Adenoviral gene transfer of Gremlin modulates VEGF-A induced angiogenesis in porcine myocardium

(1)

Rinnakkaistallenteet Terveystieteiden tiedekunta

2020

Adenoviral gene transfer of Gremlin modulates VEGF-A induced

angiogenesis in porcine myocardium

Pajula, JJ

Mary Ann Liebert Inc

Tieteelliset aikakauslehtiartikkelit

http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hum.2019.229

https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/8104

Downloaded from University of Eastern Finland's eRepository

(2)

1

Human Gene Therapy Adenoviral gene transfer of Gremlin modulates VEGF‐A induced angiogenesis in porcine myocardium (DOI: 10.1089/hum.2019.229) This paper has been peer‐reviewed and accepted for publication, but has yet to undergo copyediting and proof correction. The final published version may differ from this proof.

Adenoviral gene transfer of Gremlin modulates VEGF‐A induced angiogenesis in porcine myocardium

Juho J Pajula¹ MD, Paavo J Halonen¹ MD, Olli‐Pekka Hätinen¹ MSc, Seppo Ylä‐Herttuala^1,2* MD, PhD, FESC, Jussi Nurro¹* MD, PhD.

1University of Eastern Finland, A.I. Virtanen Institute, ² Heart center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio University Hospital

* Authors with equal contribution

Short title: AdGremlin modulates VEGF‐A induced angiogenesis Corresponding author

Seppo Ylä‐Herttuala, MD, PhD, FESC Neulaniementie 2, 70210, Kuopio, Finland

Fax. : +35817163751, Tel. : +358403532075, Email: seppo.ylaherttuala@uef.fi Subject terms:

Gene therapy Angiogenesis

Chronic ischemic heart disease

Downloaded by POHJOIS-SAVON SHP:N KUNTAYHTYMA from www.liebertpub.com at 01/02/20. For personal use only.

(3)

2

Abstract Objective

Coronary artery disease is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. New therapies are needed for patients who do not benefit or are not suitable for current treatments.

Angiogenic gene therapy using vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) has shown potential in preclinical trials. However, undesired side‐effects, such as increased permeability, limit their therapeutic potential. The aim of this study was to investigate if adenoviral gene transfer of a VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR‐2) ligand Gremlin, given simultaneously with VEGF‐A, could modulate VEGFR‐2 mediated increase in permeability without impairing the angiogenic effect of VEGF‐A gene therapy.

Methods

Gene transfers were done in pigs (n=22) using endocardial injections with an endovascular injection catheter. Animals were divided in three groups receiving adenoviral (Ad) VEGF‐A (n=10), Gremlin (n=6) or VEGF‐A + Gremlin (n=6) gene therapy. Animals were sacrificed and samples collected six days later for histological, safety and permeability analyses.

Results

The mean capillary area was significantly increased in both treatment groups with AdVEGF‐A when compared to the AdGremlin group. Also, the capillary area was significantly larger in AdVEGF‐A group without AdGremlin. No significant differences in tissue permeability were observed using modified Miles assay between AdVEGF‐A and AdVEGF‐A + AdGremlin groups. However, cardiac tamponade and sudden cardiac deaths were observed only in the AdVEGF‐A group.

Conclusion

AdVEGF‐A induces strong angiogenesis in porcine myocardium. Our results suggest that AdGremlin can limit the side effects of AdVEGF‐A therapy, even though no direct effect on tissue permeability could be demonstrated. This could enable the use of larger AdVEGF‐A doses to increase the treatment area and angiogenic effects without adverse side effects.

(4)

3

Introduction

Ischemic heart disease is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in the western world¹. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a chronic condition causing hypoxia and insufficient nutrition in the heart. It typically manifests as a condition where patients experience chest pain, shortness of breath and fatigue during physical activity².

Treatments for CAD have developed rapidly during the recent years. CAD treatments include lifestyle changes, pharmacological therapy and revascularization. Lifestyle changes mainly control CAD risk factors, whereas pharmacological therapy aims to reduce symptoms, limit the disease progression, prevent the development of ischemic heart failure and prevent acute cardiovascular events³. Revascularization procedures consist of surgical bypass grafting and endovascular operations. Coronary bypass is a major operation and as such not suitable for all patients with severe comorbidities. Endovascular operations are not suitable for patients with diffuse CAD, as no clear culprit lesion can be identified.

