• Ei tuloksia

ÅAU research grants 2021

N/A
N/A
Info
Lataa
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Jaa "ÅAU research grants 2021"

Copied!
2
0
0

Kokoteksti

(1)

Åbo Akademi University // Tuomiokirkontori 3, FI-20500 TURKU // Phone: +358 2 215 31 // abo.fi

Åbo Akademi University Research Services Domkyrkotorget 3 20500 Åbo Finland

ÅAU research grants 2021

Evaluation process and criteria

 The applications are evaluated for each faculty by the professor members in the Board of the Graduate School at Åbo Akademi University. The specific scholarship fund applications are evaluated according to how the grants are awarded (professor members at the Faculty of Arts, Psychology and Theology evaluate Donner, Polin, Eriksson; professor members at the Faculty of Social Sciences, Business and Economics evaluate Jacobsson, Klingendahl). The evaluator does not assess any applicant which he/she supervises or any projects in which he/she is involved.

o Apart from the above-described process, separate external experts will evaluate the Donner and Polin applications.

 The research plan is evaluated according to the following criteria:

academic quality (scale 1-6) and feasibility (within the allotted time) (scale 0-2)

 Academic quality

o 1 = Poor: Very few strengths and several major weaknesses o 2 = Fair: Some strengths, but at least one major weakness or a

number of minor weaknesses.

o 3 = Good: Some strengths and some weaknesses o 4 = Very good: Strong plan with minor weaknesses

o 5 = Excellent: Very strong plan with negligible weaknesses o 6 = Outstanding: Exceptionally strong plan with negligible

weaknesses

 Feasibility (within the allotted time) o 0 = Not feasible

o 1 = Partially feasible o 2 = Feasible

If the research plan is evaluated as Not feasible, the academic quality will be evaluated as 0. If the research plan is evaluated as Partially

feasible or Feasible, the academic quality will be evaluated on the scale 1-6.

(2)

Åbo Akademi University // Tuomiokirkontori 3, FI-20500 TURKU // Phone: +358 2 215 31 // abo.fi

Additional criteria that will affect the final decision for the doctoral research grants:

 Progression (doctoral candidate advances in studies according to a time schedule which will allow graduation in 4 years)

 Previous funding will be taken into account before the final order of preference (general principle: doctoral candidates can get a total funding of max 48 months for a doctoral degree)

Decision process

 The evaluators grade each application individually, without discussing the grades with other evaluators. The grades are sent to Research

Services, where an overall average will be calculated for each applicant.

Based on the overall average grades, a list with an order of preference will be sent to the evaluators, who then will make a proposal for the awarding of the research grants per faculty.

 Decision regarding the Runar Eriksson grant will be made by the Board of the Graduate School on November 2, 2020.

 The Donner, Polin, Jacobsson and Klingendahl research grants will be discussed in the Donner, Polin and FSE grant committee respectively.

Each committee makes a proposal that has to be approved by the Board of the Åbo Akademi University Foundation.

 The Board of the ÅAU Foundation meets on November 10, 2020, after which the result for all the research grants 2021 will be sent out to all applicants as soon as the decision has been made available to the ÅAU Research Services.

Viittaukset

LIITTYVÄT TIEDOSTOT

FSE - Faculty of social sciences, business and economics Amount of grant months. Goren Ran Statskunskap

Åbo Akademi University Research services Domkyrkotorget 3 20500 Åbo Finland.. ÅAU research

Intercultural Encounters and Cross-Cultural Psychology 5 P1-4 Intercultural Communication - Critical Perspectives 5 P1-4. Culture, Peace and Conflict

Upon receipt of the student's transcript, the Department informs the student about courses she/he is eligible to take.. The Department of Swedish Language welcomes

• The research plan is evaluated according to the following criteria: academic quality (scale 1-6) and feasibility (within the allotted time) (scale 0-2).. •

I will use the following names for these six factors/phenomena: (1) the Central European gateway, (2) the Post-Swiderian people, (3) the resettlement of Northern Europe, (4) the

The US and the European Union feature in multiple roles. Both are identified as responsible for “creating a chronic seat of instability in Eu- rope and in the immediate vicinity

Indeed, while strongly criticized by human rights organizations, the refugee deal with Turkey is seen by member states as one of the EU’s main foreign poli- cy achievements of