• Ei tuloksia

Case study 8: an award-winning milk processing business

9 Rural SMEs in food chains in Finland: examples of best practices

9.7 Co-operation network

9.7.2 Case study 8: an award-winning milk processing business

Business and entrepreneur characteristics

Case study 8 is a family-owned micro-business located in the small municipality of Pyhäjärvi in the Nivala-Haapajärvi sub-region, which is in the southern part of Northern Ostrobothnia. The sub-region has 33,000 inhabitants, of whom 6,000 live in Pyhäjärvi.

The sub-region is currently receiving development assistance as part of the European Objective 1 programme, and experiences high unemployment and out-migration. Strong development efforts have been made in mechanical wood processing and the metal industry. Since the mid-1990s, large investments have also been directed towards the development of small-scale food processing.

Before starting the business in 1997 the owner worked for a local dairy, and his own food processing business began gradually. The business started with a few products and gradually developed others, even though the total is still less than ten. The current product range is concentrated in two categories: unripened cheese (70% of production volume) and mushrooms (30%). Both include high quality niche products, some of which have won national awards. In 2002, one of the business’s cheeses won fi rst prize in the category of small cheese processors, in a competition organised by the Finnish Small Cheese Dairy Association.The business employs family members and three hired staff, of whom one is full-time and two are seasonal, mainly during the Easter and Christmas periods. The turnover of the business is approximately 0.4 million euros, which could be doubled by expanding operations. During high seasons, the business is not able to satisfy the demand for certain products with its present capacity. The business has access to good, spacious production facilities that used to belong to a local dairy, and therefore future expansion will not require large capital investment.

The owner has taken various short courses and the business has been involved in regional and local development projects, which had to do with marketing, logistics and other as-pects of business operation. The business has, therefore, clearly undertaken a signifi cant investment in human capital. Approximately 80% of production is marketed by another business, which is a medium-sized processing business. To access certain market areas, the case study business has contracts with other marketing businesses. The business itself takes care of the local marketing of its products.

In the early stages of operations, the business undertook small-scale market research. For example, before marketing its mushroom salad, two blindfold consumer-testing panels were organised in different parts of Finland. Both consumer panels selected the case study business product as the best and most authentic.

The business supply chain

The upstream and downstream linkages for case study 8 are shown in Figure 9.15. The business fully recognises the importance of both upstream and downstream nodes in the supply chain. Relationships have to be taken care of, and long-term and established business relationships are valued. The business mainly utilises long chains due to its use of marketing fi rms.

Upstream

The main raw material of the business is milk, which is sourced locally from a national supplier. The milk lots are delivered to the business up to four times a week, depending on seasonal fl uctuations in production. Another important raw material is eggs or egg mass.

Approximately 60% of the egg mass is sourced locally and 40% comes from Southwest Finland. The selection of a main supplier for raw material has been simple, as there are limited possibilities for milk supplies. In the case of egg mass, fl exibility of service and price has infl uenced supplier selection, as well as the supplier’s location near the

busi-ness. The business is able to use a label of Finnish origin, the swan fl ag, on its products.

The label is used because the business thinks that “…it’s a good label. It’s most likely to promote sales” (Interview, January 25th 2002).

The quality requirements for the raw material are extremely strict. The business has not experienced any problems with liquid milk or milk powder, but some problems have existed with egg mass. The business tightened the quality requirements for egg mass suppliers, and since then the quality has been good. The origin of raw materials can be traced all the way back to farms, but it is not regarded as an important quality feature as it is not requested by consumers. It is usually enough for the consumers to know that the cheese is Finnish.

Downstream

Most of the fi nished products, approximately 80%, are marketed by a medium-sized processing business. Co-operation between the processor and the case study business started with the initiation of the processing business in the late 1990s. At the beginning there were no written contracts, although the businesses were committed to building a long-term relationship; currently the business relationship is more formal. In order to access certain market areas in southern Finland the business has contracts with other marketing businesses. The business takes care of the local marketing of its products, and uses its own transportation when delivering to the local markets. Although it uses other businesses to market and distribute its products, these products are still sold under the brand name, with the name of the marketer visible on some product labels. External partners mainly undertake transportation of fi nished products, on the national level, along with a specialised carrier. In addition, one of the raw material suppliers distributes the fi nished products at a regional level.

The business sometimes gets new ideas or hints for new product development from its downstream partners. However, the owner would appreciate more active feedback from customers and the marketing businesses it uses. Both positive and negative feedback are expected in order to further improve the products.

