• Ei tuloksia

6 TURBINE MODEL

6.4 PaT operation area

As described earlier, the maximum flow rate (resistance) curve can be described with (eq. 6.21) and the minimum flow rate curve (runaway) with (eq. 6.20). These are the economical operation limits for a PaT. The PaT can be operated outside this area, but no power generation is possible there, and electricity has to be used to keep the PaT operating in that area. The different operation areas are described in detail in chapter 3.

Fig. 6.1 illustrates the runaway and resistance flow rates of Sulzer AHLSTAR A22-80 as a turbine when the system curve is known. The operation area of PaT is limited between these two flow rates in this system.

Fig. 6.1. Sulzer A22-80 and a system curve of π»π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘ = 15 m and π‘˜π‘ π‘¦π‘ π‘‘π‘’π‘š = 0.015. The maximum and mini-mum flow rates are marked with vertical lines.

Fig. 6.2 illustrates the maximum and minimum head of a PaT with the same system as earlier de-scribed. Maximum pressure reduction (highest turbine head) can be achieved at runaway speed, and the minimum pressure reduction at resistance curve (zero speed).

Fig. 6.2. Sulzer A22-80 and a system curve of π»π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘ = 15 m and π‘˜π‘ π‘¦π‘ π‘‘π‘’π‘š = 0.015. The maximum and mini-mum turbine head are marked with horizontal lines.

In order to simplify the use of a PaT as a control valve in simple closed loop applications, an equiv-alent for valve opening is created. A typical valve opening is given as a percentage from 0 to 100 %, which is transformed to a current signal which is given to a valve positioner. Typical signal for valve positioner is a current signal from 4 mA to 20 mA. On the contrary, the control signal for the PaT motor speed is typically a digital signal which contains a reference speed for the frequency converter.

Valve opening percentage can be changed to turbine speed reference with (eq. 6.24) when the runa-way speed is known

𝑛 = π‘›π‘Ÿπ‘Ž(1 βˆ’ π‘₯

100) (6.24)

This simplifies the use of a PaT as a control valve for example in closed loop control applications, because it introduces the operating limits of a PaT. It is worth mentioning that according to (eq.

6.24), the 0 % opening is the runaway speed of the PaT and the 100 % is zero-speed. The maximum flow rate is achieved at 100 % opening, which corresponds to zero-speed.

As described earlier, the runaway speed of a PaT depends on the flow rate at runaway, which is, dependent on the turbine head. When the turbine characteristics are known, depending on the system and the measurements available there is two ways to calculate the runaway speed:

A) Calculation of the turbine head at runaway based on the known system properties.

B) Estimation of turbine head using measurements or estimate from frequency converter With method A, the turbine head at runaway can be calculated when the system properties are known.

For example, if the system has a static head and the friction losses in the pipelines are known, the runaway head can be calculated. The turbine head is equal to the system head, which is the system static head subtracted with the head loss in the system pipelines at the runaway flow rate.

The pressure loss in a pipeline is described by (eq. 5.01) and this can be further modified to include the system pipe friction coefficients and pipe geometries into one constant. The result is (eq. 6.25).

Δ𝑝 = πœŒπ‘”π» =1

2πœŒπ‘£2π‘˜π‘™π‘œπ‘ π‘ π‘’π‘  (6.25)

Where the constant π‘˜π‘™π‘œπ‘ π‘ π‘’π‘  includes all the friction pressure losses and minor losses in the pipeline.

The acceleration due to gravity, pipe cross sectional area and the friction coefficient can be absorbed

in one coefficient so the equation can be rewritten to form that is easy to fit to measurement data.

(Eq. 6.26) also illustrates the system head losses dependency of the square of flow rate.

Δ𝐻 = π‘˜π‘ π‘¦π‘ π‘‘π‘’π‘šβˆ™ 𝑄2 (6.26)

Where π‘˜π‘ π‘¦π‘ π‘‘π‘’π‘š is a system specific constant which describes the pressure losses in the system pipe-line when the pipepipe-line remains unchanged. The system is assumed to have a static head and the head losses in system are described with (eq. 6.26). If the whole system head is consumed by the PaT, the turbine head can be solved with (eq. 6.27).

𝐻𝑑= π»π‘ π‘¦π‘ π‘‘π‘’π‘š = π»π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘βˆ’ π‘˜π‘ π‘¦π‘ π‘‘π‘’π‘šβˆ™ 𝑄2 (6.27)

Turbine head can be inserted into the model for runaway head (eq. 6.20) and solved for flow rate at runaway. The runaway speed π‘›π‘Ÿπ‘Ž can be directly solved from (eq. 6.19). Fig. 6.3 illustrates the run-away speed determination with method A.

Fig. 6.3. Method A for determining runaway speed.

With method B, the turbine head at runaway is assumed to be the same as the measured or estimated head value. This value is used to calculate the runaway speed. Fig. 6.4 illustrates the method for estimating the runaway speed.

Fig. 6.4. Method B for determining the runaway speed.

The method B makes it possible to use PaT as a control valve without any knowledge about the system head or friction coefficients of the system piping. This is advantageous in many ways, for example, the system characteristics are not always known in the process where valve is installed.

The system characteristics do not necessarily stay constant, but they may vary, and this will cause the turbine runaway speed to change.

This method assumes the turbine head to stay constant while the flow rate changes. There is an error because the turbine head will rise in a typical system, when the turbine speed is increased towards the runaway condition. This is because of the decreasing flow rate and therefore decreasing pressure losses in the pipeline. This does not necessarily cause a major error in the runaway speed calculation, because this iteration can be done constantly for as the head value changes.

Method B makes it easier to use the PaT in applications where a simple, closed loop control is wanted. It also makes it possible to use a PaT when the system properties are not known, or they are changing. A control valve does not need to know the pressure difference, so in control valve replace-ment applications this might be simplest solution. If a pressure measurereplace-ment is not available, an estimate from the frequency converter could also be used. Sensorless estimation is described later.