• Ei tuloksia

Problem set 5

N/A
N/A
Info
Lataa
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Jaa "Problem set 5"

Copied!
1
0
0

Kokoteksti

(1)

Wavelets, spring 2002

Problem set 5

1. Let ϕ be the Haar scaling function. Check directly in this case that the function a as dened in Lemma 6.1 is identically equal to one.

2. Let P : L2(R) → L2(R) be a linear map. P is called a projection if P ◦P =P. A projection is orthogonal if for all f, g ∈L2(R)

hP f, gi=hf, P gi

Let ϕ be a scaling function and ψ the associated wavelet and dene Pjf =

X

k=−∞

hf, ϕj,kj,k

Qjf =

X

k=−∞

hf, ψj,kj,k

Show that Pj and Qj are orthogonal projections.

3. Let m0(ω) =P

k=−∞hkeiωk and assume that

|m0(ω)|2+|m0(ω+π)|2 = 1 m0(0) = 1

Show that

X

k=−∞

h2k =

X

k=−∞

h2k+1 = 1/2

Hint: compute m0(ω)±m0(ω+π).

4. Computehsuch that the associated ψhas at least 2 vanishing moments.

Proceed like in the last problem of Problem set 4 and assume initially thatm0is like in equation (7.1) in the notes. Then check that the prop- erty in Theorem 7.2 holds. Also estimate numerically the smoothness of the wavelet with help of Theorem 7.3.

1

Viittaukset

LIITTYVÄT TIEDOSTOT

Lemma 1.5 [M&U Lemma 7.5]: In a finite Markov chain there is at least one recurrent state, and all recurrent states are positive recurrent.. (Proof is left as an exercise. A

Lemma 1.5 [M&U Lemma 7.5]: In a finite Markov chain there is at least one recurrent state, and all recurrent states are positive recurrent.. (Proof is left as an exercise. A

[r]

Although these two things are not directly related it turns out that requiring more vanishing moments tends to make the wavelet more regular as well... This is a bit surprising

As already explained, in this case the model has an equilibrium in which high- risk interest rate r H has the value ¹ r H that it would have in the absence of the leverage

2 a.k.a. the Jacobi principle [13].. The first formula is quite straightforward to check. First let us introduce potential forces. Recall that the potential is simply a function U

This shows that the identically zero function and v − u are weak solutions to the Dirichlet problem with zero boundary values.. Thus the problem has two solutions corresponding to

One problem is that in the Newton iteration we need second (and in the holonomic case even third) order differentials.. One