The future target concerning customer segments is clear to the owner: the food service sector interests the business as an untested segment. It is thought that profi t margins could be higher in the food service sector, compared to the retail sector, and that co-op-eration with downstream customers would be more open, for example in new product development.

The role of ICT

The adoption of ICT is on a relatively low level. The business uses on a daily basis, the telephone, mobile phone and fax machine. Personal computer, email, the internet and professional software are used less often, maybe once or twice a week. The business does not have a website, as it does not market the products itself. According to the owner, the

use of ICT means savings in time and money for the business. As well, there is the matter of creating an image for the products and the business, which whould probably necessitate the business having its own website. ICT is generally used for normal communication, marketing and sales, ordering and invoicing, and as a tool for decision-making and quality control. The owner acknowledges that ICT will be more important in the future, if the turnover of the business increases as planned.

The role of institutions

The business has received external assistance for new product development from various institutions. For example, the business has received both advice and fi nancial aid for prod-uct development from the National Technology Agency. The business has also received grants for capital investment from the regional Employment and Economic Development Centre. It has a contract with MTT Agrifood Research, in a relationship connected to

Input Suppliers

Figure 9.15 Supply chain diagram for case study

business 8.

new product development proc-esses. The owner considers that the regional and local organisa-tions are providing sufficient support for small food business owners, for example in personal development or ICT, although its relevance is not always instantly obvious. According to the owner, it is not diffi cult to fi nd external assistance.

Rural development

The rural location of the busi-ness is considered to have both advantages and disadvantages for operations. The owner thinks that for a micro-business in the food processing industry, the main advantages include lower production costs compared to urban areas, lower labour costs and production facilities that are highly appreciated by the owner. On the other hand, the main disadvantage of a periph-eral location is the long physical distance from major markets. As the business’s products are per-ishable, logistics is a key issue.

The owners have considered relocating the production plant nearer to the main markets in southern Finland, but as the name of the business is attached to the region, they would probably have to change that also and redesign the packaging; such adaptation would be costly. However, the owner is certain that the peripheral location of the business has not prevented any marketing transactions, although it may have caused some diffi culties.

Strengths Weaknesses

• Reliable supply of raw materials

• Investments in human capital

• Investments in the development of business operations

• New product development in co-operation with other businesses

• Innovative, quality niche products, with clear Finnish identity

• Long-term marketing strategy

• Well-functioning co-operation with a marketing business

• Exploitation of external assistance

• Links to the region

• Weak connection with the fi nal customer/consumer

• Website not developed

• Location means high transportation costs

• Production of some items is not always able to satisfy demand

Opportunities Threats

• Food service sector targeted as a new market segment

• Enhanced consumer-orientation

• Wider product range to build business image

• Production facilities offer possibilities to extend operations

• Website to help create market image

• Exploitation of awards won

• Successor not identifi ed for the business

Figure 9.16 SWOT Analysis – Case study business 8.

References

Alasuutari, P. (1999) Laadullinen tutkimus. 3rd Edition. Osuuskunta Vastapaino. Tam-pere.

Barber, B. (1995) All economies are “embedded”: the end of a concept and beyond. Social Research, 62 (2), pp. 387–413.

Beamon, B. M. (1996) Performance measures in supply chain management. Proceed-ings of the 1996 Conference on Agile and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: Troy, New York, October.

Bewley, T. (2002) Interviews as a Valid Empirical Tool in Economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics 31, pp. 343–353.

BusinessLINK. (2001) http://www.turku.chamber.fi /businesslink/index.html

Buttel, F. H. (2001) Some refl ections on the late 20th century agrarian political economy.

Sociologia Ruralis, 41 (2), pp. 165–180.

CEC [Commission of the European Communities] (1996) First Report on Economic and Social Cohesion, CEC Luxembourg.

Cheung, S. N. S. (1987) Economic Organisation and Transaction Costs, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 2, London, MacMillan.

Cook, I. and Crang, P. (1996) The world on a plate: culinary culture, displacement and geographical knowledge. Journal of Material Culture, 1, pp. 131–153.

Cornford, J., Gillespie, A. and Richardson, R. (1996) Regional development in the in-formation society: a review and analysis. paper prepared for the European High Level Expert Group on the Social and Societal Aspects of the Information Society, CURDS, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.

Elintarvikealan pienyrittäjyyden kehittämisohjelma. (1995). Maaseutupolitiikan yht-eistyöryhmän julkaisu 3/1995.