Thus, there remains many patients who are not suitable for current therapies or do not sufficiently benefit from them and thus, their quality of life is severely impaired. Novel therapies for these patients are urgently needed as the number of CAD patients is steadily increasing. Therapeutic angiogenesis using adenoviral gene therapy with vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) has shown promising results in preclinical trials^4–8 and has been demonstrated to be safe in clinical trials^9,10. However, clinical trials have so far been disappointing^4,11 and further studies are clearly warranted. The mechanism of action for therapeutic angiogenesis is the stimulation of blood vessel enlargement and growth in the ischemic heart to increase myocardial perfusion, and as a result to improve tissue function and regeneration¹¹. Angiogenesis is described as capillary vessel sprouting, enlargement and bridging¹². VEGF‐A was the first member of the VEGF family and it plays a key role in angiogenesis and vascular permeability. VEGF signals are mediated via three VEGF receptors (VEGFRs). VEGF‐A mainly binds to VEGFR‐1 and VEGFR‐2. VEGFR‐2 activation has been linked to angiogenesis and changes in vascular permeability^4,12, whereas VEGFR‐1 signaling is linked to inflammatory responses¹³. The most significant

(5)

4

undesired side effect of VEGF‐A gene transfer is the increased vascular permeability and tissue edema, which can cause fluid accumulation in target tissues¹⁴. In heart, this could cause cardiac tamponade if significant volumes of fluid accumulate into the pericardial sac, causing the compression of the heart and an emergency situation¹⁵.

Gremlin is a proangiogenic protein with a dual role as a Bone morphogenic protein (BMP) antagonist and a VEGFR‐2 agonist¹⁶. In this study, we aimed to determine if AdGremlin gene transfer could be used to modify the VEGFR‐2‐mediated side effects of AdVEGF‐A gene transfer without impairing the desired proangiogenic effects of AdVEGF‐A in porcine myocardium.

Materials and methods Study overview

Domestic female farm pigs weighing 25–30kg (n=22) were used for this study. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Experiment Board in Finland¹⁷. Gene transfers were done in healthy porcine myocardium to minimize endogenous upregulation of genes that would be activated under ischemic conditions. Gene transfers were done as intramyocardial injections using an adenoviral vector (Ad)⁸ at day 0. Animals were divided into three groups: AdGremlin (n=6), and two VEGF‐A groups; AdVEGF‐A (n=10) and combination group AdGremlin + AdVEGF‐A (n=6). There were two pilot animals in all groups, which are included in the survival analysis but were excluded from other statistical analysis as viral doses were not standardized with an empty viral vector. In the rest of the animals viral doses were standardized by adding empty adenovirus containing only cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter to control the total viral loads of the first two groups to match that of the combination group. The study design is described in table 1. Six days after the gene transfer (day 6), animals were sacrificed, and samples collected for analysis.

Six‐day time point was chosen as it has been previously shown to correlate with the peak effects of adenoviral gene transfers^5,8.

(6)

5

Medication

For the sedation, atropine (0.05 mg/kg, Leiras, Helsinki, Finland) and azaperone (Stresnil, 8 mg/kg; Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Beerse, Belgium) were injected intramuscularly.

Propofol (Propofol‐Lipuro, 15 mg/kg/h; Braun Medical, Melsungen, Germany) was infused intravenously for anesthesia and Fentanyl (10 µg/kg/h; Janssen Cilag, Espoo, Finland) for analgesia. Pigs were intubated and ventilated in a respirator. Intravenous potassium chloride was used for sacrification.

Gene transfer

Gene transfers were performed as 10 intramyorcardial injections (200 µl per injection) using a percutaneous approach with Noga Myostar (Johnson&Johnson) injection catheter.

Injections were targeted in the left ventricle and performed under fluoroscopic guidance.

Adenoviral vector doses (in table 1) were diluted in sterile saline.

Imaging

Coronary angiography and left ventricular cine angiography (LV‐CINE) were performed using Innova 3100IQ (GE Healthcare, USA). An ionide‐based contrast agent (Iomeron, 350 mg/ml, Bracco) was used. LV‐CINE was performed during rest and dobutamine‐induced stress using a pigtail‐type catheter to measure LVEF using Simpson`s method. Trans‐

thoracic echocardiography was performed to detect pericardial fluid accumulation.

