• Ei tuloksia

View of Tonny Krijnen & Sofie Van Bauwel: Gender and Media: Representing, Producing, Consuming. New York: Routledge. 2015.

N/A
N/A
Info
Lataa
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Jaa "View of Tonny Krijnen & Sofie Van Bauwel: Gender and Media: Representing, Producing, Consuming. New York: Routledge. 2015."

Copied!
3
0
0

Kokoteksti

(1)

MedieKultur | Journal of media and communication research | ISSN 1901-9726 Book Review

Published by SMID | Society of Media researchers In Denmark | www.smid.dk Th e online version of this text can be found open access at https://tidsskrift.dk/mediekultur

141

MedieKultur 2020, 67, 141-143

Tonny Krijnen & Sofi e Van Bauwel:

Gender and Media: Representing, Producing, Consuming.

New York: Routledge. 2015.

Kelechi Amakoh

Th e media landscape of today is greatly infl uenced by the increasing wave of globalization and ever-changing new media technologies. Th ese guiding factors help to understand the intersection between media and other related concepts in the 21st century. In Tonny Kri- jnen and Sofi e van Bauwel’s book, Gender and Media: Representing, Producing, Consum- ing, these factors are taken into consideration in the discussion of the media’s intersection with gender. Th e authors look at this intersection through the lenses of media representa- tion, production and consumption of media content.

Krijnen and van Bauwel off er their viewpoint to the age-long debate about gender and media discourse. Specifi cally, from the outset the authors pursue the goal of provid- ing a safe space for readers to arrive at their conclusion about the kind of connection that exists between media and gender (p. 2), and the authors’ ambitious aim is to provide an understanding of the relationship between the media and gender (p. 4).

To achieve this overarching goal, the authors present an overview of the aspects related to gender and the media: representation, production and consumption. Th e focus on these aspects help provide a nuanced understanding of the relationship in gendered media and fi lls a gap in scholarship.

Gender and Media highlights the faint borders that exist between representation, pro- duction and consumption of gendered media content. Th roughout the nine chapters of the book, the authors show how these faint borders are continually shrinking as a result of advancement in media technology and globalization.

(2)

MedieKultur 67

142

On gender representation, the authors focus on three concepts: subjectivity, subject positions and identity. Th ey draw on scholars such as Stuart Hall, Jacques Lacan and van Zoonen to help unpack these concepts. In doing so, they surmise that the interaction between issues of subjectivity, subject positions and the identity of a person makes the concept gender fl uid. Th e fl uidity of gender representation is a result of the disruption tool known as intertextuality (p. 62). Using Lady Gaga and her music as an example, the authors argue that there is a multiplicity of gendered meanings displayed through her dressing, music videos, lyrics and personality.

According to the authors, intertextuality leads to the disruption of the masculin- ity/femininity dichotomy and gives rise to queer theorists. Th ese theorists advance the notion of identifi cation of several identities beyond the binary gender (p. 65). However, this call for a look beyond binary gender is yet to gain the traction it deserves. Specifi cally, the Western world remains the only area that has incorporated the concept (p. 72). Th e understanding of gender representation is normative and ambiguous (p. 44) and must be seen from a holistic context to make sense (p. 71). In the fi rst three chapters, Krijnen and van Bauwel posit that gender representation in the media is a result of several intervening factors such as media convergence, transnationalization of the media, and development in media technology, thereby leading to a Western gendered representation across the globe (p. 49).

Th e authors dedicate chapters 4–6 to the ongoing discourses on media production and gendered content. Th e authors dedicate three chapters of the book to this discussion and off er their contribution. One popular discourse is the glass ceiling in the mediasphere.

According to the authors, the concept is “vague” (p. 94) and “loosely used” (p. 95). Draw- ing on available scholarly texts, the authors argue that on top of gender inequality, glass ceiling causes ethnic inequality (p. 95).

Th e authors also Juxtaposes the concept of the glass ceiling with the concept of the sticky fl oor. On one hand, the glass ceiling factors such as class, disability, sexuality and ethnicity limits ascendancy on professional ranking. On the other hand, the concept of the sticky fl oor acknowledges the fact that women are promoted just as much as men but are paid less for the same job (p. 96).

With the invisible ceiling yet to be fully removed, the authors note that the advance- ment of new media technologies has rejigged the concept of production. Th is has brought about a democratic process in media production, thereby allowing the once passive audience to be active content creators. However, recent studies show how these technological innovations promote the male hegemonic order thereby causing a gender imbalance in the creation of User Generated Content (p. 119). Th e male hegemonic order reinforced by the advancement in media technology highlights the deep-seated imba- lance between gender and media. It remains to be seen when women will be seen as

“producers” (p. 110) of media content and not only consumers.

Review: Gender and Media: Representing, Producing, Consuming.

Kelechi Amakoh

(3)

MedieKultur 67

143

Th e last three chapters focus on consumption. Th e authors discuss two concepts in the discourses on gender and media: sexualization and pornofi cation. According to the authors, sexualization aims to connect everything trending in society – clothes, music – with sex. On the other hand, they defi ne pornofi cation as “slightly less trendy” (p. 159).

Th ese concepts as discussed in the book highlight how complex gendered media are today. Th e authors, therefore, advocate for the inclusion of the voices of women and girls in this discourse. Th ey premise their advocacy on the fact that women and girls are the ones at risk of a highly sexualized and pornofi cated media (p. 164).

Krijnen and van Bauwel draw upon numerous concepts related to gender and media situated upon two infl uential and overarching standpoints: globalization and new media.

A downside to this is the minimal exploration of these concepts in the book. On the other hand, suggestions for further reading after every chapter and the provision of inter- active text boxes within the chapters help cover the book’s downside.

Gender and Media: Representing, Producing, Consuming provides a critical angle to discourses on gender and media. Th e authors provide an understanding of the complex

“relation between gender and media and its complications” (p. 14). Within the nine chap- ters of the book, the authors strive to achieve this goal with considerable success in spite of the complexities of gender and media discourse.

Th is book creates a safe space (p. 2), as aimed for by the authors, for a reader to make an informed position in the discourse of gender and media. As envisioned by the authors, the book provides a balanced view and empowers the reader with the needed tools to form their opinion on ongoing debates about gender and the media (p.14). Th is book should make the reading list of students, researchers and teachers as well as advocates of gender and media.

Kelechi Amakoh Graduate Student School of Communication and Culture

Aarhus University, Denmark Kelechi Amakoh

Review: Gender and Media: Representing, Producing, Consuming.

Viittaukset

LIITTYVÄT TIEDOSTOT

in the media sphere encompasses 88 outlets, of which 56 are individual activists and journalists.3 Te fexi- bility of this law as a repressive instrument was again demonstrated

The contributions in this special issue are beginning to show a change in this matter, as they attend to the materiality in data, yet not at the expense of questions of reception.

Th is issue of MedieKultur explores some of the various ways in which gender and media intersect in today’s mediascape – for example, how media in their diff erent forms are

Between them they have produced several earlier handbooks and reference works in the fi eld: New Technologies and the Media (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), Global Mobile Media

Especially in conjunction with other current works on social media logics and datafication (van Dijck & Poell, 2013), the work of Jose van Dijck constitutes a prolific

The author defines new media as a result of merging media and social networks and as an indicator of a second structural communication (r)evolution in which media networks become

While the discourse on convergence culture, trans-media and creative industry may remind of the relation between media and making introduced then, it seems that todays departure

Luhmann suggests a logical, evolution-dependent connection between writing and printing, on the one hand, and symbolically generalised communication media on the other,