Elintarviketeollisuuden näkymät parantuneet. Press release 18.4.2001. http://etl.fi /tiedot-teet/18-4-2001.htm. 23.4.2001.

EU-ohjelmatyö. [EU programmes 2000–2006.] http://www.intermin.fi /alue/eu/index.

html. 12.7.2001.

Fearne, A. (1998) The Evolution of Partnerships in the Meat Supply Chain: Insights from the British Beef Industry. Supply Chain Management, 3 (4), pp. 214–231.

Feret, B. & M. Marcinek. (1999) The future of the academic library and the academic librarian: a Delphi study. Library Career Development, 7 (10), pp. 91–107

Finlandia. (1984) Otavan iso maammekirja 2. Varsinais-Suomi, Satakunta, Ahvenanmaa.

Keuruu.

Finlandia. (1986) Otavan iso maammekirja 2. Pohjois-Pohjanmaa ja Kainuu. Keuruu.

Fine, B. (1994) Towards a political economy of food, Review of International Political Economy, 1, pp. 519–545.

Friedland, W., Busch, L., Buttel, F. and Rudy, A. (eds.) (1991) Towards a New Political Economy of Agriculture. Westview Press, USA.

Gilmore, A., Carson, D. And K. Grant. (2001) SME marketing and practice. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 19, 1, pp. 6–11.

Goodman, D. (1999) Agro-food studies in the ‘age of ecology’: nature, corporeality, bio-politics. Sociologia Ruralis, 39 (1), pp. 17–38.

Goodman, D. And M. Watts. (1997) Globalising food: agrarian questions and global restructuring. Routledge, New York.

Grimes, S. (2000) Rural areas in the information society: diminishing distance or increas-ing learnincreas-ing capacity? Journal of Rural Studies, 16, pp. 13–21.

Harland, C., M., Lamming R., C. & P. D. Cousins. (1999) Developing the concept of supply strategy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19 (7), pp. 650–673.

Hartwick, E. (2000) Towards a geographical politics of consumption, Environment and Planning A, 32, pp. 1177–1192.

Heinonen, J. (2000) Mistä uusia yrittäjiä maaseudulle? Puheenvuoro maaseutuyrit-täjyydestä. Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Business Research and Development Centre. Research report B 12/2000.

The Helsinki Research Institute for Business Administration. (1994) Haja-asutusalueiden palvelutarjonnan turvaaminen. Helsinki.

Hinrichs, C. C. (1998) Sideline and Lifetime: the cultural economy of maple syrup pro-duction. Rural Sociology, 63 (4), pp507–532.

Hinrichs, C. C. (2000) Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 3, pp. 295–303.

Hobbs, J. E. and Young, L. (2000) Closer vertical co-ordination in agri-food supply chains:

a conceptual framework and some preliminary evidence, Supply Chain Management, 5 (3), pp. 131–142.

Home, N. (1999) Kyläkauppaan vai markettiin – maaseutuasiakkaat ostopaikkaa val-itsemassa. (Rural Consumer’s Patronage Behaviour), Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja B-21, Helsinki.

Hughes, A. (2000) Retailers, knowledges and changing commodity networks: the case of the cut fl ower trade. Geoforum, 31, pp. 175–190.

Hughes, D. (1995) The impact of information technology on vertical linkages in the agriculture and food industry. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 43, pp.

615–623.

Ihmisten maaseutu – Tahdon maaseutupolitiikka. (2000) [Countryside for the people – rural policy based on will.] Maaseutupoliittinen kokonaisohjelma vuosille 2001–2004.

Maaseutupolitiikan yhteistyöryhmä.

Ilbery, B. and Kneafsey, M. (1998) Product and place: promoting quality products and services in the lagging rural regions of the European Union. European Urban and Re-gional Studies, 5, pp. 329–341.

Jensen, R. (1999) The Dream Society. How the coming shift from information to imagi-nation will transform businesses. Mc Graw-Hill. New York.

Kallio, P., Isosaari, H., Kola, J. & Marttila, J. (2000) Elintarvikeketjun ohjaaminen ja tehokkuus – taloudellisen ketjuanalyysin menetelmät ja mahdollisuudet. [Management and Effi ciency of the Food Chain: Methods and Possibilities of an Economic Chain Analysis.]

In: Marttila, J. & Ahlsteadt, J. (Eds.) Maataloustieteen päivät 2000. Talous ja teknologia.

Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Finland. Publications 94, pp. 79–94.

Kallio, P., Marttila, J. & Mäkimattila, M. (2001) Euroopan unionin laajenemisen vaikutuk-set elintarviketalouteen. [The Effects of European Union Enlargement on Food Economy.]