Vascular permeability

Modified Miles Assay was used to measure plasma protein extravasation in the myocardium⁸. Evans blue dye (30 mg/kg, Sigma) was injected intravenously 30 min prior to sample collection. The heart was photographed, and samples were collected from the gene transfer area and posterior wall of the left ventricle as a control. For the dilution of the extravasated dye, 4 ml of formamide was added to the sample. It was then incubated at 68 °C for 48 h. The absorbance was analyzed using a 630 nm wavelength plate reader.

(7)

6

Histology

Tissue samples were collected from the myocardium and for safety purposes from other vital organs (lung, liver, spleen, kidney, and ovary). Tissues were fixed with paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. For staining and immunohistochemistry, samples were cut into 7 µm thick sections. CD31‐immunostaining using ‐PECAM‐1 antibody (1:100, AF806, R&D) was used for microvascular analyzes. ‐SMA immunohistostaining (1:200, M0851, Dako) was used to analyze pericyte coverage of the vessels. Delafield`s hematoxylin staining was used to evaluate safety tissues.

Blood samples

Blood samples were collected before gene transfer and at sacrifice. Tested blood samples included liver function tests alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), kidney function test creatinine (Creat), lactate dehydrogenase (LD) for potential tissue damage, Inflammation marker C‐reactive protein (CRP) and heart muscle cell specific marker troponin I (TnI) for potential myocardial injury.

Statistical analysis

Results are shown separately for each animal in dot plots with a line indicating mean value for the group. Statistical significance is evaluated by an ordinary one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey`s post hoc test. A value of p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant (GraphPad Prism 5 for Windows).

Results

AdGremlin modifies VEGF‐A angiogenesis

Both VEGF‐A treatment groups had statistically more enlarged capillaries six days after the gene transfer. Total microvascular area was increased in both VEGF‐A groups compared to the Gremlin group. Angiogenesis was more restrained in the VEGF‐A group with Gremlin than in VEGF‐A only group. This difference was also statistically significant (p < 0.01). In the AdGremlin control group, there were no signs of angiogenesis (Figure 1). Pericyte

(8)

7

coverage around the enlarged vasculature was observed in both of the treatment groups, but not in every capillary vessel (Figure 1).

VEGF‐A gene transfer increases vascular permeability

The extravasation of contrast agent was visible in angiography in both VEGF‐A groups at day 6. Evans blue dye was also easily visualized in gene transfer areas in the VEGF‐A groups. In the modified Miles assay, permeability was increased in both VEGF‐A groups but not in the Gremlin only group. There were no statistical differences between the groups. In echocardiograms, there were no sign of pericardium fluid in the Gremlin group whereas both VEGF‐A treatment groups developed a variable amount of pericardium fluid (Figure 2). Only in the AdVEGF‐A group without Gremlin animals had sudden deaths (n=3) and health issues because of the cardiac tamponade. Also, it was the only group where pericardium punctures and pericardial aspiration were needed before day 6 to manage cardiac tamponade.

Cardiac Function was not affected

The average ejection fraction (EF) for all animals at baseline was 72.1 % (SD ± 6.2 %) and at day 6 69.6 % (SD ± 9.6 %). Stroke volume (SV) at baseline was 36.5 ml (SD ± 5.7 ml) and at day 6 33.5 ml (SD ± 7.7 ml). End diastolic volume at baseline was 50.5 ml (SD ± 4.2 ml) and at day 6 47.9 ml (SD ± 6.9 ml). End systolic volume at baseline was 14.0 ml (SD ± 2.5 ml) and at day 6 14.4 ml (SD ± 4.5 ml). There were no statistically significant differences in EF, SV, EDV or ESV changes between the groups (Figure 3).

Gene transfer had no effect on off‐target tissues or blood parameters, except creatinine In the collected safety tissues (lung, liver, spleen, kidney, and ovary) there were no inflammation or histological changes detected from hematoxylin‐eosin stainings. There were no significant changes in blood parameters, except in VEGF‐A with Gremlin group where creatinine values were increased (Figure 4).

(9)

8

Discussion

AdVEGF‐A induces significant and even aberrant angiogenesis in the myocardium with a total dose of 5x10¹¹ vp. AdGremlin alone does not cause angiogenesis, but when combined with AdVEGF‐A, it seems to modulate the angiogenic effect of VEGF‐A. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of Gremlin to modulate the effects of VEGF‐A in a large animal model. The potent angiogenic effects of VEGFs have been previously modified with factors, such as dose, delivery method, transduction duration and signaling pathway modulation. These signaling pathway modulations include Slit2 and EphrinB2/EphB4 ^18,19, and Gremlin now adds to this list of modulators of angiogenic effects. Although, further studies are needed to investigate the molecular mechanisms behind these modulation effects.

