• Ei tuloksia

Focus group sessions – in depth understanding of users näkymä

N/A
N/A
Info
Lataa
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Jaa "Focus group sessions – in depth understanding of users näkymä"

Copied!
2
0
0

Kokoteksti

(1)

22

Focus group sessions – in depth understanding of users

Eva Höglund

In the autumn 2011, Åbo Akademi University Library conducted a focus group study among students. The main purpose was to find out what our patrons think of the Library’s services and how the Library should develop them to meet the needs of patrons. Service improvements were made as a result of the focus group study, but the study also opened views generally on the users’

experiences and expectations.

The focus group method

One big challenge for university libraries now- adays is to involve their patrons in the develop- ment of their services. Åbo Akademi University Library decided to embark on a new way of as- sessing the needs of our patrons, namely the fo- cus group method.

The focus group method is a form of qualitative research in which a group of people are asked about their opinions and attitudes towards, for instance, a service. Since the 1980s, the method has been popular within social sciences and has increasing- ly been used by libraries.

During focus group sessions the participants can freely discuss certain themes or questions, which are presented by the moderator for the session.

The aim is to get as many opinions as possible on a certain activity or topic. One of the advantages of focus group sessions is the interaction and co- operation between the participants. This can nev- er be achieved by individual interviews or surveys.

Preparing the study

A working group, consisting of six librarians with- in Åbo Akademi University Library, was set out to plan and implement the focus group study. The working group completed a ques- tionnaire for the focus group ses- sions. The main issues were fol- lowing: where patrons search for information, whom they turn to when having problems in infor- mation retrieval, how they have acquired their search methods, what they think about the Li- brary’s resources and services, and what function the Library has in their lives as students.

Seventeen students, represent- ing all divisions of the Univer- sity, finally participated in three 2-hour focus group sessions. Each

(2)

group consisted of 5-6 student participants in ad- dition to three library representatives. One of the library representatives acted as a moderator, one as a secretary and one as a listener.

To recruit participants to the focus group ses- sions the Library posted invitation flyers in read- ing rooms in the main and campus libraries and on notice boards and lunch restaurants on the cam- pus. The flyer was also distributed by e-mail to all students at the University as well as posted on the Library’s blog, http://blogs.abo.fi/biblioteket/, and Facebook page, https://www.facebook.com/Aka- demibiblioteket.

The sessions were held in the relaxing atmos- phere at the University cafeteria. The sessions were opened with a short presentation of the aim of the study, along with some refreshments and snacks. After the presentation of the participants, the moderator started posing questions in the pre- pared questionnaire. After completing the sessions the participants received a cinema ticket as thanks.

“Just in time” support desired

Surprisingly enough participants in all three ses- sions agreed on most issues. The Library as a phys- ical environment was considered very important.

Several participants considered the Library their

“workplace” and “a social meeting place”. The fa- cilities received much appreciation, especially read- ing rooms and group study rooms.

The Library’s materials and resources were ap- preciated but the problem of finding what one needed was considered difficult. More guides for using databases were requested as well as more in- struction in information retrieval at the right point of time, i.e. when the students write essays, papers or Master’s theses.

It was disappointing to hear that students rare- ly turn to librarians when in need of help with in- formation retrieval. It seems to be much easier to turn to a fellow student or a teacher. On the oth- er hand, the Library received positive feedback for instance its presence in social media.

Closer to users

The library representatives felt that they got clos- er to their patrons and experienced a genuine un- derstanding of what the patrons need and consid- er important. Also, participants expressed genu- ine approval of the sessions and said they learned new things about Library. Some of the participants became friends with the Library on Facebook and made comments on our blog.

The results of the study were presented to the whole library staff. In addition, the results have al- so been posted on the Library’s social media plat- forms and on the webpage, of Åbo Akademi Uni- versity so that students and staff would be aware of the findings.

The focus group method proved to be a very re- warding and interesting method. As a qualitative study, it complements previous quantitative stud- ies. The method also proved to be an effective mar- keting tool for the Library. As a result of the focus group study, the Library has already taken measures to improve some of the issues among the findings.

E.g. the Library’s information retrieval courses have been marketed more intensively. The Library is al- so planning a “Book a librarian” service and prepar- ing more guides for the use of library databases. &

Information on the writer:

Eva Höglund, Librarian

Åbo Akademi University Library Email: eva.hoglund@abo.f

Viittaukset

LIITTYVÄT TIEDOSTOT

In August 2010, a conference that focused on similar issues was organized in Sundsvall, Sweden by the Nordic working group on the ecology of primeval boreal forests

Table 3.Diagnoses of patients presenting with infectious focus (Group I), with fever without infectious focus on admission (Group II), or with neither fever nor infectious focus

In the second course the data on student experiences was generated through analysis of two focus group interviews with volunteer students from the course,

To remedy this shortcoming the Nordic Cooperation Committee for Humanistic Research set up a joint working group in 1985 to pro- duce a document that might form the basis

FRBR (IFLA Study Group 1997) ja sen johdannaiset FRAD (IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering 2009) ja FRSAD (IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements

planning, strategy and proceedings documents, a focus group interview in Perunkajärvi and a semi- structured questionnaire. When analysing the in- teraction of different levels

The International Relations Group is one of the most active working groups of the Finnish Rese- arch Library Association. Within the twenty yea- rs of its existence, the Group

The conceptual models of the IFLA Working Groups, Working Group on Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Working Group on Functional Requirements and