• Ei tuloksia

Toimitukselta näkymä

N/A
N/A
Info
Lataa
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Jaa "Toimitukselta näkymä"

Copied!
1
0
0

Kokoteksti

(1)

On the Review

Helsinki Law Review is published and edited by students. Its primary purpose is to provide law students in Finland with a forum for practicing their skills in academic writing and as- sessment as well as an opportunity to follow and participate in the work of their peers and seniors.

The Review is published twice a year. The Review is prepared to publish articles and other con- tributions in Finnish, Swedish and English. English Abstracts are provided for articles not fully written in English. The Review is available for free subscription at www.helsinkilawreview.fi to organizations.

Helsinki Law Review is supervised and counselled by an Academic Council that consists of a number of senior academic staff members of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Law.

Each article is evaluated anonymously by a referee chosen among academic professionals.

A referee evaluating an article written by an undergraduate student is advised of the author’s background.

The Review may be cited as Hel. L. Rev.

From the Editors

Dear Readers of the Helsinki Law Review:

We are honored to introduce the Helsinki Law Review 2014/1 issue. We are also pleased to inform you that we have been making great strides and significant changes in the work of the Law Review.

We have, inter alia, started an alumni network, rethought the distribution of the Law Review, and decided to launch the Article of the Year Award, which has also shown to be a great way of deepening our collaboration with our Academic Council. We would like to take this opportunity to congratulate once more the winner of the 2013 Article of the Year Award, namely Tapio Rasila whose article about states as clients of private military and security companies has also received attention from the media. Regarding the distribution of the Law Review, the hard copy of the Law Review will be distributed in new locations and the online version will now be available on SSRN and hopefully in other online databases as well.

The editors of Helsinki Law Review have worked hard throughout the spring and I would like to thank them all for having shown such enthusiasm and openness to new ideas and bettering our Review. Their ideas have been innovative and fresh, forcing the Review to develop in a quick pace.

It has been my privilege to be a part of the Law Review for such a long time. I have no doubt that Helsinki Law Review will continue to evolve into an even greater journal.

Finally and most importantly, we welcome all suggestions, thoughts, and comments from our readers. We are also welcoming editor applications in the fall of 2014, and hope to get more great and enthusiastic editors to be a part of our team.

I wish you all a great summer. Kippis!

Mirjam Supponen Editor-in-Chief

Viittaukset

LIITTYVÄT TIEDOSTOT

Tornin värähtelyt ovat kasvaneet jäätyneessä tilanteessa sekä ominaistaajuudella että 1P- taajuudella erittäin voimakkaiksi 1P muutos aiheutunee roottorin massaepätasapainosta,

Työn merkityksellisyyden rakentamista ohjaa moraalinen kehys; se auttaa ihmistä valitsemaan asioita, joihin hän sitoutuu. Yksilön moraaliseen kehyk- seen voi kytkeytyä

Kulttuurinen musiikintutkimus ja äänentutkimus ovat kritisoineet tätä ajattelutapaa, mutta myös näissä tieteenperinteissä kuunteleminen on ymmärretty usein dualistisesti

Since both the beams have the same stiffness values, the deflection of HSS beam at room temperature is twice as that of mild steel beam (Figure 11).. With the rise of steel

The new European Border and Coast Guard com- prises the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, namely Frontex, and all the national border control authorities in the member

The Canadian focus during its two-year chairmanship has been primarily on economy, on “responsible Arctic resource development, safe Arctic shipping and sustainable circumpo-

The Statutes of the Russian Orthodox Church limit the jurisdiction of the Russian Orthodox Church to including “persons of Orthodox confession living on the canonical territory

The problem is that the popu- lar mandate to continue the great power politics will seriously limit Russia’s foreign policy choices after the elections. This implies that the