VEGF‐A is known for its angiogenic properties but it has also notable side effects. Especially the increased permeability can cause pericardial fluid accumulation. AdGremlin seems to be a potential modulator of the angiogenic effect of VEGF‐A that could be used to limit tissue edema and permeability related side‐effects of AdVEGF‐A therapy. This could enable the use of larger doses of AdVEGF‐A to increase the effective treatment area in the myocardium when using local intramyocardial injection delivery route.

In this study a six‐day time point was used to analyze the effects at the peak effect of adenoviral gene transfer, because the main target was to find out if Gremlin modulates the aberrant angiogenic effect induced by VEGF‐A gene transfer. Even though both treatment groups had a similar pericyte coverage, both treatment groups accumulated a variable amount of pericardial fluid. This suggests, that pericyte coverage six days after the gene transfer is either not yet fully developed, or not functionally capable of preventing the pericardial fluid accumulation. However, in the treatment group with only AdVEGF‐A, but not in the other groups, three animals died before the six‐day endpoint. Deaths were due to the pericardial effusion causing a cardiac tamponade. Pericardial puncture and aspiration of fluid was done as a therapeutic procedure to prevent fatalities. By combining AdGremlin with the AdVEGF‐A, no cardiac tamponade was observed, and no pericardial punctures were required. One shortcoming of the study was that due to the limited

(10)

9

number of animals, the observations suggest, but do not prove, that AdGremlin could prevent the risk of fatal tamponade.

Adenoviral gene transfer did not cause inflammation or any histological changes in off‐

target organs. In AdVEGF‐A with AdGremlin group there was a statistically significant change in kidney function parameter Creatinine, but it was still close to the reference values for pigs (88 µmol/l – 239 µmol/l)²⁰ indicating a limited clinical significance. Small changes can also occur due to the use of contrast agent in the heart imaging.

The dual role of Gremlin could explain the possible mechanisms behind the modulator effects. It inhibits Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMP) signaling by blocking BMP2 and BMP4 ligand actions, which are known to induce angiogenesis. Gremlin also binds directly to VEGFR‐2¹⁶ and can compete with VEGF‐A, reducing permeability and angiogenic effects of VEGF‐A. Thus, Gremlin has potential to modulate the effects of therapeutic angiogenesis in vivo.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge animal caretakers Heikki Karhunen, Minna Törrönen and Riikka Venäläinen for their assistance with the animal experiments. This study was supported by Finnish Academy Center of Excellence and National Virus Vector Laboratory for the production of viral vectors.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

(11)

10

References

1. Naghavi M, Abajobir AA, Abbafati C, et al. Global, regional, and national age‐sex specifc mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980‐2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017;390:1151–1210.

2. Cardiol RJ. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Russ J Cardiol 2014;111:7–79.

3. Ambrosio G, Komajda M, Mugelli A, et al. Management of stable angina: A commentary on the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016;23:1401–1412.

4. Giacca M, Zacchigna S. VEGF gene therapy: Therapeutic angiogenesis in the clinic and beyond. Gene Ther 2012;19:622–629.

5. Ylä‐Herttuala S, Baker AH. Cardiovascular Gene Therapy: Past, Present, and Future.

Mol Ther 2017;25:1095–1106.

6. Nurro J, Halonen PJ, Kuivanen A, et al. AdVEGF‐B 186 and AdVEGF‐D Δ N Δ C induce angiogenesis and increase perfusion in porcine myocardium. Heart 2016;102:1716–

1720.

7. Lähteenvuo JE, Lähteenvuo MT, Kivelä A, et al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor‐B Induces Myocardium‐Specific Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis via Vascular

Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor‐1 – and Neuropilin Receptor‐1 – Dependent Mechanisms. Circulation 2009;119:845–856.

8. Rutanen J, Rissanen TT, Markkanen JE, et al. Adenoviral Catheter‐Mediated Intramyocardial Gene Transfer Using the Mature Form of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor‐D Induces Transmural Angiogenesis in Porcine Heart. Circulation 2004;109:1029–1035.

(12)

11

9. Hedman M, Hartikainen J, Syvänne M et al. Safety and Feasibility of Catheter‐Based Local Intracoronary Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Transfer in the

Prevention of Postangioplasty and In‐Stent Restenosis and in the Treatment of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia. Circulation 2003;107:2677–2683.

