• Ei tuloksia

Protected areas and high conservation value forests in the Barents Region: Sweden, Finland and Russia

N/A
N/A
Info
Lataa
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Jaa "Protected areas and high conservation value forests in the Barents Region: Sweden, Finland and Russia"

Copied!
4
0
0

Kokoteksti

(1)

R E S U LT S I N B R I E F | W W W. B PA N . F I | D E C E M B E R 2017 B A R E N T S P ROT E C T E D A R E A N E T WO R K

Protected areas and high conservation value forests in the Barents Region:

Sweden, Finland and Russia

Protected areas safeguard biodiversity

and help mitigate climate change.

The protection of terrestrial ecosystems in the Barents Region should continue and focus on areas with high biodiversity values.

High conservation value forests (HCVFs) in the Barents Region should be preserved.

The ecological

connectivity of boreal

forests in the Barents

Region should be increased.

(2)

The Barents Protected Area Network (BPAN)

The second phase of the Barents Protected Area Network (BPAN) quantified and described protected areas and high conservation value forests (HCVFs) in the Barents Region. The project was an initiative of the Barents Euro-Arctic Council’s Working Group on Environment and its Subgroup on Nature Protection, conducted by national and regional nature protection authorities, research institutions and NGOs from Sweden, Finland and Russia. It covered the Barents regions in these countries, with the excep- tion of North Karelia in Finland and the Russian archipelagos of Novaya Zemlya and Franz Josef Land.

Between 2015 and 2017 the project produced updated informa- tion on progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets 5 and 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The main focus was on forests, which cover about 60% of the study area.

The results can be used in nature protection planning and sus- tainable management of forest resources in the Barents Region.

PROTECTED AREAS (PAS) COVER SLIGHTLY LESS THAN 13 % OF THE WHOLE STUDY AREA. IN NORTHERN SWEDEN PAS COVER 23%, IN NORTHERN FINLAND 23% AND IN NORTHWEST RUSSIA NEARLY 10% OF THE STUDY AREA. HOWEVER, THE LEVEL OF PROTECTION DIFFERS CONSIDERABLY BETWEEN THE REGIONS.

The main causes of habitat loss in forest areas

are logging, construction and road building but also mining and oil and gas

extraction.

AICHI BIODIVERSITY TARGET

11

”By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water areas and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well-connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape.”

(3)

There is a need to safeguard valuable forest areas

The project produced new knowledge on the amount of protect- ed forests in the study area. By the end of 2015, close to 12% of the forests in the study area were included in protected areas.

The concept of high conservation value forests (HCVFs) was used to identify forests that are particularly valuable for biodi- versity. Field data, national forest inventories, remote sensing data as well as aerial images provided information about the distribution and characteristics of these forests. The data was analysed and presented in a comprehensive set of maps, using GIS. According to the updated information about the distribution and protection status of HCVFs, many valuable forests remain unprotected. This information can be used to further develop the protected area network in the Barents Region. Overall, it is important to have updated information about high conservation value forests to increase the ecological connectivity of boreal forests in the Barents Region.

The project formulated expert conclusions regarding the future development of the protected area network as well as preservation of HCVFs, based on statistical information and analyses carried out between 2015 and 2017. A comprehensive set of maps, tables and statistical data can be found in the final report of the project (Kuhmonen et al. 2017).

The Barents Region boasts the largest high

conservation value forests in Europe, which

remain intact despite an increasing amount of

human activities.

© Transparent World, SYKE/ BPAN project

© Maanmittauslaitos

© Lantmäteriet

© Norwegian Mapping Authority

© Swedish Forest Agency

© The County Administrative Boards of Norrbotten and Västerbotten

© Ministry of the Environment of Finland

© The IFL Mapping Team

© Transparent World, SYKE / Gap Analysis

© SPOK, SYKE /Gap Analysis

© WWF-Russia, SYKE / Gap Analysis

© Swedish Environmental Protection Agency

© Komi Regional Non-Profit Foundation ”Silver Taiga”

© SYKE (partly Metla, Mavi, LIVI, VRK, MML Maasto- tietokanta 05/2012)

© SYKE, Transparent World/ Gap analysis

© The Norwegian Environment Agency

© The Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute

© ESRI High conservation value forests (HCVFs) should be legally protected, or their natural values should be

otherwise preserved.

HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE FORESTS (HCVFS) ARE OF SPECIAL IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY.

THE SECOND PHASE OF THE BPAN PROJECT IDENTIFIED AND MAPPED HCVFS IN THE BARENTS REGION.

