparison of reasons for taking part in CPD according to the type of organization and gender

Variables Groups N Mean Std. Dev. t p

Type of organization

Private 160 3.232 0.448

3.188 0.002 Public 122 3.051 0.506

Gender Male 56 3.013 0.497

−2.453 0.015 Female 226 3.188 0.473

Table 14 shows that a statistically significant difference was observed according to the variables of school type (p = 0.002 < α = 0.05) and gender (p = 0.015 < α = 0.05) in the teachers’ replies to the question “How important are these reasons for you to take part in CPD practices?” When the difference in the type of school was analysed, the mean score of the replies from teachers employed in private schools ( = 3.232) was higher compared to those of the teachers employed in public schools ( = 3.051). When the gender difference is examined, the mean of the

replies from the female ( = 3.188) teachers was higher compared to the male teachers ( = 3.013).

Table 15. Comparison of reasons for taking part in CPD according to years of professional experience and higher education

Table 15. Comparison of reasons for taking part in CPD according to years of professional experience and higher education

Variables Groups N Mean Std. Dev F P

Years of professional experience

1–5 92 3.268 0.497

4.394 0.013

5–10 98 3.067 0.482

More than 10 92 3.130 0.448

Higher education

BA 150 3.131 0.479

0.343 0.710

MA or MS 113 3.180 0.471

PhD 19 3.165 0.581

The results in Table 15 indicate that a statistically significant difference was observed according to the variable of professional experience (p = 0.013 < α = 0.05) between the replies of the participating teachers to the question “How important are these reasons for you to take part in CPD practices?” However, there was not a statistically significant difference observed according to the instructors’ level of higher education (p = 0.710 > α = 0.05). When the difference in professional experience is examined, the results reveal that the replies of the teachers to the question “How important were these reasons for you to take part in CPD practices?” instructors with 1–5 years’ experience had the highest mean scores ( = 3.268) whereas those with 5–10 years’ experience had the lowest mean scores ( = 3.067).

5.2.2 The types of CPD

Table 16. Comparison of the types of CPD according to type of organization and genderTable 16.Comparison of the types of CPD according to type of organization and gender

Variable Groups N Mean Std. Dev. t p

Type of organization Private 160 2.469 0.541

−0.602 0.548

Public 122 2.505 0.441

Gender Male 56 2.423 0.549

−1.024 0.307

Female 226 2.500 0.487

As it can be seen from Table 16, there was no statistically significant difference observed according to the type of organization (p = 0.548 > α = 0.05) and gender (p = 0.307 > α = 0.05) between the replies to the question “Which of the following types or methods of CPD activities have you experienced recently?

Table 17. Comparison of the types of CPD undertaken according to years of professional experience and level of education

Table 17. Comparison of the types of CPD undertaken according to years of professional experience and level of education

Variable Groups N Mean Std. Dev. F p

Years of professional experience

1–5 92 2.415 0.498

1.325 0.268

5–10 98 2.523 0.529

More than 10 92 2.512 0.464

Education level

BA 150 2.462 0.502

1.682 0.188

MA or MS 113 2.481 0.472

PhD 19 2.684 0.612

Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference observed according to the variables of professional experience (p = 0.268 > α = 0.05) and level of education (p = 0.188 > α = 0.05) between the replies to the question “Which of the following types or methods of CPD activities have you experienced recently?” in Table 17.

5.2.3 Acquiring new knowledge and skills

Table 18. Comparison of the ways in which instructors acquire new knowledge and skills according to type of organization and gender

Table 18. Comparison of the ways in which instructors acquire new knowledge and skills according to type of organization and gender

Variable Groups N Mean Std. Dev. t p

Type of organization

Private 160 3.904 0.391

2.689 0.008

Public 122 3.776 0.404

Gender

Male 56 3.688 0.419

−3.416 0.001

Female 226 3.888 0.387

As a result of the analysis, a statistically significant difference was observed according to the type of organization (p = 0.008 < α = 0.05) and gender (p = 0.001

< α = 0.05) between the replies to the statement “From the following statements, please rate how you generally acquire new knowledge and skills.” When the difference in the type of organization was examined, the mean score of replies from the teachers employed in private schools ( = 3.904) was higher compared to those of the teachers employed in public schools ( = 3.776). When the gender difference was examined, the mean of replies from female teachers ( = 3.888) was higher compared to those of male teachers ( = 3.688).