10. Hartikainen J, Hassinen I, Hedman A, et al. Adenoviral intramyocardial VEGF‐D D N D C gene transfer increases myocardial perfusion reserve in refractory angina

patients : a phase I / IIa study with 1‐year follow‐up. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2547–

2555.

11. Ylä‐Herttuala S, Bridges C, Katz MG, et al. Angiogenic gene therapy in cardiovascular diseases: Dream or vision? Eur Heart J 2017;38:1365–1371.

12. Ylä‐Herttuala S, Rissanen TT, Vajanto I, et al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors.

Biology and Current Status of Clinical Applications in Cardiovascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1015–1026.

13. He J, Wang H, Liu Y, et al. Blockade of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1 Prevents Inflammation and Vascular Leakage in Diabetic Retinopathy. J

Ophthalmol;2015.

14. Poliakova L. Vascular Permeability Effect of Adenovirus‐Mediated Vascular Endothelial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:339–347.

15. Spodick DH. Acute cardiac tamponade. N Engl J Med 2003;349:684–690.

16. Mitola S, Ravelli C, Moroni E, et al. Gremlin is a novel agonist of the major proangiogenic receptor VEGFR2. Blood 2010;116:3677–3680.

17. Rissanen TT, Nurro J, Halonen PJ, et al. The bottleneck stent model for chronic myocardial ischemia and heart failure in pigs. Am J Physiol Hear Circ Physiol 2013;305:1297–1308.

18. Nieminen T, Toivanen PI, Laakkonen JP, et al. Slit2 modifies VEGF‐induced

angiogenic responses in rabbit skeletal muscle via reduced eNOS activity. Cardiovasc Res 2015;107:267–276.

(13)

12

19. Groppa E, Brkic S, Uccelli A, et al. EphrinB2/EphB4 signaling regulates non‐sprouting angiogenesis by VEGF. EMBO Rep 2018;19:1–22.

20. Peter G.G. Jackson. Peter D. Cockcroft. Clinical Examination of Farm Animals. 2002.

(14)

13

Table 1

Gene transfer Adenoviral vector doses

Numb er of animal

s

Survive

d d6 Day 0 Day 6

AdCMV + AdGremlin

5x10¹¹ vp+ 1x10¹²

vp 6 6

angiography, LV‐CINE, echocardiograp hy, Gene transfer, blood samples

angiography, LV‐CINE, Echocardiograp hy, vascular permeability, histology, blood samples AdVEGF‐A +

AdCMV

5x10¹¹ vp +

1x10¹² vp 10 7

AdVEGF‐A + AdGremlin

5x10¹¹ vp +

1x10¹² vp 6 6

(15)

14

Figure legends

Figure 1. Intramyocardial gene transfer of AdVEGF‐A induces robust angiogenesis. (A) AdGremlin alone did not induce angiogenesis. (C) AdVEGF‐A induced potent angiogenesis.

(E) AdGremlin modifies AdVEGF‐A angiogenic effect. (G) Dot plot graph shows total microvascular area (%). In day six there is also pericytes around the vessels (B,D,F). CD‐31 staining (A,C,E), ‐SMA (B,D,F), magnification 200x, scale bar 100 µm. Statistical significance is marked by asterisks.

(16)

15

Figure 2. AdVEGF‐A gene transfer induced angiogenesis and increase in permeability. (A‐

F) Shows fluoroscopically visible extravasation of contrast agent in the treatment groups at day 6 (white arrows). Left coronary artery taken from RAO 90 angle. (G and J) there are no signs of pericardial fluid in the AdGremlin group. (H‐I and K‐L) show accumulation of pericardial fluid in echocardiograms at day 6 (white asterisks). (M) shows relative permeability at the GT site.

(17)

16

Figure 3. Gene transfers had no significant effect on cardiac function in healthy porcine hearts. Measurements were assessed using a left ventricular cine angiography. There were no significant differences in ejection fraction (A), stroke volume (B), end diastolic volume (C) or end systolic volume (D) between the groups.

(18)

17

Figure 4. Adenoviral gene transfers had no effect on most of the tested blood parameters. ALP, alkaline phosphatase (A); ALAT, alanine aminotransferase (B); Creat, creatinine (C); LD, lactate dehydrogenase (LD); CRP, C‐reactive protein (E); TnI, troponin I (I).