AICHI BIODIVERSITY TARGET 5

”By 2020, the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, is at least halved and where feasible brought close to zero, and degradation and fragmentation is significantly reduced.”

(4)

R E S U LT S I N B R I E F | W W W. B PA N . F I | D E C E M B E R 2017 B A R E N T S P ROT E C T E D A R E A N E T WO R K

EXPERT CONCLUSIONS

I.Protection of terrestrial ecosystems in the Barents Region

There is a need to establish more conservation areas in the Barents Region

• The establishment of protected areas should continue in the Barents Region in line with long-term national and regional conservation plans.

• More work is needed to protect areas with the greatest biodiversity benefits in order to fulfil the Aichi Target 11 by 2020.

• In order to preserve the full range of biodiversity in the Barents Region, there is a need to apply the ecosystem approach, and to promote access to open data on protected areas and valuable ecosystems.

• Furthermore, the protected area systems should be developed at different geographical scales, from global and ecoregional to regional and local levels.

II.Mapping of forests with high conservation values (HCVFs) in the Barents Region

High conservation value forests should be integrated into conservation planning

• High conservation value forests (HCVFs) that are included in existing and planned protected areas should be guaranteed strong protection.

• HCVFs and especially HCVFs that are located in well-connected landscape matrixes should be given high priority when deciding which areas should be included in protected areas.

• HCVFs that for various reasons are not given priority for inclusion in protected areas should be managed in a way that contributes to biodiversity conservation in the forest landscape as a whole, using other effective area-based conservation measures.

• The Strategy for Protection of Intact Forests in the Barents Region (2015) should be finalised and implemented.

III.Enhancing connectivity of boreal forests in the Barents Region

Strong connectivity between protected areas is crucial for maintaining biodiversity and sustaining ecosystem services

• Connectivity should be increased in particular between the more isolated protected areas in the southern and middle boreal zones.

• Adaptation to climate change needs more attention. The boreal forests of the Scandinavian Mountains and the Ural Mountains still host well-connected HCVFs that provide possible dispersal corridors for species towards north and to higher altitudes.

• Guidelines for identifying well-connected forest areas and tools for implementing measures to ensure better connectivity should be further developed and applied in practice.

• Co-operation between different stakeholders should be established and further developed in order to combine biodiversity conservation and other use of forest areas such as forestry operations and development of infrastructure.

• A comprehensive assessment of the connectivity of forested areas in the Barents Region is needed, including further descriptions of the natural features and land use of each region.

Editors: Mai Suominen and Bo Storrank/Finnish Environment Institute Photo: Olli Manninen

The statistical information, graphics as well as expert conclusions presented in this brochure are based on the BPAN project on high conservation value forests implemented between 2015 and 2017. Several experts from Sweden, Finland and Russia contributed to the analyses of data and compilation of the project report. (Kuhmonen et al. 2017).

Reference: Kuhmonen A., Mikkola J., Storrank, B. and Lindholm T. (eds.). 2017. Protected areas and high conservation value forests in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region - Sweden, Finland and Russia. Reports of the Finnish Environment Institute 33. (helda.helsinki.fi/syke)

Layout: Niina Silvasti/Visual Monkey Print: aDigi Helsinki 2017

ISBN 978-952-11-4891-0 (pbk.) | ISBN 978-952-11-4892-7 (PDF)

Viittaukset

LIITTYVÄT TIEDOSTOT

Even for those respondents whose majority of social media partners resided in Finland, Finns constituted only 6 per cent of those contacts, Russians constituted 34 per cent, and

Water joint property associations, fishing conservation areas and game conservation areas are formed for the management of resources which do not remain stationary within

To improve the short-term prediction of the water quality and particularly the dynamics of algal blooms in the coastal areas of the Gulf of Finland, sediment phosphorus and

Концепция лесов высокой природоохранной ценности (ЛВПЦ) использовалась для определения участков леса, которые особенно ценны

The project has identified several valuable mega-corridors especially in the north and along the mountain chains. The most important areas are 1) the foothills and slopes of the

The proportion of sewers was 72 per cent, that of pumping stations 6 per cent and that of waste water treatment plants 22 per cent of total investments in sewer systems. In the

7 per cent and that of waste water treatment plants 23 per cent of total investments in sewer systems.. In the building of waste water treatment plants 107 million marks were used

portion of sewers was 81 per cent, that of waste water treatment plants 15 per cent and that of pumping stations 4 per cent of total investments in sewer systems.. The length of