• Ei tuloksia

General outline for a two-year extension of MACSUR: Cross-cutting activities

N/A
N/A
Info
Lataa
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Jaa "General outline for a two-year extension of MACSUR: Cross-cutting activities"

Copied!
12
0
0

Kokoteksti

(1)

General outline for a two- year extension of MACSUR:

Cross-cutting activities

Martin Köchy

Martin Banse, Richard Tiffin, Frank Ewert, Reimund Rötter, Agnes van den Pol-van Dasselaar, Floor Brouwer, Franz

Sinabell, Jason Jorgenson, Eli Sætnan, Richard Kipling

(2)

JPI rules

»The duration of the Knowledge Hub will be 3 years for a first phase, … with a perspective of a two year extension, subject to a successful review and budget availability«

•  2-yr extension: June 2015–May 2017

•  FACCE GB recommends extension of funding to national funding agencies

•  national funding — national rules

— presumably strong reliance on in-kind funding

(3)

Begin phase 2 2015-June

Revisions based on funding 3 mo

National funding decisions 2015–March

National application evaluation 3 mo

National application submissions 2014-December

Prepare national applications 1 mo

Final detailed, overall workplan 2014-November

Adjustments to expected national funding effective summer break

2 mo

2 mo July/August GB recommendation of extension

Annual Report 2014-June

(within-Theme and cross-Theme outlines) 2014-May

Requested schedule for FACCE to present to funders

(4)

Mission of phase 2

Use models, techniques and methodologies already improved during phase 1 to carry out

•  new state-of-the art

•  Europe-wide

•  cross-cutting activities

in climate change risk assessment for farming and food

… clear benefits to farmers and policy-makers

(5)

FACCE MACSUR structure 1

Coordination of Knowledge Hub

CropM

TradeM

LiveM

Capacity building

Methodological case studies Regional pilot studies

Cross-cutting activities Science excellence

Network activity

(6)

FACCE MACSUR structure 2

Coordination of Knowledge Hub

CropM

TradeM

LiveM

Capacity building

Methodological case studies

Regional integrated

studies European dimension

Cross-cutting activities Science excellence

Network activity

(7)

Proposed XC activities

•  Evolution, upscaling, and transfer of

knowledge gained in regional case studies.

•  Assessment of additional scenarios of socio- economic and climate trends.

•  Further development of an interdisciplinary scientific community.

(8)

XC activities, details

•  WPs with coordinators from 2-3 Themes

•  apply experiences to other case studies across Europe

•  scale up to Europe

•  capacity building in integrated modelling

•  additional socio-economic × climate scenarios

•  CC è feed quality è feed utilization è economy

•  GHGꜛ from livestock: mitigation vs. meat consumpt.

(9)

Theme core contributions to XC

•  Apply phase 1 and other essential methods to support XC aims

•  Extending scaling methods for crop models to the European and global scale.

•  Intensification of feed quality and animal health modelling with climate change.

•  Economic models from farm to global level

capable of reflecting climate change.

(10)

To consider for today

•  What knowledge can you contribute to XC?

•  What essentials are missing?

•  What resources are required?

è Themes report back in session D3.1 (tomorrow, 8:45)

è overall discussion after parallel workshops,

in session D3.5 (12:15)

(11)

Hub core contribution

•  Alignment of activities across Themes

•  Management of central resources

— web site,

— document server,

— metadata discovery tools,

— dissemination activities,

— networking with other projects

(12)

TBD: XC activities

•  WP1 Regional case studies (lead from T+C)

—  10-15 case studies, upscaling to Europe, sub-Sah. Afr.

•  WP2 Forage crop quality (lead from L+C)

—  CC impact, feed utilisation, alternative forages, economics of changes in feed quantity and quality

•  WP3 Mitigation vs diet change (lead from L+T)

—  impacts on livestock, impacts on economy, environmental footprint of changed human diet

•  WP4 Tool box for dissemination

•  WP5 Stakeholder involvement

•  WP6 Integrated uncertainty and scaling

Viittaukset

LIITTYVÄT TIEDOSTOT

Economic growth contributes to biodiversity loss and environmental degradation in general, as intensive use of resources and trade lead to climate and land-use change, and spread

• Both networks coordinate efforts to improve agricultural models and develop common protocols to systematize modelling for the assessment of climate change impacts on

 Modelling economic consequences of novel solutions to control production diseases in pigs and poultry.. •

(2013) used an ensemble of 15 global climate models to assess uncertainties in impacts of climate change on grass production. In the study of Höglind et al. In their study the

Pearson, R.G., Dawson, T.P. Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Climate and land use change impacts on

Statistical days 2009: Statistical methods and models to assess Global climate change organizers: the Finnish Statisti- cal Society, university of kuopio (department of mathematics

statistical days 2009: statistical methods and models to assess Global climate change organizers: the Finnish statisti- cal society, university of kuopio (department of mathematics

With regard to the geoeconomic analysis of climate change, the Indian case shows that climate change and its prevention can generate cooperation between countries and global