Pellervo Economic Research Institute. Working Papers 40. Helsinki.

Kaupan tomintaedellytyksiin vaikuttavien tekijöiden kehitys ja kehitysnäkymät. (1995) [The Development and Prospects of Factors Effecting the Operations of Retail and Whole-sale Trade and Trade of Motor Vehicles.] The Helsinki Research Institute for Business Administration. Sarja B 115. Helsinki.

Kaynak, E., Bloom, J. and M. Leibold. (1994) Using the Delphi technique to predict future tourism potential. Marketing Intelligence and Planning. 12 (7), pp. 18–29.

Kneafsey, M., Ilbery, B. and T. Jenkins. (2001) Exploring the dimensions of culture economies in rural West Wales. Sociologia Ruralis, 41, pp. 296–310.

Laurila, K. (Ed.) (1998) Uusi tieto- ja viestintätekniikka –Näkökulmia yritys- ja palvelu-toiminnan sijoittumiseen. In: Pärjääkö Suomi? –Näkökohtia menestymisen edellytyksistä.

Pellervo Economic Research Institute. PTT katsaus 4/1998.

Le Heron, R. and Roche, M. (1999) Rapid reregulation, agricultural restructuring, and the reimaging of agriculture in New Zealand. Rural Sociology, 64 (2), pp. 203–218.

Lehtipuu, M. (1996) Finland. A Lonely Planet travel survival kit. Lonely Planet Publica-tions. Singapore.

Leslie, D. and Reimer, S. (1999) Spatializing commodity chains. Progress in Human Geography, 23 (3), pp. 401–420.

Lidl antaa hinta–laatusuhteen puhua puolestaan. (2001) Kehittyvä kauppa. K-ryhmän ammattilehti. 4/2001.

Linkola, P. (1998) Muutoksen mahdollisuus verkostossa: kertarysäys ja sitkeä jun-naaminen. In: Niinimäki, K. (Ed.) Networking in Business – Interaction in Working Life.

Seminaarijulkaisu. Työministeriö. Helsinki. pp. 116–124.

Linstone, H. A. and M. Turoff (1975) The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications.

Addision-Wesley, Reading, MA.

Lockie, S. and Kitto, S. (2000) Beyond the farm gate: production-consumption networks and agri-food research. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (1), pp. 3–19.

Lowe, M. and N. Wrigley. (1996) Towards the new retail geography. In Wrigley, N. and M. Lowe (eds.) Retailing, Consumption and Capital. Longman. London, pp. 3–30.

Lääperi, R. & Tohmo, T. (2000) Selvitys elintarviketeollisuuden EU-siirtymäkauden ja kansainvälistymistuen käytöstä ja vaikuttavuudesta. Jyväskylän yliopisto Taloustieteiden tiedekunta / Tutkimuskeskus. Julkaisuja 149/2000. Jyväskylä.

Maakunnan tila. (2001) Varsinais-Suomen liitto. Turku.

Marjanen, H. (2000) Retailing in rural Finland and the challenge of nearby cities. In-ternational Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. Volume 28, Number 4/5, pp.

194–206.

Markula, J. (1999) Suurkeittiöiden elintarvikeostot maaseutuyrityksiltä. [Purchasing of foods by commercial and non-commercial restaurants from small rural fi rms.] Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Finland. Working papers 1/99.

Marsden, T. (1999) Rural Futures: the consumption countryside and its regulation. So-ciologia Ruralis, 39 (4), pp. 501–520.

Marsden, T., Banks, J. and Bristow, G. (2000b) Food Supply Chain Approaches: Exploring their Role in Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (4), pp. 424–438.

Mauri, C. (2003). Card loyalty. A new emerging issue in grocery retailing. Journal of Retailing and consumer Services 10 (2003), pp.13–15.

Miles, I. and G. Thomas. (1999) The development of new telematics services. OECD STI Review, 6th July, pp. 35–63.

Milton, J. S., McTeer, P. M. & J. J. Corbet. (1997) Introduction to Statistics. The Mc-Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Mitchell, S. and Clark, D. (1999) Business adoption of information and communications technologies in the two-tier rural economy: some evidence from the South Midlands.

Journal of Rural Studies, 15, pp. 447–455.

Morris, C. and N. Evans. (2004) Agricultural turns, geographical turns: retrospect and prospect. Journal of Rural Studies. 20, pp. 95–111.

Murdoch, J. (2000) Networks – a new paradigm of rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 16 (4), pp. 407–419.