Table 19. Instructors’ acquisition of new knowledge and skills according to years of professional experience and level of education

Table 19.Instructors’ acquisition of new knowledge and skills according to years of professional experience and level of education

Variable Groups N Mean Std. Dev. F p

Years of professional experience

1–5 92 3.844 0.442

0.994 0.372 5–10 98 3.811 0.403

More than 10 92 3.893 0.352

Level of education

BA 150 3.794 0.411

2.989 0.052 MA or MS 113 3.909 0.381

PhD 19 3.921 0.394

As stated in Table 19, no statistically significant difference was observed according to the variables of professional experience (p = 0.372 > α = 0.05) and the level of education between the replies to the question “From the following statements, please rate how you generally acquire new knowledge and skills.”

5.2.4 Using new knowledge and skills

Table 20. Ways in which instructors use new knowledge and skills according to type of work and gender

Table 20.Ways in which instructors use new knowledge and skills according to type of work and gender

Variable Groups N Mean Std. Dev. t p

Type of work Private 160 3.405 0.423

1.779 0.076

Public 122 3.316 0.402

Gender Male 56 3.354 0.485

−0.263 0.793

Female 226 3.370 0.398

As a result of the analysis, it was found that there was no statistically significant difference observed according to the type of school (p = 0.076 > α = 0.05) and gender (p = 0.793 > α = 0.05) between the replies to the question “From the following statements, please rate how you would use new knowledge and skills you have acquired by participating in CPD activities.”

Table 21. Ways in which instructors use new knowledge and skills according to years of professional experience and level of education

Table 21.Ways in which instructors use new knowledge and skills according to years of professional experience and level of education

Variable Groups N Mean Std. Dev. F p

Years of professional experience

1–5 92 3.396 0.393

0.442 0.643

5–10 98 3.339 0.479

More than 10 92 3.367 0.365

Level of education

BA 150 3.383 0.433

0.703 0.496

MA or MS 113 3.363 0.401

PhD 19 3.263 0.371

As a result of the analysis, no statistically significant difference was observed according to the variables of professional experience (p = 0.643 > α = 0.05) and education level (p = 0.496 > α = 0.05) between the replies to the item “using new knowledge and skills according to years of professional experience and education level CPD activities.”

5.2.5 The effectiveness of CPD

Table 22. Comparison of the effectiveness of CPD according to type of organization and gender Table 22. Comparison of the effectiveness of CPD according to type of organization and gender

Variables Groups N Mean Std. Dev. t p

Type of organization

Private 160 2.226 0.443

1.696 0.074

Public 122 2.139 0.401

Gender Male 56 2.076 0.435

−2.222 0.027

Female 226 2.217 0.422

It can be seen in Table 22 that there were no statistically significant differences according to the type of organization (p = 0.074 > α = 0.05) between the replies to the question “Please rate the outcomes gained as a result of your participating

in CPD activities,” but there is a statistically significant difference according to the gender variable (p = 0.027 < α = 0.05).

For gender difference, the mean of replies given by the female teachers ( = 2.217) to the question is higher compared to those of the male teachers ( = 2.076).

Table 23. Comparison of the effectiveness of CPD according to years of professional experience and level of education

Table 23.Comparison of the effectiveness of CPD according to years of professional experience and level of education

Variables Groups N Mean Std. Dev. f p

Years of professional experience

1–5 92 2.206 0.449

0.353 0.703

5–10 98 2.201 0.443

More than 10 92 2.158 0.388

Level of education

BA 150 2.152 0.405

2.622 0.074

MA or MS 113 2.204 0.447

PhD 19 2.383 0.439

It can be seen in Table 23 that no statistically significant difference was observed according to the variables of professional experience (p = 0.703 > α = 0.05) and level of education (p = 0.074 > α = 0.05) between the replies to the question “Please rate the outcomes gained as a result of your participating in CPD activities.”

5.3 Analysis of the qualitative data -I