Murdoch, J., Marsden, T. and Banks, J. (2000) Quality, nature and embeddedness: some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography, 76 (2), pp.107–125.

Mäkitie, J. (1995) Elintarvikeyritysten alihankinta ja yhteistyö. Pyhäjärvi-instituutin julkaisuja 16. Eura.

Nygård, B. and Storstad, O. (1998) De-gloabalisation of food markets? Consumer percep-tions of safe food: the case of Norway. Sociologia Ruralis, 38 (1), pp. 35–53.

Oilinki-Nenonen, P. (2000) Pohjois-Pohjanmaan elintarviketeollisuuden ennakointi. Enna-kointiprojektin tulokset. Pohjois-Pohjanmaan TE-Keskus. Pohjois-Pohjanmaan liitto.

Omta, S. (2002) Innovation in chains and networks. Journal of Chain and Network Sci-ence. 2, 2, pp. 73–80.

Oulun kaupunki. (2001) www.ouka.fi .

Patton, M., Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd Edition. Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks.

Peterson, H. C. and Wysocki, A. (1998) Strategic Choice along the Vertical Co-ordina-tion Continuum, Staff Paper #98–16, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University.

Pohjalainen, L. (1996) Elintarvikealan pk-yritysten toimintaympäristö. Elintarviketieto – Food and Farm Facts. Reports and Discussion papers 42. Espoo.

Pohjanmaa, alueen, kulttuurin ja identiteetin muodostuminen. (1999) Pohjois-Pohjanmaan liitto. Julkaisu A:22. Oulu.

Pohjois-Pohjanmaan tilastokatsaus. (2001) Pohjois-Pohjanmaan liitto. Oulu.

Porter, M. E. (1980) Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.

Päivittäistavarakauppa 2002. (2002) Brochure.

Rantala, O. (ed.) (2001) Alueelliset talousnäkymät 2001–2005. Elinkeinoelämän tutkimus-laitos (ETLA), Palkansaajien tutkimustutkimus-laitos (PT), Pellervon taloudellinen tutkimustutkimus-laitos (PTT). Taloustieto Oy. Helsinki.

Ray, C. (1998) Culture, intellectual property and territorial rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 15 (3), pp. 257–267.

Regional Rural Development Programme for Areas outside Objective 1 for 2000–2006.

(2002) Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Publications 11b/2001. Helsinki.

Renting, H., Mardsen, T. and J. Banks. (2003) Understanding alternative food networks:

exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A. 35, pp. 393–411.

Rowe, G., Wright, G. & F. Bolger. (1991) A reevaluation of research and theory. Tech-nological Forecasting and Social Change, 39, pp. 235–251.

Ruoka-Suomi työryhmä kartoitti elintarvikeyritykset. (2001) Ruoka-Suomi 3/2001.

Rural areas and rural policy. http://www.mmm.fi /. 27.4.2001.

Sage, C. (2003) Social embeddedness and relations of regard: Alternative ‘good food’

networks in south-west Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies. 19, 1, pp. 47–60.

Santasalo, T. & Kontio, K. (1997) Tukkukaupan perustietoja 1997. Liikealan ammat-tiliitto ry. Helsinki.

Shon, T-H. & P. M. C. Swatman. (1998) Identifying effectiveness criteria for Internet payment systems. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, Vol. 8 (3), pp. 202–218

Silén, T. (2001) Elintarvikeklusterin laatuselvitys. Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö. MMM:

n julkaisuja 1/2001. Helsinki.

Suomen maatalous ja maaseutuelinkeinot. (2001) [Finnish Agriculture and Rural Indus-tries.] Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Finland. Publications 97.

Suomen tilastollinen vuosikirja. (2000) Tilastokeskus. Otavan kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu.

Tapionlinna (2000) Elintarvikealan pk-yritysten toimintaympäristö 2000. Elintarviketieto Oy – Food and Farm Facts. Espoo.

Tike. (2001) Information Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Finland.

http://tike.mmm.fi /Default.htm

Tilastokeskus (2001) http://www.tilastokeskus.fi /. 22.8.2001.

Traill, W. B. and Pitts, E. (1998) Competitiveness of the Food Industry. Blackie Academic and Professional, London.

Työttömien määrä vähenee hitaammin. (2001) Helsingin Sanomat 22.8.2001.

Uusitalo, E. (1998) Elinvoimaa maaseudulle – Miksi, kenelle ja miten?

Uusitalo, E. (1998) Elinvoimaa maaseudulle – Miksi, kenelle ja miten?